boris
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2011
- Messages
- 762
- Reaction score
- 0
One words - Pictures?
Same here i do not think that there will be serious repercussions in the muslim world according to obama if the pics are released.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One words - Pictures?
well they can just officially enlist pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorismits not about blind patriotism ... allegations and soild evidences are two different things
no one saw OBL living their not even the residents of that areas and street ...........
and everyone knows that USA wants to portray Pakistan army and ISI as pro terrorism and they can go to any limit to prove it by any means ............
1st they said OBL was in wazirastan , then they said OBL living in somewhere in mountains and sometimes they claimed they killed him and last time they claimed they killed him in abbottabad
so they pressed the alarm button to let know the PA to tell them they came in and got out so the next time PA can be prepared.100% think so that he was not OBL. but juz an rehersal by US to attack Pakistan Assets... US Marine entered in our territory to judge the interception/counter attack by Pakistani FOrces and nothing else.
Again, what about the 85% of Americans who thought Iraq had WMDs? What kind of nonsense hypocrisy is this?
bizarre that they showed picture of Uday and Qusay Husseins mangled, battered bodies (before and after the 'makeup session')
they showed Abu Mosab Al Zarqawi's bloodied face (after he was killed in 500lb JDAM airstrike)
doesnt it make sense --for the sake of 'closure' to show bin ladens picture, of him dead? I mean, don't tell me you are doing it out of 'sensitivities' and most certainly don't tell me you are trying not to make him look like martyr (like they did with Saddam Hussein, when they hanged him on Eid ul Adha)
Not much wrong with majority of the Pakistanis believing it was not Osama.
The proof and details, on which the operation was justified, were provided to the ISI and the Army. None of those details and proofs was shared with the general public. Why should we expect the people to go beyond common sense?
However, simply because no proof was brought out to light we should not conclude it was not Osama.
The reactions of the Army, and the ISI, and the government, to the operation tell us that either the Pakistani establishment was complicit with the Americans in some sort of covert operation in Abbotabad, or indeed Osama was there and got killed.
Why would the ISI or the Army need to hold Osama's wife, or others (like that 'fake' polio doctor charged with treason) who helped the Americans in the operation? The Army and the ISI won't go that far if it were not Osama who was killed.
Finally, the US undertook such risky operation, which failed in part (owing to the stealth copter crashing) and brought the bilateral relations to the lowest level... to gain what? Anything less than Osama would defeat the purpose.
The relationship between the US and Pakistan appear more of enemies these days, so why does the Pakistani Army not bring forth and share with public the proof and all that was provided to them in the aftermath of the operation?
Either the Army is complicit (with the Americans), or indeed Osama was there.