2014 is not 1962 - Indian Much Better Prepared for Chinese Challenge

[Chinese-Dragon]

We throw out PLA without firing a bullet. lol

That's the might of IA.

Even you don't believe it.

India begged China to leave, just as they do every time. The Indian Army itself already said they couldn't beat China.

 

[timetravel]

There is a moutain Hymalaya laid between China and India, so no chance a large scale land war breaking out.


Both forces had made huge progress, but i think China is stronger. Be it infrastructure, weapon indigenization rate, production capacity, human resource, operational tactics. I hope no war.

Infrastructure, China > India
Operational Tactics, India >> China
Indeginisation rate doesn't matter both have enough weapons.
Human resource again both have enough number of soldiers.
From Tibet to Nepal to Bhutan, everywhere there is overwhelming people's support for IA.

Overall I would say IA is stronger.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

That's a funny theory.

Doesn't explain why Indian Army posts were North of the MacMahon line, in land they did not even claim.

It was India that started the Forward Policy, not us. We just responded to it, and beat India down. Even a starving China could do that easily.

India did not have the benefit of the GPS at that time. But even then 2 posts across the McMahon Line... that's all that it took (officially) for China to retaliate.Yes, China did beat India down. I don't dispute that.

The PLA was not starving. The peasants in rural China were. Food was appropriated from them as State property. That's what started the famine. The PLA was exactly the opposite of the Indian Army - well supplied, well provisioned, recent battlefield experience and fanatical political soldiers.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Infrastructure, China > India
Operational Tactics, India >> China
Indeginisation rate doesn't matter both have enough weapons.
Human resource again both have enough number of soldiers.
From Tibet to Nepal to Bhutan, everywhere there is overwhelming people's support for IA.

Overall I would say IA is stronger.

The Indian Army already said they have no hope of matching China.

The Indian Army knows more than a bunch of fanboys on the internet.

 

[timetravel]

Even you don't believe it.

India begged China to leave, just as they do every time. The Indian Army itself already said they couldn't beat China.

Oh please... the Chinese lack the guts to hold on to any area. Admit it. Everytime IA comes nearby, PLA scurries back to bunkers.

I don't care talks or no talks, come to me the day PLA officially enters some area and IA lets them stay there permanently.

Till then no one will take PLA seriously.

 

[Established_1965]

My dear Indian friends,

Don't get me wrong but i find that most of the indian young hearts are very skeptical about being Indian.

 

[timetravel]

My dear Indian friends,

Don't get me wrong but i find that most of the indian young hearts are very skeptical about being Indian.

are you sure you are not confused about being Singaporean?

 

[vsdave2302]

From the incidents of Nath La in 1967 and face off of 1987, Situation has reversed. CHina wisely decided to call a falg meeting and decided to back unconditionally to avoid other Nathu La in CHamur.

I hope India is not the same back stabbing opportunist like in 1962, invading when China was starving.

China is ready for Indian adventurism this time, not like in 1962.

From the incident of Chamur, itseems that China is not ready.

I don't think people realize this or not but 2014 not being 1962 applies more to China than India; China can win a war much....much better today against every one of its neighbors if it goes to war than it could in '62.

His master's voice.

 

[帅的一匹]

Infrastructure, China > India
Operational Tactics, India >> China
Indeginisation rate doesn't matter both have enough weapons.
Human resource again both have enough number of soldiers.
From Tibet to Nepal to Bhutan, everywhere there is overwhelming people's support for IA.

Overall I would say IA is stronger.

If there is large scale war, i think IA will run armo shortage. As to overwhelming support to IA, i think no.

 

[vsdave2302]

Even you don't believe it.

India begged China to leave, just as they do every time. The Indian Army itself already said they couldn't beat China.

Who told you? Is Mr. Suhag called you on phone?

If there is large scale war, i think IA will run armo shortage. As to overwhelming support to IA, i think no.

Lots of wishful thinking.

China will soon launch 22 Mars,

After a spectacular Mars mission lasting for 2 days in 2011, i think china may try to launch Mars. Afterall china is a very advance country and building a submarine which can reach US in 1 Hour.

 

[帅的一匹]

Oh please... the Chinese lack the guts to hold on to any area. Admit it. Everytime IA comes nearby, PLA scurries back to bunkers.

I don't care talks or no talks, come to me the day PLA officially enters some area and IA lets them stay there permanently.

Till then no one will take PLA seriously.

It's wild and bold claim. check him, the highest rank IA officer(Bragadier) shot dead during his escape during 1962 conflict.

 

[timetravel]

If there is large scale war, i think IA will run armo shortage. As to overwhelming support to IA, i think no.

Ammo shortage is the last thing in mind. I think the war will be decided way before we come to the stage where the ammo is finished.

Nepal and Bhutan. I don't think there is any doubt, about support for IA??. They are essentially as good as Indian states.
Tibet again you know India has special forces consisting of Tibetans only. When they operate in Tibet, the support for IA will be good.

 

[vsdave2302]

Because India got its behind kicked in 1962, China was already a strong country, not a country in famine, which was the reality.

No china is a weak internally weak country. to hide its wekness it tries to pretend to be a strong country to avaoid any movement like pro democarcy movement in 80s.

 

[timetravel]

It's wild and bold claim. check him, the highest rank IA officer(Bragadier) shot dead during his escape during 1962 conflict.View attachment 162764

You have not held on to any area. Chumur also you went back. 1962 also you went back. While India has made handsome gains in Sikkim. From 1962 onwards IA has got more in terms of actual results on the ground then PLA.

Also today IA is better entrenched and better suited for mountain war then PLA. IA also enjoys total support from people of Bhutan and Nepal, and great support from inside Tibet.

So overall IA has a lot more chance of winning a border war with China, then PLA has against IA. its based on facts, and not chest thumping (based on 62) or over nationalism.

 

[帅的一匹]

Ammo shortage is the last thing in mind. I think the war will be decided way before we come to the stage where the ammo is finished.

Nepal and Bhutan. I don't think there is any doubt, about support for IA??. They are essentially as good as Indian states.
Tibet again you know India has special forces consisting of Tibetans only. When they operate in Tibet, the support for IA will be good.

How can you count on those lame Tibetan soldiers. I think IA will resort to nuclear weapon if a converntional defeat happens. The problem is China has more destructive Nuclear arsenal than India. I think you shall take it in to consideration.