Bangladesh wasn't a product of any revolution but the outcome of skillful maneuvering of creative chaos, meticulous-implementation of layer based conspiracy. In order to avoid fallacy in the premise and understand it, you have to go way before than 71, infect starting from 1905 would be an ideal one IMO. Please find out on why same Malauns have divided Bengal for vote in 1946 that had negated it in 1906 and made BRITS to annul it in 1911. Why did the socio-economic condition of W Bengali jute mill owners, traders relegated after E Bengal joined with Pakistani Federation? Why were many Jute mills burned in BD after it was created and what was the correlation of such incidents with the subsequent rise of W Bengali's jute industry again?
Now coming to the issue of the relevance of OPP. Search Light, I would urge you to read the best of its along with the war documentary as " The way it was" by Brig. Z Alam Khan, where you would find that W Pakistani army couldn't avoid its men and Bihari's slaughter along with being raped without conducting specific of such opp. that was later painted as monstrosity. BTW, no sane one should support innocent's killings and I was no way doing such. And look BRO, military opp. by nature is brute and when it happens in cities, populated areas; it is bound to create some collateral damages but for sure it hadn't been to the proportion/extent of India's one on Kashmiris or Nazi's one on Spanish Guernicas or ISRO's recent one on Gazans. And Sharmila Bose has also vouched the truth of it in her recent books.
BTW, Bangladesh wasn't the only product of cunning, immoral, creative and disproportionate force but also many others like ISRO, new Iraq, Afghan, Libya etc., which proved that righteous didn't necessarily prevail but the smart-powerful one even if he were an evil.
And the myth of deliberate economic disparity between East and Western parts was buried many times by me and others. Please go to 'Bangladeshi Coup' thread to find it out, thanks.
happy?
