What's new

30 Hindu temples demolished in Vijayawada

No actually some these construction are decades old,without notice they are demolishing .. actual reason not for ghats but river front proposal from Singapore companies.. they are seeking lands in capital region..
You know, there's always an alternative.
But the government doesn't show the will to opt for an alternative when it comes to the majority...or so I feel.

Are you sure all of these temples are not older than a century???
Did they pop up in last few decades?
 
.
You know, there's other side an alternative.
But the government doesn't show the will to opt for an alternative when it comes to the majority...or so I feel.

Are you sure all of these temples are not older than a century???
Did they pop up in last few decades?


I have idea about some temples but not all.. but these are other side of road..


*** am against demolishing temples without notice or proper reason.. but this guy bring religion everywhere to divert topic... anyhow im just blocked him..

The demolition of temples in the city is snowballing into a major controversy and the latest proposal to reportedly demolish a portion of the historic Vijayeswara Swamy temple located close to Prakasam Barrage has only added fuel to the fire.
A couple of days ago, there were rumours that the Vinayaka temple on the Canal Road would be razed to the ground. The Hindu Dharma Parirakshana Samithi and traders observed bandh in One Town in protest against the proposal on Wednesday. Even as the issue is yet to subside, the Vijayeswara Swamy temple, which is believed to have been consecrated by Arjuna, cropped up, inviting all-round criticism. The temple priests and the samithi performed a homam in the temple premises to make officials and the government ‘see reason,’ here on Thursday.
 
.
*** am against demolishing temples without notice or proper reason.. but this guy bring religion everywhere to divert topic... anyhow im just blocked him
TBH, I'm not against demolishing religious structures which were built recently (meaning not a more than a century old).
In last few decades,plethora of temples,mosques, and other religious structures had popped up.
We dont need so many religious centres you know, these exacerbate the radicalisation of society.
 
.
[QUOTE="Levina, post: 8432657, member: 149, I'm not against demolishing religious structures which were built recently (meaning not a more than a century old).
In last few decades,plethora of temples,mosques, and other religious structures had popped up.
We dont need so many religious centres you know, these exacerbate the radicalisation of society.[/QUOTE]


@Levina
some have historical imp.. . are you aware sadavarthi ( Sathram lands) in chennai city.. each acre sold for 27+ lack to his party men.. 83 acres for 23 crore.. whereas per govt estimation each acre cost 10-12 cr ( govt estimation)..
 
Last edited:
.
Lolz
Do you guyz lock horns often???
This is the 2nd thread today. :lol:

Fighting with Sickulars is a full time job.:D

Demolishing a religious structure is not an issue.
It has been done all over India all the time.
It's about the way Naidu went about it that's the problem.
 
. .
In India,governments are often reticent when it comes to hurting the sentiments of minorities but Hindu sentiments are taken for granted
Please explain why do you think so? This is the second time I would be asking the same question...
 
.
The area where they are demolishing, its a night mare for travellers traffic wise. I am in favor for such demolition. We can always build new temples somewhere else. And those will age as well.
 
.
Please explain why do you think so? This is the second time I would be asking the same question...
Did you read my post that followed???
Try this...
TBH, I'm not against demolishing religious structures which were built recently (meaning not a more than a century old).
In last few decades,plethora of temples,mosques, and other religious structures had popped up.
We dont need so many religious centres you know, these exacerbate the radicalisation of society.
 
.
AP people have little choice.
Cunning & corrupt Naidu
Corrupt & Evangelical Jagan
Corrupt & incompetent Congress

Simply put they are as screwed as Punjabis.

This Naidu would dress up like an Arab for Iftar parties too...
What a shame!

If they wanted to remove temples for expansion of roads, there is a much better way to go about it than what he is doing now....

Why this racist remark ?

Reported
 
.
Why this racist remark ?

Reported

Your comprehension problems are not my issue.
Context was the poor quality of political parties in AP and Punjab.

It was not insulting Punjabis but insulting the political parties in that state.

Anyway how is that remark Racist?


Anyway, reported for reverse racism.
 
.
No actually some these construction are decades old,without notice they are demolishing .. actual reason not for ghats but river front proposal from Singapore companies.. they are seeking lands in capital region..

Amaravati is coming up near Vijayawada?
 
. .
First, the demolition was for road widening.
Second, this is not the first time such a thing as happened.
Third, Masjids and Churches were also demolished.

Amaravati is coming up near Vijayawada?
Amaravati is the land between vijawada and guntur cities.
land marked as AP new capital.
But lately land scams and illegal land grabbing by TDP ministers have seen light.
Amaravathi initial plan is for 30-40 yrs to complete.
Already voices are being raised, that naidu has ignored APs largest City Vizag/Visakhapatnam and doing favors to Vijaywada.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom