400 to 600 fighter jets and bombers air raids

[Trango Towers]

You will get slapped hard

OK will you send 400 f16?

 

[baqai]

I saw the photo of United states of America 400 to 600 fighter jets and bombers air raids in 1944. Mustangs, spitfires, bombers planes and others

USA has been doing all that since 1940. After 70 years big countries like China and India cannot think of a single air raid with 400+ war planes. Asia has been adding people only (3.5 billion people), poverty, low technology.

America is Number #1 in military and development for some good reasons. America can fly 25,000 fighter jets (F-16 and above) in full scale wars and BIG wars.

Example: India has only 240 Sukhoi -30 fighter jets as show of force.

Captain America got his *** whopped by Captain Vietnam and last i checked things aren't that rosey in Afghanistan as well aren't we discussing talks with Taliban eh? get a reality check get out of your superiority complex coz everything you freaking make has components made in either China or Taiwan, the only thing America seems to export is it's version of democracy and freedom

 

[Marker]

I saw the photo of United states of America 400 to 600 fighter jets and bombers air raids in 1944. Mustangs, spitfires, bombers planes and others

USA has been doing all that since 1940. After 70 years big countries like China and India cannot think of a single air raid with 400+ war planes. Asia has been adding people only (3.5 billion people), poverty, low technology.

America is Number #1 in military and development for some good reasons. America can fly 25,000 fighter jets (F-16 and above) in full scale wars and BIG wars.

Example: India has only 240 Sukhoi -30 fighter jets as show of force.

Difference between today's and WW2 aerial war efforts can be corelate between horse archers vs tanks; catapults vs MRLS and so on. Today one aircraft can carry enough fire power equivalent to 10+ WW2 era bombers. Plus long range missiles and loitering munitions or other high tech weapons do not require in huge quantity as these are precision guided weapons to take down the targets efficiently and effectively with minimum collateral damage .

Now four to six aircraft package is enough to take down well defended strategic targets.

 

[shanlung]

Captain America got his *** whopped by Captain Vietnam and last i checked things aren't that rosey in Afghanistan as well aren't we discussing talks with Taliban eh? get a reality check get out of your superiority complex coz everything you freaking make has components made in either China or Taiwan, the only thing America seems to export is it's version of democracy and freedom

Actually Murican Army lost almost all the wars they fought in.


Just remember Murica won only 3 wars since WW2, against Nicaragua, Panama and Grenada.
And even though Murica fought against sheep and goat herders in Afghan and Somalia and Iraq and with fire power 100 to 10,000 times greater, Murica lost and lost and lost.

Murica would not have won WW2 but for Zhukov killing the vast bulk of Werhmacht and miltary machinery
leaving Muricans to take on the German invalids on D Day

DDay operations not even 10% of Operation Bagration.
D Day took on 3 to 4 German Division that consisted of the German invalids send from Russia to R & R. And even so, Muricans and Brits had such a hard and difficult time doing that.

Where Soviet Union destroyed 28 of 34 divisions of Army Group Centre and completely shattered the German front line. It was the biggest defeat in German military history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bagration

EVEN WHEN CHINESE GOT JUST SINGLE SHOT BOLT ACTION RIFLES LIKE IN THE KOREAN WAR, THEY CHASED THE FUCKING AMERICANS AND THE 5 EYES AND THE REST OF THE WORLD WITH AMERICA FROM YALU RIVER TO SOUTH OF THE PARALLEL IN UNDER 3 WEEKS WITH THE ANGMOHS SHITTING DOWN THEIR PANTS.


America forgot about WW2 where China with barely any arms from USA and with single shot bolt rifles and swords and bare hands fought and killed 3,000,000 Japanese invaders?

And USA needed no less than aircraft carriers and battleships and planes and artilleries and automatic rifles to kill 300,000 Japs in the Pacific?

And remember that China in WW2 with single shot bolt rifles and 5 bullets to a rifle were the best armed half of the force. And with swords and bare bodies with explosive strapped to them took on and killed 3,000,000 japanese soldiers.

And USA needed no less than aircraft carriers and battleships and planes and artilleries and automatic rifles to kill 300,000 Japs in the Pacific?

"dare to die corps" http://forlornhopesui.blogspot.com/2015/08/dare-to-die-corps.html

Chinese suicide bomber putting on an explosive vest made out of Model 24 hand grenades to use in an attack on Japanese tanks.


The battle involved a Japanese plan to conquer Xuzhou, a major city in the East. However, the Japanese failed to consider the plans of generals Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi, who planned to encircle the Japanese in the town of Tai'erzhuang. The Japanese operation started on 24 March. Overconfidence led the Japanese commanders to overlook the thousands of inconspicuous "farmers" in the area, who were affiliated with Li Zongren and cut communication lines and supplies, diverted streams, and ruined rail lines. By late March, supplies and fuels were being dropped from airplanes to Japanese troops, but the quantities were insufficient.
On 29 March 1938, a small band of Japanese soldiers tunneled under Tai'erzhuang's walls in an attempt to take the city from within. They were caught by the Nationalist defenders and killed. Over the next week, both sides claimed to hold parts of the city and surrounding area, and many were killed in small arms battles.
Finally, the Japanese attacked frontally, failing to consider the greater Chinese numbers. A major encirclement on 6 April, with Chinese reinforcements, preceded a major Japanese defeat and retreat, which the Chinese failed to capitalize upon fully through pursuit due to a lack of mobility.
The Chinese captured 719 Japanese soldiers and large quantities of military supplies, including 31 pieces of artillery, 11 armored cars, 8 armored fighting vehicles, 1,000 machine guns and 10,000 rifles.
A "dare to die corps" was effectively used against Japanese units.
Chinese suicide bomber putting on an explosive vest made out of Model 24 hand grenades to use in an attack on Japanese tanks
Due to lack of anti-armor weaponry, Suicide bombing was also used against the Japanese. Chinese troops strapped explosives like grenade packs or dynamite to their bodies and threw themselves under Japanese tanks to blow them up. Dynamite and grenades were strapped on by Chinese troops who rushed at Japanese tanks and blew themselves up. During one incident at Taierzhuang, Chinese suicide bombers obliterated four Japanese tanks with grenade bundles.
Amid the celebrations of the victory in Hankow and other Chinese cities, Japan tried to deny and ridiculed the reports of the battle for days. It was reported in the world's newspapers, however, and by mid-April had provoked a Cabinet crisis in Tokyo.
The Chinese scored a major victory, the first of the Nationalist alliance in the war. The battle broke the myth of Japanese military invincibility and resulted in an incalculable benefit to Chinese morale.


Japanese learned kamikaze attacks from what the Chinese did to them in China.

And now China weapons are more powerful and reach further and more accurate than that of USA AND ALL HER ALLIES RUNNING DOGS.
And China got much more of those weapons than USA hope to have

Or Korean War where China with single shot bolt action rifles drove USA and all her allies when USA firepower 100 times greater than China and fighting with automatic weapons and artillery and battleships with 16 inch guns .

The military might and strength of USA with heavy artillery and planes and tanks and battleships with 16 inch guns cannot be resisted by China with economy slightly out of stone age and with single shot bolt action rifles. Bolt operated rifles were just one stage above using muzzle loading muskets and black powder.

That Chinese be slaughtered and turned into red pulp should they dare to fight good old Dugout in Korea.

Chinese whacked USA and the UN combined that they had to flee south of the Parallel as demanded by China.Chinese fought with bolt operated rifles against Ma Dueces , automatic weapons and artillery and tanks and planes and chopters and battleships with 16″ guns.

Go read the book by David Halberstam
The Coldest Winter

Look on the front line at 24 Nov 1950 and the front line of 16 Dec 1950.

What was the military edge USA have over a bunch of separate goat herders in Afghan? Do not even need the entire fucking country of Afghan.
10,000 to 1 ?
Or is it the Afghan goat herders have military technology greater than USA??
I finished reading “the Outpost” by Jake Tapper. How a bunch of goat herders in Afghan with AKs and rpgs and IEDs (because they do not have billion dollar industry to make bombs like USA, can only make bombs in backyard on a DIY basis) taking out USA brave men despite they having 155 howizters , 120 mm mortars , Ma Deuces, A-10s, properly build bombs, B52s and helicopter gunships , AC-130 Spectre Gunships and billions of dollars backing them and not so good in protecting them.
If USA fought bravely with massive firepower behind them, then what about the goat herders with only AKs and RPGs fighting against USA knowing they fighting against 155 howizters , 120 mm mortars , Ma Deuces, A-10s, properly build bombs, B52s and helicopter gunships , AC-130 Spectre Gunships ?
Even more fucking brave is the least I can say of the Afghans goat herders. Who were untrained knowing only how to herd goats unlike the USA special forces who went through countless hours and weeks and months learning how to kill and kill.
Yet who won? And who left Afghan?
Maybe USA army should consider making their fighting folks do a course in goat herding . As who knows, maybe herding goats might be better to build up fighting skills.

USA got fucked when USA tried that in Afghan . Against a bunch of tribesmen when USA had 1000 the firepower over them. And after a trillion of dollars what have USA got to show in Afghan?
Why did the United States of America fail to win the war in Afghanistan even after 17 years? Why does the lone superpower fail to defeat a group of goat herders?
And in Somalia. A bunch of ex fishermen and part time goat herders with nothing more than AKs and RPGs chased USA out running with tail between legs

What military edge USA got in Iraq over Sadr? 1,000 to 1?
Please dont say Murica won Saddam.
It will be like saying Tokyo won after they did Tora Tora Tora

Or is it Sadr got better and more advanced military technology over USA?
In Iraq losing out to Sadr who had 1000 times less firepower than USA.
Having no more than AKs and rpgs.

 

[Liaslia]

Difference between today's and WW2 aerial war efforts can be corelate between horse archers vs tanks; catapults vs MRLS and so on. Today one aircraft can carry enough fire power equivalent to 10+ WW2 era bombers. Plus long range missiles and loitering munitions or other high tech weapons do not require in huge quantity as these are precision guided weapons to take down the targets efficiently and effectively with minimum collateral damage . Now four to six aircraft package is enough to take down well defended strategic targets.

Today there are S-400 missiles, BUK missiles, Those S-300s are also scary. Fighters jets can be mosquitoes now

 

[fitpOsitive]

I saw the photo of United states of America 400 to 600 fighter jets and bombers air raids in 1944. Mustangs, spitfires, bombers planes and others

USA has been doing all that since 1940. After 70 years big countries like China and India cannot think of a single air raid with 400+ war planes. Asia has been adding people only (3.5 billion people), poverty, low technology.

America is Number #1 in military and development for some good reasons. America can fly 25,000 fighter jets (F-16 and above) in full scale wars and BIG wars.

Example: India has only 240 Sukhoi -30 fighter jets as show of force.

Sharab chez hi aisi hai, na chori jaey...

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Today there are S-400 missiles, BUK missiles, Those S-300s are also scary. Fighters jets can be mosquitoes now

50 B-52/B-1b/B-2 could do the same job as your 400-600 bombers, and fighter jets are not comes alone but in Strike packages comes with electronic warfare aircraft/ jamming jets like F-18 E/F growlers etc etc
attacking with 400-600 bombers is stupid and old idea, this is 21st century brother not early mid 20th century

 

[rott]

@Liaslia, I thought my English was bad and Americans have good English. Are you a Chinese immigrant?

 

[Liaslia]

50 B-52/B-1b/B-2 could do the same job as your 400-600 bombers, and fighter jets are not comes alone but in Strike packages comes with electronic warfare aircraft/ jamming jets like F-18 E/F growlers etc etc
attacking with 400-600 bombers is stupid and old idea, this is 21st century brother not early mid 20th century

Bombers fly with the protection of 20 to 30 fighter jets. I have been studying military since 15 years

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Bombers fly with the protection of 20 to 30 fighter jets. I have been studying military since 15 years

they wont escorting look at first gulf war and later fighter jets clean enemy fighter jets then bombers arrived, its the old ww2 strategy/tactics that bombers had been raiding along with fighter escorts,, and fighter jets (multirole jets) and bombers don't need to close to enemy IAD (integrated air defense) weapons because they all have stand off weapons like ALCM/JASSM/JADAM/LRASM etc etc

 

[shanlung]

Bombers fly with the protection of 20 to 30 fighter jets. I have been studying military since 15 years

That study wasted on you.

Seems that you never use your mind to think.

Or perhaps you missing that?

Or you hoping to refight trench warfare next?

 

[Figaro]

Bombers fly with the protection of 20 to 30 fighter jets. I have been studying military since 15 years

Clearly you are delusional or an internet troll. I recommend you study the F-117 Nighthawk, which is the first aircraft that completely contradicts what you are saying. We are not dealing with World War II here or even Vietnam.

 

[Liaslia]

Clearly you are delusional or an internet troll. I recommend you study the F-117 Nighthawk, which is the first aircraft that completely contradicts what you are saying. We are not dealing with World War II here or even Vietnam.

Pussy cat I have been studying military for 15 years

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

You live is your mother's basement ? USA can make 10,000 fighters during full scale war. USA is not India

Thats true USA is not india but USA have more indian national than any other place in world slowly you becoming like them .... incompetence .

 

[fitpOsitive]

And in 21st century, all we need is precision striking missiles... That's it.