What's new

9/11 : Then and now ( Photos )

How much oil did we steal?
ask the sources that claim it...I just wrote what I read :unsure:

LOL. It is USA's money, and USA can spend it as it wishes. Let others spend their own money, and not try to tell USA what to do with its money.

Besides, it is the other countries that beg USA to sell them its weaponry, not the other way around.

See how that works? :D
wow ..... Kehtay hain aqal mandoun kay liyea ishara hi kafi hota hai but either you are playing dumb or you literally are over rated!

I said once they have spent the money do you think they will not cause chaos to get sales in order to recover the cost? And that crap about USA's money ...dont forget their loans from China...it is not their money they are spending what they dont have and need to pay back so what guarantees can you give they dont cause chaos to make sales? :pop:
 
.
petty simple. Why is it so difficult for some to understand? actually I think it is more unwillingness rather than inability to understand

Bingo!

And China has not not given any loans to USA. China does buy US Treasury Bonds as a means of keeping its own money secure with good returns in the only place it knows: USA. :D
 
.
2C35E5FC00000578-3230792-image-a-53_1442027609505.jpg


============================================

2C34164400000578-3230792-image-a-61_1442027663116.jpg
 
. .
What we have learnt from 9/11 is new American physics such as aluminium can penetrate enforced concrete and steel structures.

I wonder why there is a need to produce depleted-uran or wolfram ammunitions at all. Isn't that a waste of money when cheap aluminium can do the job?
 
.
ask the sources that claim it...I just wrote what I read :unsure:


:pop:

Post your sources here. I'm curious.

What we have learnt from 9/11 is new American physics such as aluminium can penetrate enforced concrete and steel structures.

I wonder why there is a need to produce depleted-uran or wolfram ammunitions at all. Isn't that a waste of money when cheap aluminium can do the job?

If a B-25 can penetrate concrete and steel of the Empire State Building. I'm sure on 9/11 it can do the same under American physics. Heck even water can cut steel.
empire_state-1945.jpg
 
.
. .
I see a big hole in the building that is made of steel and concrete. The plane should have just bounced or crushed and building intact with no external damage.

Still trying to fool other people or are you that dense? Of course there will be some major damages. We are talking about the whole plane vanishing into the building leaving zero trace outside the building.

Next, the US army should throw balloons filled with water to crack open bunkers as water can cut through steel. :lol:
 
.
I see a big hole in the building that is made of steel and concrete. The plane should have just bounced or crushed and building intact with no external damage.
lolz but it shouldnt have crashed downwards like all the foundation broke.....although the plane crashed at the top stories....

12003962_701948766572796_8872160398782920073_n.png
 
.
lolz but it shouldnt have crashed downwards like all the foundation broke.....although the plane crashed at the top stories....

12003962_701948766572796_8872160398782920073_n.png

Good post here. Yup, it is so fishy with fake report to UN and not being serious in capturing Osama Bin Laden in Torabora ( only use several American soldiers and relied on Pastun soldiers instead) while the action is totally opposite when attacking Iraq with full force (even though not having any relation at all with 9/11 attack) . I dont blame all USA over this, just some Hawkish there.
 
.
Good post here. Yup, it is so fishy with fake report to UN and not being serious in capturing Osama Bin Laden in Torabora ( only use several American soldiers and relied on Pastun soldiers instead) while the action is totally opposite when attacking Iraq with full force (even though not having any relation at all with 9/11 attack) . I dont blame all USA over this, just some Hawkish there.
I never blamed the people....Got too many good friends there....

but the policies and establishment is def questionable!


@Oldman1 Just something by some American


@Indos

Somewhere in UK:

BBC Foreknowledge of 9/11 Collapse of WTC Building Seven: British Man Won Law Suit against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
 
. .
.
Still trying to fool other people or are you that dense? Of course there will be some major damages. We are talking about the whole plane vanishing into the building leaving zero trace outside the building.

Next, the US army should throw balloons filled with water to crack open bunkers as water can cut through steel. :lol:

A B-25 bomber which is a propeller can punch through a building and go into it, I'm sure a modern passenger plane can do the same. And of course water can still cut through steel. Simple physics. American physics.:-)

steel-water-cutting.png


lolz but it shouldnt have crashed downwards like all the foundation broke.....although the plane crashed at the top stories....

12003962_701948766572796_8872160398782920073_n.png

That reminds me, isn't the planes made of aluminum? That account for the fact the plane debris is gone which melted?

I never blamed the people....Got too many good friends there....

but the policies and establishment is def questionable!


@Oldman1 Just something by some American


@Indos

Somewhere in UK:

BBC Foreknowledge of 9/11 Collapse of WTC Building Seven: British Man Won Law Suit against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

Not sure why BBC a foreign news organization needs to report that WTC building 7 collapsed before it actually collapsed. Unless they were informed that it could collapsed.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom