8 Pakistani cities feature in world's deadliest cities index

[Psychic]

Sukkur and Hasu Khel? Never heard of any bomb blasts in Sukkur.

There was just one blast in sukker at isi office 2 years back and was a small blast. Hassu khel well I dont know of any blast or attack there.

hey hey pindi and isb ? that's too much !

Many attacks happened in past 8,9 years altogether, may be it is about the collective result, not just recent.

 

[coffee_cup]

Yeah Tribune....yeah...something to cheer about...yuhu! Got another chance to report negative about Pakistan! Now we can write something in our weekly status report to ask for more dollars....yuhu!

Wait for Dawn and Geo to follow.

 

[Hiptullha]

Its about terrorist attack, not target or sectarian killings.

Target killings or sectarian killings are not terrorist?

 

[K M Cariappa]

Hey Islamabad is in the list of both most Beautiful and the Deadliest city... Irony at its peek....

 

[Indus Falcon]

It's not media, it's "Mudea"

 

[DRaisinHerald]

Islamabad

 

[Butchcassidy]

Target killings or sectarian killings are not terrorist?

There is a difference genius, target killers do not target the STATE.

 

[Hiptullha]

There is a difference genius, target killers do not target the STATE.

Target killers have attacked policemen (who enforce the laws of the state) countless times.

And since when did terrorism =/= violence against the state?

Terrorism is commonly defined as violent acts (or the threat of violent acts) intended to create fear (terror), perpetrated for an economic,[1] religious, political, or ideological goal, and which deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (e.g., neutralmilitary personnel or civilians). Another common definition sees terrorism as political, ideological or religious violence by non-state actors.

This is the definition I've heard all my life.

 

[Butchcassidy]

Target killers have attacked policemen (who enforce the laws of the state) countless times.

And since when did terrorism =/= violence against the state?

This is the definition I've heard all my life.

Mere bhai in the article it mentions " lilelihood of terror attacks based on historic trends"
Obviously they must have defined what a terrorist attack constitutes before analyzing the data. And most possibly they did not consider sectarian, ethnic or target killing as constituting terror attack

 

[Dubious]

Target killings or sectarian killings are not terrorist?

It happens only in india...

lilelihood of terror attacks based on historic trends"

Even then Rawalpindi doesnt fit in

 

[Hiptullha]

Mere bhai in the article it mentions " lilelihood of terror attacks based on historic trends"
Obviously they must have defined what a terrorist attack constitutes before analyzing the data. And most possibly they did not consider sectarian, ethnic or target killing as constituting terror attack

Do you think they'd consider the attack on Ismailis or the bomb blast in the Shia mosque a terrorist attack?

 

[pakdefender]

Jew York Times at it again

 

[Butchcassidy]

It happens only in india...


Even then Rawalpindi doesnt fit in

Well then send a rebuttal to the person who wrote the article

Do you think they'd consider the attack on Ismailis or the bomb blast in the Shia mosque a terrorist attack?

Well only the person who analyzed the data can tell you that

 

[Dubious]

Well then send a rebuttal to the person who wrote the article

Some one in the media team might...But an indian def shouldnt comment on things that they know not off ...

Thank you and good bye!

 

[Butchcassidy]

Some one in the media team might...But an indian def shouldnt comment on things that they know not off ...

Thank you and good bye!

Welcome and good bye