What's new

1960 Chinese map depicted Senkakus as Japanese territory

@Korean
welcome back! where were you lately?
 
.
If China played its victimness right, yea sure.

Korea has stockpiled a pile of Japanese maps and foreign ministry documents dated prior to 1905 listing the Liancourt Rocks as Koreans, thanks to the help of Japan's leftwingers and college history professors.

But don't expect those people to help out China.

That's why Japan is still claiming Dokdo island because according to you some Japanese history professors or left wingers are on South Korea's side.
 
.
If China played its victimness right, yea sure.

Korea has stockpiled a pile of Japanese maps and foreign ministry documents dated prior to 1905 listing the Liancourt Rocks as Koreans, thanks to the help of Japan's leftwingers and college history professors.

But don't expect those people to help out China.


Obviously China is not playing the victim card here and why should she. She has all the proofs in the world as far as the Diaoyu is concerned and none of them are important since both will not agree on a third party arbitration. As I said on my post before yours: she's now controlling the islands and is in no hurry to occupy them, time is on her side.
 
.
Obviously China is not playing the victim card here and why should she. She has all the proofs in the world as far as the Diaoyu is concerned and none of them are important since both will not agree on a third party arbitration. As I said on my post before yours: she's now controlling the islands and is in no hurry to occupy them, time is on her side.

If that's the case why not go to the UN to solve the problem why make threats of war on people if china has all the evidence why are you chinese so afraid of ? what no confidence or you think your above everyone else
 
.
If that's the case why not go to the UN to solve the problem why make threats of war on people if china has all the evidence why are you chinese so afraid of ? what no confidence or you think your above everyone else


"Make threat of war"? I didn't know by sending coast guard vessels to protect one's possessions is a threat of war, unless you mean Japan's recently threaten China of sending warships to Diaoyu or your Aquino arrested Chinese fishermen with a warship. Those two actions were indeed acts of war.
 
.
If that's the case why not go to the UN to solve the problem why make threats of war on people if china has all the evidence why are you chinese so afraid of ? what no confidence or you think your above everyone else

Korean doesn't wanna go to the UN to solve their problem with Japan either, are they afraid?
 
.
For us it is not necessary bad at all, to see China and Japan engaging in a dogfight for supremacy in East Asia. As long as a certain neighbor country is distracted, we can carry out some plans :lol:
See?how ambitious these little Vietnam are. Delusional one......

@Korean
welcome back! where were you lately?
Little cheerleader welcome his boss back hah?
 
.
If that's the case why not go to the UN to solve the problem why make threats of war on people if china has all the evidence why are you chinese so afraid of ? what no confidence or you think your above everyone else
Stronger one owns the island, even stupid one knows who control the UN,are you?
 
.
If that's the case why not go to the UN to solve the problem why make threats of war on people if china has all the evidence why are you chinese so afraid of ? what no confidence or you think your above everyone else
we will be back at huang yan Island when the whether turns good. Who said that? I heard this BS almost half a year ago. Now you are forbidden to go there cause your absurd misdeed following dirty American.
 
.
See?how ambitious these little Vietnam are. Delusional one......
Little cheerleader welcome his boss back hah?

I believe korean was banned bz he used improper language. Was a joke. You are thinking too crazy. Anyway Vietnam and Korea are friends.
 
.
India have take side, because if Big IF China can take Japan then all Asian will fall to China that's include India, China are thr aggressor always always will be, have you heard "One For All, All For One"


India always maintained that the disputes of SCS and east sea should be solved peacefully and according to international maritime laws.

According to that position of India spratleys and parcel islands should belong to Vietnam and Phillipines respectively.

Chinese always think of some facts which are rosy in the past and forget the glorious past of others. If China can assert the claim on Senkaku with some maps of Japan at the end of 19th century why not Japan.

Fact is China is claiming those Islands from 1970 onwards and after UN found oil reserves there, But the recent evidences shown by Japan nails that Chinese are laying claims based on twisted facts.

If China wants to bully its neighbors and wants to settle the disputes on its own terms first it has to get out the UNCLOS agreement and show to the world how much respect it has for International laws.

But again doing it, will make it a bully and an aggressor.

Regarding bullying of China in Asia we might see some military alliances in future, so no worry :agree:

I believe korean was banned bz he used improper language. Was a joke. You are thinking too crazy. Anyway Vietnam and Korea are friends.

Some Mods here are biased and particularly Chinese one :P
 
.
Little cheerleader welcome his boss back hah?
korean was back and now banned again!


OK, since you refuse to understand the chain of events that lead up to the annexation of Taiwan and the Okinawa islands so lets talk about the ground reality here. Now China is patrolling Diaoyu islands as her own properties and what your buddy, Japan, is going to do about them? There's no way Japan can administer the islands alone as it was the case before, with or without the US helps. China has all the time in the world and the longer she waits the better. :tup:


Japan has tasted the "soft and peaceful" power of China lately.
Worse for them is the pain is not going to ease soon. My guess is Japan is leaving the islands as they are today: uninhabited and hideout for birds and other animals.
 
.
Japan has tasted the "soft and peaceful" power of China lately.
Worse for them is the pain is not going to ease soon. My guess is Japan is leaving the islands as they are today: uninhabited and hideout for birds and other animals.


That would be a good move by Japan but realistically she loses the islands for good although China's not going to get them anytime soon. As I said earlier China probably doesn't want the possessions now because her relationship with Taiwan is more important than those rocks.

For Japan the problems are election time politics (which can be as dirty as hell) and her right wingers. She needs to put a gag order in this and let time heals the disharmonious feelings between the two people. She also need to tell the Americans to buzz off because their intentions are not benign and the least they want to see is a buddy buddy China and Japan.

Japan's economy, give its stagnation with the American market for the past three decades, needs the Chinese consumer market to survive, period because her economical base is much higher than all Asian country.

Here is a link to have an understanding on how powerful money is: Asia Times Online :: China's economic power mightier than the sword We all now how important money is on the street level but it's far more important in the national levels.
 
.
OK, since you refuse to understand the chain of events that lead up to the annexation of Taiwan and the Okinawa islands so lets talk about the ground reality here. Now China is patrolling Diaoyu islands as her own properties and what your buddy, Japan, is going to do about them? There's no way Japan can administer the islands alone as it was the case before, with or without the US helps. China has all the time in the world and the longer she waits the better. :tup:
Chain of events? Why not go back 1000 year then China can claim both Korea and Japan that's the Gold Pots.
With the internal problems China having, I would said time belong to Japan.
 
.
Chain of events? Why not go back 1000 year then China can claim both Korea and Japan that's the Gold Pots.
With the internal problems China having, I would said time belong to Japan.

Japan never belongs to China nor bow down to any Chinese dynasties, unlike Korea.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom