What's new

2014 is not 1962 - Indian Much Better Prepared for Chinese Challenge

Because India was comprehensively defeated in battle, in both sectors? :P

That's why everyone agrees India lost the 1962 war.
Maybe because the pre-war position, especially in Aksai Chin, had equal numbers of Chinese and Indians occupying that territory. And after the war, all the Indians moved. To Chinese POW camps. :D

That's CCP propaganda, we have defeated another country in 1971 and we have the surrender document signed by the defeated nation, do you have any such document? Paper tiger China didn't win any war with any country. :lol:
 
obviously CCP doesn't know, so how can the world know.. loll
Yes,PLA knows well and spreading the news of heavy casualties to the local people for no war they want and they are peace-loving.
 
That's CCP propaganda, we have defeated another country in 1971 and we have the surrender document signed by the defeated nation, do you have any such document? Paper tiger China didb't win any war with any country. :lol:

Here's India's surrender document. ;)

Dav7g[1].jpg
 
Do you think china is ready to challenge us militarily? :)

The Indian Army certainly thinks so, they said that India can't ever hope to match China. :P

I don't think India is prepared, certainly not to fight China+Pakistan combined, which is likely now given the current regional scenario. Not even to fight China alone.
 
The Indian Army certainly thinks so, they said that India can't ever hope to match China. :P

I don't think India is prepared, certainly not to fight China+Pakistan combined, which is likely now given the current regional scenario. Not even to fight China alone.

China with its $6.8 trillion hole, $25 trillion bank debt, impending economic crisis, mostly old outdated military equipment worth scrap metal (as confirmed by chinese leaders), seperatist movements in Tibet and Xinjiang, etc. is in no position to fight a war even with Tuvalu or Nauru. China is a paper tiger that never won a war. :P
 
China with its $6.8 trillion hole, $25 trillion bank debt, impending economic crisis, mostly old outdated military equipment worth scrap metal (as confirmed by chinese leaders), seperatist movements in Tibet and Xinjiang, etc. is in no position to fight a war even with Tuvalu or Nauru. China is a paper tiger that never won a war. :P

You'd better let this Sureesh Mehta guy know. But judging from your posts, you're obviously much better informed and have more experience in defense matters than he is. I mean, he was only an Admiral in the Indian Navy. :rofl:

India no match for China: Navy chief - Hindustan Times

This is my favorite part:

“Whether in terms of GDP, defence spending or any other economic, social or development parameter, the gap between the two is just too wide to bridge (and getting wider by the day).”

Maybe he's a CCP agent! :omghaha:
 
you do know that AP is with India? that's enough. :D
China's core interests suffer a lot for the government's policies were inconsistent during some periods and one example is that we recognized Sikkim as part of Inida in the middle of 1980s.
 
The truth is the truth, you never gonna change it by telling a lie thousands time
tell it to your chinese mates always lying that india is backstabber while truth is chinese are backstabber..:agree:

Re-read the thread. We've talked about that imaginary Indian victory already. A battle that took place entirely in Indian imaginations and dutifully edited with ever increasing "Chinese casualties" by Indian wikipedia trolls. No photographic evidence, no 3rd party evidence. Nothing but India's word. :rofl:
It is not imaginary. you dont know it because you live in communist country. you are oppressed people by CCP.
i feel sad for all chinese oppressed people. they dont know anything living in dreamland provided by CCP. :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
China's core interests suffer a lot for the government's policies were inconsistent during some periods and one example is that we recognized Sikkim as part of Inida in the middle of 1980s.

Our core interests also suffered.
From out point, Tibet should never have been part of China. It should have been a buffer state.
Secondly 1962 should have ended in a draw for us. We had the capability but we didn't pay attention to border (political failure).

China has Tibet which I think is 100 times more better then what India has in Sikkim.

So bottomline is: stay happy with what you have and stop desiring more lands. Bring Pakistan govt. in line by using your influence, increase trade and commerce and improve people's life to make Asia prosperous. (if you really wish to or maybe you only want confrontation as you may believe though wrongly that you can finally win. I don't know whats China's true intentions).

Anyhow in my opinion the future of Humanity is to look beyond Earth. I find it useless to fight for small pieces of lands on Earth when the whole Universe is up for grabs. I hope by 2070-80 India-China be doing join mission in space to other planets/stars, and not destroy each other for pint sized plots of lands on Earth.
 
Last edited:
Our core interests also suffered.
From out point, Tibet should never have been part of China. It should have been a buffer state.
Secondly 1962 should have ended in a draw for us. We had the capability but we didn't pay attention to border (political failure).

China has Tibet which I think is 100 times more better then what India has in Sikkim.

So bottomline is: stay happy with what you have and stop desiring more lands. Bring Pakistan govt. in line by using your influence, increase trade and commerce and improve people's life to make Asia prosperous. (if you really wish to or maybe you only want confrontation as you may believe though wrongly that you can finally win. I don't know whats China's true intentions).
Indian be happy yourselves for you know Tibet is just garbage except its southeastern part where Indian army were deployed to exclusively in the 1950s and then Nehru's forward policy aimed for more further.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom