What's new

44 % of the Turkish public supports purchase of S-400, 81 % see the U.S. as a threat

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
Nearly half of Turks favor purchase of S-400 missiles: Survey

July 04 2019

Nearly half of the Turkish public is in favor of purchasing the S-400 anti-ballistic missiles from Russia despite sanction threats from the United States, according to a poll released on July 4.

One of the most important questions asked in this year’s poll conducted by Kadir Has University since 2015 was “In view of the U.S. and NATO’s objections to the purchase of weapon systems from Russia and U.S.’s threat to implement sanctions against Turkey, should Turkey purchase S400 missiles from Russia?”

Some 44 percent said it should, while 24.9 percent said it should not. However, 31.1 percent said they had no idea.

While supporters of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) topped the list with 49.6 percent in favor of the purchase, 43.7 percent of main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) supporters said Turkey should go ahead with the purchase. Some 48.1 percent of high school graduates are in favor of the S-400 purchase and 44.3 percent of university graduates are as well.

One of the key findings of the poll is the public’s perception of what the most important foreign policy issue is. Relations with the U.S. topped the list this year as the most important issue, with nearly half of the respondents saying ties will worsen in the future.

The poll also aimed at measuring the knowledge of respondents about Turkish foreign policy issues. When asked “Did you previously hear about the S-400? If yes, can you explain what the S-400 is?” nearly half the respondents gave the correct answer. Some 19.6 percent said it was a missile, 10 percent said it is a Russian missile and 9.3 percent said it is an air defense system. At least 37.4 percent said they had never heard of it. Similarly nearly half of the respondents gave a correct answer to what the F-35 fighter jet is, but 41.1 percent said they had never heard of it.

The poll shows a stark contrast in the perception on relations with the U.S. and Russia.

A striking 81 percent of the respondents said the U.S. constitutes a threat to Turkey, a jump from 60.2 percent in 2018. Russia ranked 12th among countries seen as threats with 44.2 percent, coming after countries like France, England and Germany.

Asked who they thought Turkey’s friends were, Russia ranked 14th, coming after countries like Iran, Venezuela and Ukraine, while the U.K., U.S. and France were at the bottom of the list, with less than 5 percent of the respondents saying they are friends. Even Greece, drawing 10.5 percent and with which Turkey has had several unsolved problems throughout decades, ranked higher than Germany. Only 9.3 percent believe Germany is a friend of Turkey.

According to the poll, the Turkish public has an overall positive perception on relations with Russia, as 55 percent of the respondents used positive description of the ties with Moscow. Some 26,1 percent of the respondents said there is strategic partnership with Russia, 13.4 percent said there is close cooperation and 16.3 said there is cooperation. According to 24 percent of the respondents, there is neither cooperation nor problems. Some 11.1 percent used negative description, with 4.6 percent saying relations are hostile and 6.5 percent saying there are problems with Moscow.

By contrast, the perception on relations with the U.S. is highly negative, as only 24.1 percent of the respondents used affirmative descriptions. Some 39.4 said the U.S. is not trustable and 13 percent said it is an enemy country. Only 14.5 percent said it is a strategic partner, while 2.2 percent said it is a friendly country and an ally.

The differences on political party basis were slim in terms of viewing the U.S. as not trustable. While around 42 percent of AKP and İYİ (Good) Party said the U.S. is not trustable, these figures were around 39 percent for CHP and National Movement Party (MHP) supporters.

Turks against normalization with Israel

There is a similar consensus among supporters of different political parties on what they think of normalization of relations with Israel. Half of the respondents said they are against it, while 23.2 percent said they are in favor of normalization. Some 51.2 percent of supporters of the CHP ranked first in the list of those against normalization followed by voters of the MHP (51.1), AKP (49.7) and Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) 49.5.

While 20.6 percent of the respondents said relations with the U.S. were the most important foreign policy issue, 18.3 said cross-border operations against terrorism were important. Syria also appears to be seen as one of the most important foreign policy issues, as 12 percent sees the war in Syria as an important foreign policy issue, followed by 10.5 percent who believe the presence of the PYD in Syria is as crucial.

Some 39.6 percent said Turkish-U.S. relations will evolve in a negative direction, while only 7.3 percent said they will improve. Some 37 percent said they will not change.

While there is positive perception on relations with Russia, the public seems to be aware of the problems with Russia on issues like Syria’s future, regional energy resources and the fight against terrorism. Half of the respondents said there are differences in opinion between the two or that they are rivals on those issues.

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/nearly-half-of-turks-favor-purchase-of-s-400-missiles-survey-144704
 
. .
If the results of this poll are a true representation of how Turkish nationals perceive members of NATO bloc such as US, UK and France, then it is really puzzling for Turkey to be a member of NATO bloc.

Well done Tayyip Erdogan.
 
.
If the results of this poll are a true representation of how Turkish nationals perceive members of NATO bloc such as US, UK and France, then it is really puzzling for Turkey to be a member of NATO bloc.

Well done Tayyip Erdogan.
There is no purpose of Turkey being in NATO. How much can they really help in a war with Russia which will be much less bloody than a war with the Soviet Union? The war will probably turn nuclear which is actually worse for Turkey. This isnt 1952, its 2019 and there is no more Cold war and there will never be another one.
 
. .
There is no purpose of Turkey being in NATO. How much can they really help in a war with Russia which will be much less bloody than a war with the Soviet Union? The war will probably turn nuclear which is actually worse for Turkey. This isnt 1952, its 2019 and there is no more Cold war and there will never be another one.

simply , Turkey can't take 1/10 of pressure that West can put on them , so they just want use S-400 as a card in their negotiation with USA ...
 
.
if we are not gonna disassemble the s400 and the rocket engines and so on.. than we are idiots .. same for f16 engine and other engines..

if you dont try to learn how it works and at least reverse engeneer it.. than count any bad names you wish...

the german firm I am working with does the same.. so do most.. buy other products learn from it take some advantages for you products and copy.. you dont have to invent the whole thing again..
 
.
if we are not gonna disassemble the s400 and the rocket engines and so on.. than we are idiots .. same for f16 engine and other engines..

if you dont try to learn how it works and at least reverse engeneer it.. than count any bad names you wish...

the german firm I am working with does the same.. so do most.. buy other products learn from it take some advantages for you products and copy.. you dont have to invent the whole thing again..

Turkey really should use its geopolitical advantages to gain concessions from all however Erdogan is kinda erratic in foreign policy every few years he pisses of the Russians then gets along same with the Americans and the Chinese
 
.
98% of the Turkish population doesnt know what a S400 system is. They are under heavy propaganda, RUSSIA is much worse than any western country. turkey should stick with NATO.
Agreed, they see something that says the S-400 is better than the F-35 without knowing what either are. There are many other options for SAM systems from China, and other nations but nothing can compete with the F-35 for now.
 
.
There is no purpose of Turkey being in NATO.

This sentence alone is proving that your knowledge about history, purpose and reasoning behind the Turkish membership in this military alliance is practically non existent. Mr. Erdoğan will be dead if he actually decides to leave Nato. This is how important Turkey's NATO membership is for the Western world.
 
.
This sentence alone is proving that your knowledge about history, purpose and reasoning behind the Turkish membership in this military alliance is practically non existent. Mr. Erdoğan will be dead if he actually decides to leave Nato. This is how important Turkey's NATO membership is for the Western world.
Any real sources to back up your info? Turkish nationalism makes me cringe so hard.
 
. .
if we are not gonna disassemble the s400 and the rocket engines and so on.. than we are idiots .. same for f16 engine and other engines..

if you dont try to learn how it works and at least reverse engeneer it.. than count any bad names you wish...

the german firm I am working with does the same.. so do most.. buy other products learn from it take some advantages for you products and copy.. you dont have to invent the whole thing again..
S-400 is 30-40 year old technology.

Engine - simple single pulse solid engine.
Guidance - simple guidance through missile.
Radar - old PESA radar.
 
.
S-400 is 30-40 year old technology.

Engine - simple single pulse solid engine.
Guidance - simple guidance through missile.
Radar - old PESA radar.
TBH, Turkey could make its own SAM system that rivals the S-400 with some foreign assistance. Turkey couldn't make a plane that rivals the F-35 or even comes close though.
 
.
TBH, Turkey could make its own SAM system that rivals the S-400 with some foreign assistance. Turkey couldn't make a plane that rivals the F-35 or even comes close though.

We are working on both Hisar and Siper program and we are part of Eurosam... But it takes years to develop this systems and we need a proven platform. You know, Mediterranean gas... And Syria... S-400 will be a good stop-gap solution.

About F-35, ''couldnt'' is a big word... F-35 is kind of unique right now and We have just started. France-Germany and Britain just started... Let see what will happen after 2030's... I believe you will be proven wrong.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom