What's new

5 FC personal killed in balochistan

. .
RIP.

Looks like Pakistan ko qurbano dene ki aadat ho ai hai, if it was other way around... mortars...
 
. .
Nah just 6000 plus who died fighting against pakhtun fighters.

Or thousand others who died fighting against Kashmiri/Sikh/Maoist/North East tribals/ Pakistanis/ Chinese etc etc.
 
. . . .
RIP .. WE should treat smugglers the way we treat terrorist .
that will be wrong. if we treat smugglers like we treat terrorists then we will see the smiling smugglers with flowers smiling with victory signs to the cameras
we should treat the smugglers like Iran treats them. summary trials and executions on the same time.
 
.
RIP brave FC personals.

Those oil smugglers seemed trained in militant acts. or may I they were escorted by professionals!

Interception technique should be re-visited.
So its all our fault !

we should treat the smugglers like Iran treats them. summary trials and executions on the same time.

You the reputation of Iranian judiciary within Iran and beyond?
 
.
RIP brave FC personals.

Those oil smugglers seemed trained in militant acts. or may I they were escorted by professionals!


So its all our fault !



You the reputation of Iranian judiciary within Iran and beyond?
hell with the reputation give a break to your special love for the ayatullahs i am interested in results. they treat smugglers like pests
we make them our leaders and let them ruin our lives.

case in point hanif abasi
upload_2017-12-31_22-49-29.png
 
.
its time Iran should do more and stop its agencies from using black market and our soil to avert sanctions.

Sanctions are only on selling oil, where China is taking Iranian oil in barter trade fashion.
Whereas there are no limits what Iran can't import, Iran just need to declare that imported material was not for enriching Uranium. China /Russia wouldn't ask for any such declaration!

hell with the reputation give a break to your special love for the ayatullahs i am interested in results. they treat smugglers like pests
we make them our leaders and let them ruin our lives.

case in point hanif abasi
View attachment 445780

Results on which strategy? I don't know of any? Smugglers is a small word for those who transport oil tanks from Iran to Pakistan from decades.
Pakistan have its own issues but that's not the topic of discussion.
I give a dam to ayatollah and mulla.
 
.
we dont blaame you, its just your PM who says we will support Baluchistan movements and your BJP chief who says we should break pakistan in four and your RAW chief who say we use money to support TTP..remeber we talking about undisputed terrority last i check india doesnt claim baluchistan
Isn't this true for you too my friend??
I have seen Kashmir as a part of India since I was 4 and started my LKG, then I came to know about the wars fought for this land and then I came to know about proxy war between RAW and ISI...
A simple reason or an act is enough to start a never ending war....
 
.
Isn't this true for you too my friend??
I have seen Kashmir as a part of India since I was 4 and started my LKG, then I came to know about the wars fought for this land and then I came to know about proxy war between RAW and ISI...
A simple reason or an act is enough to start a never ending war....

correct and you are welcome to do proxy war in Kashmir as much as you want but should not touch settled areas

I DOUBT we are doing anything now, if we are its very crappy work..

honestly we both know that know india doesnt has any support in kashmir, i doubt we have any strong support too(they want independence),

so it would be much easier if we start really arming them but we are not otherwise ,they would have been people dying every other day, we probably did it briefly in 1980s and 90s and hence the 20,000 killings

but are we supporting the other 25 + movements that are actually amounting to most of deaths of indian arm personel(jsut go and check your figures) the answer is no

so how come a supported movement performs poor than unsupported movements in terms of damage, the answer is they are not getting any support

THIS WHOLE PROXY WAR COMES FROM INDIAN BOOK

people ignore that its actually the 1971 war not the Kashmir issue that defines india Pakistan relationships

1971 war means Pakistan went nuclear, it measn that we start proxy war in punjab and kashmir in the past and it means that we look at india with suspicion

before 1965 most of the boarders between us were open but last nail was 1971

i am sure had their been no proxy war of 1971 SAARC would have been like european union

because hoenstly if development comes in pakistan, india areas that dont want will leave the unions as we saw in europe, be it a pakistani province or an indian province


looking at picture now this wount happen, as after 1971 both countries promoted extremism towards the other country..india did it before 1971 to fuel that war
 
.
correct and you are welcome to do proxy war in Kashmir as much as you want but should not touch settled areas

I DOUBT we are doing anything now, if we are its very crappy work..

honestly we both know that know india doesnt has any support in kashmir, i doubt we have any strong support too(they want independence),

so it would be much easier if we start really arming them but we are not otherwise ,they would have been people dying every other day, we probably did it briefly in 1980s and 90s and hence the 20,000 killings

but are we supporting the other 25 + movements that are actually amounting to most of deaths of indian arm personel(jsut go and check your figures) the answer is no

so how come a supported movement performs poor than unsupported movements in terms of damage, the answer is they are not getting any support

THIS WHOLE PROXY WAR COMES FROM INDIAN BOOK

people ignore that its actually the 1971 war not the Kashmir issue that defines india Pakistan relationships

1971 war means Pakistan went nuclear, it measn that we start proxy war in punjab and kashmir in the past and it means that we look at india with suspicion

before 1965 most of the boarders between us were open but last nail was 1971

i am sure had their been no proxy war of 1971 SAARC would have been like european union

because hoenstly if development comes in pakistan, india areas that dont want will leave the unions as we saw in europe, be it a pakistani province or an indian province


looking at picture now this wount happen, as after 1971 both countries promoted extremism towards the other country..india did it before 1971 to fuel that war
As I said it's a never ending struggle, somebody has to either leave the ego or get destroyed and go back 20-30 years...
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom