And then again you contradicting the same in last paragraph.
You do realize that no country except the citi states like Singapore can afford such model, heck even the UK which is only about half of the size of Balochistan and with multitude of fiscal resources at her disposal can't ensure a justified distribution of resources and wealth. Furthermore, Services sector dominate UK's economy with Financial servicing generating about 80% of the current employment. Btw I would love to be corrected and thankful if you can kindly share some graphical distribution of the industries in UK. The income distribution and Venture capital markets map show exact otherwise
There's only little problem here, doing so would be just like ignoring the whole tree and focusing on seeds instead.
If I start replying to your post it will be too length and I might need 20,000 words assignment to explain everything. The bottom line is,
UK enjoy a special status of World City. It's financial centre is unique. One example is, Company A based in New York and Company B based in Tokyo wish to collaborate for a new project so they will establish headquarter in London and hire accountants from London to take care of their financial affairs. London enjoys special status besides being part of UK.
When you go to study business education, they give you basic knowledge that for example there is a fixed salary of telephone operator worth £18,000. This is going to remain same whether you work in London or Glasgow. Then you add the cost of renting a property in London, which is for example 2200 per month x 12 = £26,400 and add the cost of transportation for London around £3500. So the total salary will be £18000 + 26,400 + £3500 = £47,900. This is a rough example because too many factors comes in.
The same job in Glasgow will be worked out something like £18000 + £500 per month = £6000 and £1000 for transportation so the employer may get only £25,000 but it is technically the same amount if you had worked in London when you take the cost of higher expenses in London. So when you see different pay scale, it doesn't have to be London is getting any advantage.
London used to have industries everywhere but most of the industries have been relocated to other cities due to rise of population. When you see the GDP of London, it is basically because of the "Passport" status of London and business friendly policies. You must also not forget that UK has a population of 64 million people out of which about 14 million only lives in the suburbs of London. That is about 22% of UK population... so they get fair distribution of resources in proportion to the size of the population.
The map that you showed already shows fair distribution of resources so I don't have to work too much on that. What they are showing is the income. You do not know that the place where the average income is £18,000 per annum. The average house prices are £300 per month compared to £2000 per month in London.
If you Google the best places to live in UK, you are more likely to find those low pay areas compared to London due to the overly expensive rising costs in London. London will top the rank when you start seeing most expensive cities of UK
I think this discussion has nothing to do with Gwadar. All I am saying is, we must focus on building infrastructure in Balochistan and not blindly invest in 1 city having a non-existant population in hope for the neighbouring cities to relocate in order to fill the vacant job roles.
We basically need similar health infrastructure in Zhob compared to any city in Punjab, Sindh or K-P. The basic facilities must be similar for the residents of every city.
In UK, wherever you go, you will find a hospital and school within walking distance. Wherever you go you will find parks, industrial zones, places of activity etc