What's new

50 dead, in Philippines worst military air disaster.

ARJ-21 wings were designed by Antonov Ukraine, fuselage Fokker, composites Evonik Germany. air frame Arconic US, actuation Collins US.......passenger and cheerleaders made in China:china:
LoL.. Using fake source to self satisfy itself. Like claiming how China steal US 5G. Or China getting assist from Russia on how to do a Mars landing with rovers.. oh wait, Russia haven't successfully landed on Mars with Rover. :rofl:
 
.
LoL.. Using fake source to self satisfy itself. Like claiming how China steal US 5G. Or China as from Russia assist on how to do a Mars landing with rovers.. oh wait, Russia haven't successfully landed on Mars with Rover. :rofl:

next time you brag do your research dear. Not my fault you picked the wrong thing to brag about.
and yes don't fly ARJ-21 its mostly American...take the train :enjoy:
 
.
next time you brag do your research dear. Not my fault you picked the wrong thing to brag about.
and yes don't fly ARJ-21 its mostly American...take the train :enjoy:
It's u who need to do research and back your words with hard facts when claim about ARJ-21 need to consult antonov Ukraine for it's wing design.
 
.
It's u who need to do research and back your words with hard facts when claim about ARJ-21 need to consult antonov Ukraine for it's wing design.

Do you want keep digging? Or, cut your losses?

Antonov has been contracted by China Aviation Industry I (AVIC I) to develop a supercritical aerofoil wing for the planned ARJ21 regional jet. The deal was confirmed at this month's Airshow China in Zuhai (Flight International, 12-18 November).

The Ukrainian design bureau will be responsible for optimising the ARJ21's wing and constructing windtunnel models. Development of the ARJ21 should be completed in the middle of next year, with service entry in 2006.


 
.
Do you want keep digging? Or, cut your losses?

Antonov has been contracted by China Aviation Industry I (AVIC I) to develop a supercritical aerofoil wing for the planned ARJ21 regional jet. The deal was confirmed at this month's Airshow China in Zuhai (Flight International, 12-18 November).

The Ukrainian design bureau will be responsible for optimising the ARJ21's wing and constructing windtunnel models. Development of the ARJ21 should be completed in the middle of next year, with service entry in 2006.

LoL.. monkey source. No credible about China aviation. Try harder.

Just like saying China steal US 5G. :lol:
 
.
LoL.. monkey source. No credible about China aviation. Try harder.

Just like saying China steal US 5G. :lol:



支线客机来说 ARJ-21,安东诺夫公司为其设计出了独一无二的机翼,但是中方从未在任何场合提及乌

so don’t waste my time and ask for a Chinese source :lol:
 
.
We can fly it from other companies engines. And China can do back up.

Lmao , still doesn't make the aircraft fully Chinese
LoL.. monkey source. No credible about China aviation. Try harder.

Just like saying China steal US 5G. :lol:

COPIUM , your MUH HUH INDIDENOUS AIRCRAFT is more foreign than Chinese

If the dam engine's are foreign , already 50% of the dam plane is foreign since without it you can't fly it
 
.
So you think an aircraft that was in operation for 33 years before it was handed over to the Philippines was made defective 33 years ago?An aircraft type that logged more than 60 million hours of flight since it first left the production line?

Wake me up when China is able to make an aircraft that hundreds of countries buy and operate for many decades with the lowest attrition rate for a military aircraft after logging more than 60 million hours. It's not going to happen in your lifetime. :lol:
So we are not allowed to mention that this specific aircraft handed over to the Philippines by the USA in January 2021, not even 1 year ago is Made in America? Not even if the same Made in America aircraft type logged two other crashes in the Phillipines? Just because even the mere consideration of a flaw in a supposedly flawless record, doesnt fit into the picture of your, exactly like this, demonstrably false framing and narrations, cheerleading for American and trolling all day about China, so much you'd flood a thread about an American made aircraft crash with it? Of course you'd like that. We all know how you would react if "just 50%" of the crashed aircraft was Made in China, rather than just asking to wait for a fact based investigation before shifting blame on the non-American pilots or non-American engineers.

Or do you actually try to argue that Americas practice of collecting protection money from weaker nations with forced sales of their old garbage at horrendous prices, is actually truly just an expression of American goodwill handing flawless and even "tried" aircraft to other nations at discounted prices also out of sheer goodwill rather than continuing to use their still flawless aircraft themself until the end of their purely formal and not actually technically necessary shelftime?

And we are still not allowed to mention that the pilots, which American fanboys all over American state controlled media platforms blame for the crash without any shred of evidence, were actually seasoned professionals with hundreds of flight hours logged on heavy lifters, because you actually think stating simple facts about this American made aircraft and speaking out against baseless accusations against the deceased is .... insulting the deceased?

What is even the point of this emotional appeal in first place? Did you trolls not read your memo before operating on this board? This isnt Twitter or the YouTube comment section. This is a defence forum.
 
Last edited:
.
So we are not allowed to mention that this specific aircraft handed over to the Philippines by the USA in January 2021, not even 1 year ago is Made in America? Not even if the same Made in America aircraft type logged two other crashes in the Phillipines? Just because even the mere consideration of a flaw in a supposedly flawless record, doesnt fit into the picture of your, exactly like this, demonstrably false framing and narrations, cheerleading for American and trolling all day about China, so much you'd flood a thread about an American made aircraft crash with it? Of course you'd like that. We all know how you would react if "just 50%" of the crashed aircraft was Made in China, rather than just asking to wait for a fact based investigation before shifting blame on the non-American pilots.

Or do you actually try to argue that Americas practice of collecting protection money from weaker nations with forced sales of their old garbage at horrendous prices, is actually truly just an expression of American goodwill handing flawless and even "tried" aircraft to other nations at discounted prices also out of sheer goodwill rather than continuing to use their still flawless aircraft themself until the end of their purely formal and not actually technically necessary shelftime?

And we are still not allowed to mention that the pilots, which American fanboys all over American state controlled media platforms blame for the crash without any shred of evidence, were actually seasoned professionals with hundreds of flight hours logged on heavy lifters, because you actually think stating simple facts about this American made aircraft and speaking out against baseless accusations against the deceased is .... insulting the deceased?

What is even the point of this emotional appeal in first place? Did you trolls not read your memo before operating on this board? This isnt Twitter or the YouTube comment section. This is a defence forum.

Again do you have proof that a manufacturing defect caused the crash? You put up this giant wall of incoherent text but fail to answer one simple question. Did a Made in America flaw cause the crash? Can you prove it? The aircraft crashed a year after it was handed over to the Philippines but the same aircraft operated without incident for 33 years. So what changed? The operator, the first place the investigators will focus on is the pilot and then the maintenance record.
 
.
In their American regime controlled echochambers American shills are already left and right blaming pilot error on seasoned pilots with hundreds of flight hours in these very same machines before the investigation started and footage was released, because dare someone even consider the posibility that Made In America planes sold to the Phillipines could have defects or deficits not befitting their horrendous prices after the third crash for the same machine.

But I guess negative ratings on posts merely stating objective facts is all the paid American shills are going to leavex on a board where people know some **** about the subject and can't be easily fooled by completely baseless accussations and false narrativse trying to cut the story short.
some US worshipper deleted my post about the question for Made in America ,is it made in China?Will this be deleted to0? wait and see.
It is absolute fact that the US aircraft was the death coffin for not 1-2 but 50 Filipino soldier;imagine the hue and cry if the aircraft was Chinese made.
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom