What's new

30 Year-Old Soviet Missile Defense Destroys 70% of Trump’s ‘Nice, New, Smart!’ Missiles

Then what for?
May be they are addicts on bombing other countries? If they did not doing it for year or two they have withdrawal syndrome.
I imagine May calling Trump:
- Man, help, you got some? I need it. I will die if not bomb someone.
- Relax, I got something for you. Want Syria?

I think they just do not know how to talk with people who do not agree with them. The only thing they know: "Let's f//king bomb 'em all". Wild West and Wild Westerners just can not imagine that people can talk.
 
Last edited:
.
Turkish newest technology 220+ km SOM-J network enabled stealth Cruise Missile for F35 stealth Fighter Jet


Berkant that is all nice, if it was true..You become like the other PDF’s showing wares that their armies does not possess...
 
.
Berkant that is all nice, if it was true..You become like the other PDF’s showing wares that their armies does not possess...
It is true and who knows maybe a welcome news for Algeria also. You should take a look at Turkish Forum to see what Turkey possess.
 
.
Russia upgraded all Syrian S-75 volkov, S-125 Neva , S-200 Angara systems long time ago.

Just for you this nice article very recently released by someone associated with the Russian MOD:

https://topwar.ru/139908-tehnichesk...o-k-fiasko-krasivyh-i-umnyh-v-nebe-sirii.html

May be they are addicts on bombing other countries? If they did not doing it for year or two they have withdrawal syndrome.
I imagine May calling Trump:
- Man, help, you got some? I need it. I will die if not bomb someone.
- Relax, I got something for you. Want Syria?

I think they just do not know how to talk with people who do not agree with them. The only thing they know: "Let's f//king bomb 'em all". Wild West and Wild Westerners just can not imagine that people can talk.
 
. .
:omghaha: Mullahs and empty Vodka bottle troll are at full swing making stuff up... Where's the shot down missiles parts of 71 tomahawks ???? I bet poor Syrian soldiers collected them for resale[emoji38]
I am sorry but this is true for cheerleaders of Assad (and Russians).

Once again, where is the proof of such outlandish claims? If cruise missiles are that easy to shoot down then why Pakistan wasting its resources with them?

I tell you something; Assad (and Russians) haven't managed to shoot down even Grad rockets of rebels across the battlefield.

Insider sources also claim that Assad (and Russians) are concealing lot of damage.

Dislike the US as much you want but don't play second fiddle to baseless propaganda of its opponents.
I still wonder why there is no chemical leak after such an impersive and successful attack on chemical research centers and storage and weapon factories
It Mus have bean one help of attack .
 
.
Wow

Yet another stupid thread about the absurd claim that Syria failed air defence managed to intercept missiles.

Not a single image of a fallen missile presented , satellite images show that the targets on the grounds where obliterated yet no less than 10 people thought this thread should be rated !

Here are the people that rated this thread :

war&peace
dsr478
Ashik Mahmud
bbccdd1470
Chinese-Dragon
mohammad45
Stranagor
DayWalker
90
oprih
Tokhme khar

Someone should research this phenomenon , whats the motive of so many to support such nonsense. Is it temporary blindness ? inferiority complex ? What is the reason for people to cling on to such utter stupidity rather than facts ?

Suggested reading :

518Nb9heqmL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
.

Here's a message for you from the most successful Major of the Syrian BukM2 battery who brought down 12 tomahawks over Dumayer AFB:

Syrian%2Bsoldiers%2Bafter%2BUS%252C%2BUK%2Band%2BFrench%2BAir%2BStrikes%2B1.jpg


Wow

Yet another stupid thread about the absurd claim that Syria failed air defence managed to intercept missiles.

Not a single image of a fallen missile presented , satellite images show that the targets on the grounds where obliterated yet no less than 10 people thought this thread should be rated !

Here are the people that rated this thread :

war&peace
dsr478
Ashik Mahmud
bbccdd1470
Chinese-Dragon
mohammad45
Stranagor
DayWalker
90
oprih
Tokhme khar

Someone should research this phenomenon , whats the motive of so many to support such nonsense. Is it temporary blindness ? inferiority complex ? What is the reason for people to cling on to such utter stupidity rather than facts ?

Suggested reading :

518Nb9heqmL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Want more pictures of downed tomahawks?......lol......We can keep posting them?

Syrian%2Bsoldiers%2Bafter%2BUS%252C%2BUK%2Band%2BFrench%2BAir%2BStrikes%2B3.jpg


Syrian%2Bsoldiers%2Bafter%2BUS%252C%2BUK%2Band%2BFrench%2BAir%2BStrikes%2B4.jpg
 
.

Wow , a definite proof ! ! !

We know that 70% of the missiles where shot down cause this russian man crew .found them. Yet non of them had a smartphone on him to take an image of even one missiles that the whole Syrian regime would be so happy to show off.

Syrian%2Bsoldiers%2Bafter%2BUS%252C%2BUK%2Band%2BFrench%2BAir%2BStrikes%2B3.jpg


Enough with this lie and stop trying to push on is this image again and again ! this is not a tomahawk missile !
 
.
Time is running out for the US backed terrorists. iran is winning:

Da0-6Q7WAAE90Z_.jpg


aahahahahaaa......lol

Now we will take Yarmouk next, and you can do sweet fukk all. Just watch and cry over your dead rats.......

Last will be Idlib, where we destroy your Zio-wahabbi wet dreams.......bahahahaaaaa.......lol

SyAA preparing to take Yarmouk next:

Da1K0bXVQAYRvju.jpg


Wow , a definite proof ! ! !

We know that 70% of the missiles where shot down cause this russian man crew .found them. Yet non of them had a smartphone on him to take an image of even one missiles that the whole Syrian regime would be so happy to show off.

Syrian%2Bsoldiers%2Bafter%2BUS%252C%2BUK%2Band%2BFrench%2BAir%2BStrikes%2B3.jpg


Enough with this lie and stop trying to push on is this image again and again ! this is not a tomahawk missile !
 
.
:omghaha: Mullahs and empty Vodka bottle troll are at full swing making stuff up... Where's the shot down missiles parts of 71 tomahawks ???? I bet poor Syrian soldiers collected them for resale:lol:
mods why is he allowed to bash mullahs for no reason. do we say anything about their rabbia's
@The Eagle @waz
 
.
I mean forget this US pussy strike that cost 6 buildings, an entrance to a bunker and a parking lot as its achievements..........lol......, The real star over the past few months have been the Russian Pantsir batteries! This is truly amazing:

 
.
I still wonder why there is no chemical leak after such an impersive and successful attack on chemical research centers and storage and weapon factories
It Mus have bean one help of attack .
Chemical weapons were not stored in the 'research facility' in Damascus. However, Americans suspected that its records were crucial to development of chemical weapons.

They destroyed a certified chemical weapons storage facility near Homs but this region was barred from visitors. :azn:
 
.
What was the objective of the missile attacks? Assad is still in power. Spending billions trying to destroy a fake chemical factory?

just to destroy Chem research facility days before UN observer's visit, cause that facility does not have production facility as accused by US and minions
 
.
If this is true, then given the number of cruise missiles destroyed, where are the physical remains?

There are ALWAYS physical evidences of such successes, especially with the quantity claimed. A cruise missile is essentially an aircraft and we have yet to see an aircraft literally turned to vapor after a missile hit.

The bulk of any ground-air missile is the fuel containment system. The exploding warhead is more for proximity fusing purposes, which means it is usually just large enough to produce damages on the target and not to totally destroy it. It is the fuel quantity that gives the impression of bulk on any ground-air missile.

The cruise missiles' arrival would have been at different times and possibly from different directions. That means there should be debris over a wider area since it is unlikely that any cruise missile would be totally vaporized.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom