Slayer786
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,324
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
u idiot ur 2800 soldiers + full tank regiment + light weight artillery carrier WITH FULL BATTLE PREPARATION wanted to come to THAR n capture it ..
THey were stopped and demolished and kicked back to their field by 120 patrolling troop soldiers with merely 5 light artillery carrier vehicles UN PREPARED FOR BATTLE .
THEY HOLDED UR MASSIVE TANKS N 2800 SOLDIERS FOR 6 HOURS..
soo DUDE WAKEUP ..
120 NE YE HAAL KIYA TO SOCH 13.5 LACKS ACTIVE +21.42 LACKS RESERVED + 13 LACKS PARAMILITARY =4.9 LACKS SOLDIERS KYA HAAL KARENGE TUMHARAA ..
INDIA ALWAYS BEEN A FRIENDLY STATE .. ITS UU THAT CAN'T BEHAVE WELL.
ABHI BHI SHAK HAI ???
AJAAAAAAAAA
Well I was just replying to your statement that no 120 soldiers were there who took part in that battle. There was NO BRAVERY done from any indian mai ka laal, it was only IAF which defeated the Pak army battalion. As without air cover they were sitting ducks, so naturally that was going to happen.
Also, it is funny when you write that India is a friendly state. None of its neighbours really like it, they tolerate it as it is a bully. It has fought wars with two if its neighbours. Send its soldiers to another where they were quite easily ambushed and killed and still were resnted by the govt of that country who started blaming India for arming the rebels.
And FYI, we have tried all that we could to induce a war, its just you pathetic indians who are scared to attack us. We started the Kargil war, and you guys after getting your behind whopped complained to the USA who ordered our bhagora PM to withdraw. After that we did the Indian parliament attack and then after doing a drama of mobilix\zing a million men to attck us, you guys went limp again as usual. Then we did the Mumbai attacks, and really hoped this time you indian would have the b.alls to attack us. But being cowards as you are, that also just petered out with nothing happening.
And we are still waiting..............