Novice09
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2009
- Messages
- 2,802
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
The amry is in, and if action taken more problems will come for India
Do you want to say that sit idle
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The amry is in, and if action taken more problems will come for India
One thing For Sure the Govt. is in action and this moiast problem will be solved, just as LTTE problem was. The Bigger threat comes form Fire Buring Accross the Border,
I don't understand when Mr Home Minister says that we won't use lethal forces against our own people (Naxals). How fukin stupid that sounds? Police force is not a lethal force?
We won't use Army against them?
Very Nettling....
If an Army man fires a gun it is lethal otherwise it is not.. sad joke..
What you are doing is not contributing to enhancing your reputation.
According to you everyone but you is paid off by some "blood sucking capitalist" somewhere.
You accuse people of being on the take as if that is the only reason to have a different point of view from your own.
So it's no longer just Chidambaram; it has to be all of his cabinet colleagues(except maybe mamatha) including the PM, the BJP, the BJD and horror of horrors the CPI(M) who are all on the payroll of the "Capitalists" since surely all of them could not possibly be working on making Chidambaram's retirement a more comfortable one which was the gist of your earlier argument.
You can put forward your point of view without necessarily reducing yourself to name calling all those who hold a different view
Let's have an even tempered discussion on the politics of this matter on another thread about the validity or otherwise of your arguments.
Don't dishonour the sacrifice of these men and their families by resorting to point scoring.
(BTW I hope your exams went of well though i'm hoping you are not pursuing political science.)
I think the best solution is to Kill 'em' All. Kick Communist Butt, put all Pseudo-intellectuals in Jail by Pulling them out of their A/C rooms!!
Thrash them so hard that they forget about revolution and beg for mercy, its been long that GOI especially Congress have been FOOLed by these agents on the payroll of leftist lobbies, these Pseudo-intellectuals get two on the Butt will forget not just about Kranti , but Mao, Stalin, Marx, Lenin, Socialism etc etc
Again I will raise the same point-My reputation? and what pray would a newbie know of my reputation?
Quote me exactly where i said that..
No, the majority of Indian members here have a different opinion than me. The reason is not that you're "on the take" but because subconsciously, members are being brainwashed by the media which is presenting a one-sided view of the conflict, without giving us all the facts.
Do you wish to know another fact? All media houses and human rights activist's are banned from entering dantewada without prior permission. Are we living in a democratic society? On what basis can the government issue such a ban? What do they have to hide?
The Media is not "on the take" but definitely is being pressured to ignore operation greenhunt. Why is this a surprise to you? Media channels and newspapers run on advertising. Just turn on any media channel and see the number of ads. This is their revenue stream. And who owns the ads? "Blood sucking capitalists"
It should be front page news, instead the last few months we have been bombarded by bs news every single day - IPL, Sania Mirza, etc etc. The only time now that the media talks of the naxals is when there is maoist attack. and even then we have to listen to the same old commentary of "Red terror" .Where is the coverage on the tribals? why aren't we being shown the opposite point of view? Why isnt the media talking about the reasons the tribals are taking up arms against the state? Why isnt there an introspection of the kind of economic policies that we have followed in these areas in the last decade which has resulted in greater impoverishment? Why isnt the Media equally critical of state violence against the tribals? The media is supposed to be fair and balanced. Is this really a fair and balanced coverage?
Wait, politicians on the take is news to you? We are talking of Indian politicians here. They are routinely caught on camera taking bribes - former BJP president Bangaru Laxman an example. As recently as last year MPs were accused of selling their vote in crores to vote in favour of the nuclear deal. The entire cabinet and the opposition may not be on the payroll, but there is not doubt about the fact our dear PM and home minister want to make sure the dormant mining deals become active before their term ends. As to why, you can make up your own minds.
Name calling? I have backed up all assertions with arguments. What name calling are you talking of?
Open another thread if you wish. Doesnt really matter on which thread we debate this.
Empty rhetoric. Stop trumpeting some pseudo-nationalistic sentiment. This is a thread on the internet. There is no reason to hold candle light vigils here.
Secondly, the only people dishonoring those who have fallen are you lot. By calling for "blood", revenge, etc, you people are essentially saying that it doesnt matter how many more die but the naxals need to be annihilated now. Do you want more coffins? more grieving families? more suffering? Do you people not get that you can't defeat the Naxals through violence? That bringing in more forces will result in greater alienation and hence greater support for them? What will you do then, call for the annihilation of the Tribals?
I want all kinds of violence in these areas to end. The only way that can happen is by ending operation greenhunt, pulling out troops and holding talks with the Naxals. Both sides need to abjure violence, not just one. The government should also look into the demands the Naxals have made for talks to commence, not all of them are really that unreasonable.
My exams are going badly because i spend more time on the net than studying my texts. And no, i'm not pursuing a political science degree. Trust me, someone doing a M.A in pol science would be able to explain the situation better than a literature student who uses rhetoric.