What's new

2 Carriers deployed, Global Britain, UK Carrier Strike Group Transit the Suez

.
Due to curvature of Earth, ships cannot detect planes beyond 300 km away. You need AWACs in the air to detect planes up to 1,000 km away.
450 km i have to say mostly naval ships AESA has a range of 450 km, that is enough range to for early warning and scramble the jets from aircraft carrier for interceptions, and you don't know the basic of naval warfare, carrier born AWACS can able to go 500 km to detect the target 1000 km away they haven't enough fuel to do so, carrier born AWACS only can go 200/250 km away from aircraft carrier and can detect 600/650 km away at best
 
.
450 km i have to say mostly naval ships AESA has a range of 450 km, that is enough range to for early warning and scramble the jets from aircraft carrier for interceptions, and you don't know the basic of naval warfare, carrier born AWACS can able to go 500 km to detect the target 1000 km away they haven't enough fuel to do so, carrier born AWACS only can go 200/250 km away from aircraft carrier and can detect 600/650 km away at best

Ships cannot detect sea skimming missiles out to 450 km. Might not even be able to detect low flying planes out to 450 km. That's why carrier borne AWACs are so important. On 001 and 002 there are Ka-31 AWAC helicopters. 003 can carry KJ-600 AWAC planes.
 
. .
Ships cannot detect sea skimming missiles out to 450 km. Might not even be able to detect low flying planes out to 450 km. That's why carrier borne AWACs are so important. On 001 and 002 there are Ka-31 AWAC helicopters. 003 can carry KJ-600 AWAC planes.
And i am talking about high flying jets at 450 km, and can AWACS or early warning helicopter can't able to detect low flying sea skimming cruise missiles and there are multiple sensors like IR based sensors and other supplementary radars that can detect low flying cruise missiles at relatively long ranges
 
.
Now to get a band playing Rule Britannia at full blast while sailing into ports like Singapore and Hong Kong
 
. . .
LOL, and how do you know its a less advance than type 3 Chinese carrier, LOL, RR and BAE has a vast experience in development/designing of propulsion and electronic systems than Chinese companies, and you just starts the designing/development of aircraft carriers, lol think first before you post

QE class is not alone and is accompanied by one of the best destroyers in the world, Type 45 so AWACS is not needed, and EMALS just for launching the aircraft, steam catapult can launch as many aircraft that your Type 003 able to launch but main advantages of EMALS is less stress and wear and tear on launching airframe

if they did they'd have commercially competitive civilian products. but they don't. commercial products don't have political hype. It is either commercially competitive or it isn't.

if they had such great electronics their best semiconductor fab wouldn't be producing 180 nm chips on 200 mm wafers. Meanwhile SMIC produces 14 nm chips on 300 mm wafers. 180 nm on 200 mm wafers is stone age technology compared to 14 nm on 300 mm wafers due to the vast inferiority in essentially every possible metric, and requires 10+ massive technological innovations to catch up.

Huawei has a civilian phased array transceiver that works in an EM environment 100x more complicated than the ocean: a crowded city. if a commercial company like Huawei can produce civilian phased array transmitters, what do you think military phase arrays are like on the 055 that don't have to worry about cost?

Huawei alone has more semiconductor capability than all of the UK. Tell me more about electronics?

Type 045 can't see over the radar horizon and only has 48 VLS.

In comparison the Type 055 has 2x more power generation capability, 2.5x more VLS, 2x more helicopters.
 
.
if they did they'd have commercially competitive civilian products. but they don't. commercial products don't have political hype. It is either commercially competitive or it isn't.

if they had such great electronics their best semiconductor fab wouldn't be producing 180 nm chips on 200 mm wafers. Meanwhile SMIC produces 14 nm chips on 300 mm wafers.

Huawei has a civilian phased array transceiver that works in an EM environment 100x more complicated than the ocean: a crowded city. if a commercial company like Huawei can produce civilian phased array transmitters, what do you think military phase arrays are like on the 055 that don't have to worry about cost?

Type 045 can't see over the radar horizon and only has 48 VLS.

In comparison the Type 055 has 2x more power generation capability, 2.5x more VLS, 2x more helicopters.
Civilian technologies are not comparable to military technologies, Can Huawei phase array transceiver have ability to work in heavy ECM environment???

and Type 55 wont be along with your carrier battle groups, and also have a same radar range of British Type 45 because of curvature of earth (natural cause)

And Type 45 is comparable to your Type 52 series of destroyers
 
. .
It will be launched this year or next year.

pln-type-003-carrier-20210706-1-jpg.759908

What if the Chinese returned the favor and sailed this carrier for a freedom of navigation pass by Britain, with its full battle group. Put a symbolic end to the “century of humiliation”. Not likely to happen, just a thought. Would be crazy sight to behold, especially if it sailed out of Hong Kong at the start of the journey.
 
.
What if the Chinese returned the favor and sailed this carrier for a freedom of navigation pass by Britain, with its full battle group. Put a symbolic end to the “century of humiliation”. Not likely to happen, just a thought. Would be crazy sight to behold, especially if it sailed out of Hong Kong at the start of the journey.

Chinese are not little hearted people like British. Chinese don't do stupid things like that. Chinese win hearts and minds around the world by being kind rather than intimidating others. Hence Chinese not British are much welcomed in the developing world.
 
.
Civilian technologies are not comparable to military technologies, Can Huawei phase array transceiver have ability to work in heavy ECM environment???

and Type 55 wont be along with your carrier battle groups, and also have a same radar range of British Type 45 because of curvature of earth (natural cause)

And Type 45 is comparable to your Type 52 series of destroyers

Civilian phased arrays work in the highest RF noise environment on earth: urban regions with 10+ million transmitters. In the ocean, how many transmitters are there? True, civilian technologies are not directly comparable. However, it demonstrates depth of expertise especially when China has both civilian and military versions (unlike say South Korea or Sweden).

Type 45 is comparable to Type 52D but the difference is Type 52Ds are far more numerous and lower cost thanks to China's larger shipbuilding industry and the improved Type 052DL has 2 helicopters.
 
.
Civilian phased arrays work in the highest RF noise environment on earth: urban regions with 10+ million transmitters. In the ocean, how many transmitters are there? True, civilian technologies are not directly comparable. However, it demonstrates depth of expertise especially when China has both civilian and military versions (unlike say South Korea or Sweden).
So why do you assume that UK has not civilian phase array transceiver technology for London ànd other large cities??
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom