1 million South Koreans hold a massive protest against gay marriage and LGBT ideology.

In a significant demonstration of opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, approximately 1 million South Koreansparticipated in a massive protest against gay marriage and what they term "LGBT ideology." This event reflects the ongoing tensions surrounding LGBTQ+ issues in South Korea, where societal attitudes and legal protections remain contentious.

Key Points:​

• Public Sentiment: The protest highlights the strong conservative sentiment in South Korea regarding LGBTQ+ rights. Despite some progress in public opinion towards acceptance, a substantial portion of the population continues to oppose same-sex marriage and LGBTQ+ rights, often citing religious beliefs and traditional values.
• Legal Context: Currently, South Korea does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions, and there are no comprehensive anti-discrimination laws protecting individuals based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This legal landscape contributes to the challenges faced by the LGBTQ+ community in advocating for their rights.
• Political Climate: The protests are indicative of the influence of conservative groups and religious organizations in South Korean politics. These groups have historically opposed any legislative efforts aimed at recognizing LGBTQ+ rights, often mobilizing large demonstrations to voice their dissent.
• Comparison with Public Support: While recent polls indicate a growing acceptance of LGBTQ+ rights among younger generations, with around 38% supporting same-sex marriage according to a 2021 Gallup Korea poll, the protests demonstrate that significant opposition remains entrenched within society.
• Impact on Legislation: The strong opposition from conservative factions has resulted in repeated failures to pass anti-discrimination bills that would protect LGBTQ+ individuals. Efforts to introduce comprehensive legislation have been met with fierce resistance, highlighting the deep divisions within South Korean society regarding these issues.

Conclusion​

The massive protest against gay marriage and LGBTQ+ ideology in South Korea underscores the ongoing struggle between progressive movements advocating for equality and conservative forces resisting change. As public opinion continues to evolve, the future of LGBTQ+ rights in South Korea will likely depend on ongoing advocacy efforts and the ability to navigate the complex political landscape influenced by cultural and religious beliefs.

 

[HaiderAfan]

In a significant demonstration of opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, approximately 1 million South Koreansparticipated in a massive protest against gay marriage and what they term "LGBT ideology." This event reflects the ongoing tensions surrounding LGBTQ+ issues in South Korea, where societal attitudes and legal protections remain contentious.

Key Points:​

• Public Sentiment: The protest highlights the strong conservative sentiment in South Korea regarding LGBTQ+ rights. Despite some progress in public opinion towards acceptance, a substantial portion of the population continues to oppose same-sex marriage and LGBTQ+ rights, often citing religious beliefs and traditional values.
• Legal Context: Currently, South Korea does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions, and there are no comprehensive anti-discrimination laws protecting individuals based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This legal landscape contributes to the challenges faced by the LGBTQ+ community in advocating for their rights.
• Political Climate: The protests are indicative of the influence of conservative groups and religious organizations in South Korean politics. These groups have historically opposed any legislative efforts aimed at recognizing LGBTQ+ rights, often mobilizing large demonstrations to voice their dissent.
• Comparison with Public Support: While recent polls indicate a growing acceptance of LGBTQ+ rights among younger generations, with around 38% supporting same-sex marriage according to a 2021 Gallup Korea poll, the protests demonstrate that significant opposition remains entrenched within society.
• Impact on Legislation: The strong opposition from conservative factions has resulted in repeated failures to pass anti-discrimination bills that would protect LGBTQ+ individuals. Efforts to introduce comprehensive legislation have been met with fierce resistance, highlighting the deep divisions within South Korean society regarding these issues.

Conclusion​

The massive protest against gay marriage and LGBTQ+ ideology in South Korea underscores the ongoing struggle between progressive movements advocating for equality and conservative forces resisting change. As public opinion continues to evolve, the future of LGBTQ+ rights in South Korea will likely depend on ongoing advocacy efforts and the ability to navigate the complex political landscape influenced by cultural and religious beliefs.

View attachment 1033700View attachment 1033701

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851902904044577105

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Normalized homosexuality in most Asian, Middle Easterner, and African culture is unacceptable. Greco-Roman western civilization had normalized homosexuality, and it is wrong to impose that on others. Westerners assume homosexuality is only Biblical prohibition. In my ancestry we never drank alcohol, Arabs and others assume it is only because of Quran.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Normalized homosexuality in most Asian, Middle Easterner, and African culture is unacceptable. Greco-Roman western civilization had normalized homosexuality, and it is wrong to impose that on others. Westerners assume homosexuality is only Biblical prohibition. In my ancestry we never drank alcohol, Arabs and others assume it is only because of Quran.

The Tokyo High Court has ruled that Japan's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, marking a significant victory for LGBTQ+ rights in the country. This decision, delivered on October 30, 2024, condemns the prohibition as “groundless legal discrimination” and asserts that it violates constitutional guarantees of equality and individual dignity.
Key Points:

Legal Ruling: The court's ruling aligns with a previous decision from the Sapporo High Court earlier in March 2024, which also found the ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. This series of rulings is seen as a momentum shift towards marriage equality in Japan.
Public Support: Recent polls indicate a growing public acceptance of same-sex marriage in Japan, with approximately 63% of respondents supporting the legalization of same-sex unions. This support is particularly strong among younger generations, reflecting changing societal attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights.
Political Landscape: Despite these judicial advances, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) remains cautious about fully embracing same-sex marriage legislation. Currently, same-sex couples in Japan have limited legal recognition and benefits through “partnership certificates,” but they do not enjoy the full rights associated with marriage.
Advocacy for Reform: LGBTQ+ advocates view this ruling as a crucial step toward comprehensive legal reform. They continue to push for changes that would align Japan’s laws with global standards regarding equality and human rights.

Conclusion
The Tokyo High Court's ruling against the ban on same-sex marriage represents a landmark moment for LGBTQ+ rights in Japan. As public sentiment shifts and legal barriers are challenged, advocates hope this decision will pave the way for more inclusive policies and practices in the future. The ongoing dialogue around marriage equality reflects broader societal changes and highlights the importance of continued advocacy for civil rights in Japan.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

The Tokyo High Court has ruled that Japan's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, marking a significant victory for LGBTQ+ rights in the country. This decision, delivered on October 30, 2024, condemns the prohibition as “groundless legal discrimination” and asserts that it violates constitutional guarantees of equality and individual dignity.
Key Points:

Legal Ruling: The court's ruling aligns with a previous decision from the Sapporo High Court earlier in March 2024, which also found the ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. This series of rulings is seen as a momentum shift towards marriage equality in Japan.
Public Support: Recent polls indicate a growing public acceptance of same-sex marriage in Japan, with approximately 63% of respondents supporting the legalization of same-sex unions. This support is particularly strong among younger generations, reflecting changing societal attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights.
Political Landscape: Despite these judicial advances, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) remains cautious about fully embracing same-sex marriage legislation. Currently, same-sex couples in Japan have limited legal recognition and benefits through “partnership certificates,” but they do not enjoy the full rights associated with marriage.
Advocacy for Reform: LGBTQ+ advocates view this ruling as a crucial step toward comprehensive legal reform. They continue to push for changes that would align Japan’s laws with global standards regarding equality and human rights.

Conclusion
The Tokyo High Court's ruling against the ban on same-sex marriage represents a landmark moment for LGBTQ+ rights in Japan. As public sentiment shifts and legal barriers are challenged, advocates hope this decision will pave the way for more inclusive policies and practices in the future. The ongoing dialogue around marriage equality reflects broader societal changes and highlights the importance of continued advocacy for civil rights in Japan.

View attachment 1033751View attachment 1033752

Disgusting. I suspected Japan normalized homosexuality in the ancient past like Greco Romans and it did.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Nothing natural about it. It is normalization of evil. Researchers found only one primitive culture with forced homosexuality as part of adult initiation ritual of boys.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

President Putin on LGBTQ in Russia:

"Adults can live as they want, just don't touch the kids.

 

[sidkhan2]

Donald Trump says God created only two genders, male and female.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1853262457319416296

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

I used to buy a cookie brand until they had a special promo on their packaging with rainbow colors and love love love written all over. That love isn't meant for me, other minorities, for Palestinians or for general human rights and dignity. Its about worshiping a perverted sexuality and people, like an idol.

 

[sidkhan2]

After Donald Trump's election victory, many LGBTQ+ crisis hotlines experienced a noticeable increase in calls, reflecting heightened concerns among LGBTQ+ individuals. Many callers cited fears over potential changes to policies affecting their rights, personal safety, and societal acceptance. The spike in calls often accompanies shifts in political landscapes that can impact marginalized communities, as individuals seek support and reassurance amid perceived or actual policy threats.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1854408137882665263

 

[Akbar26]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1854404871186788689

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

They are not marginalized. Many are wealthy and politically powerful. Calling them marginalized takes away from the actual marginalized due to race, nationality, politics, religion, family, or economic factors.

They are indoctrinating children with flags, books, songs, dance, perverted stories, and drag queens using public money, want gender confusion and gender terrorism with men using female bathrooms.

 

[sidkhan2]

China …

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Russia's lower house of Parliament, the State Duma, has passed a controversial law banning "child-free propaganda," which is defined as any promotion of a lifestyle that encourages people to avoid having children. This legislation aims to counteract the country's declining birth rates and reflects the Kremlin's broader push to uphold traditional family values against what it perceives as Western liberal ideologies.

Key Details of the Legislation​

• Unanimous Approval: The bill was passed unanimously by the State Duma on November 12, 2024, and it will now proceed to the upper house for review before being sent to President Vladimir Putin for final approval.
• Scope of the Ban: The law prohibits the dissemination of materials—such as films, advertisements, and online content—that promote a rejection of childbearing. Individuals found violating this ban could face fines up to 400,000 rubles (approximately $4,000), while organizations could incur penalties up to 5 million rubles (around $51,000). There are also provisions for deporting foreign nationals who promote child-free lifestyles in Russia.
• Government Rationale: Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin emphasized that "without children, there will be no country," framing the legislation as a necessary measure to protect future generations from ideologies that discourage childbirth. He stated that this law is crucial for fostering traditional family values among young people.
• Context of Demographic Concerns: Russia is facing significant demographic challenges, including an aging population and low birth rates exacerbated by factors such as the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and economic difficulties. The government has been increasingly vocal about its concerns over population decline, which it views as a threat to national security and economic stability.
• Criticism and Concerns: Critics argue that the law does not address the underlying issues contributing to low birth rates and may lead to broader restrictions on personal freedoms. Legal experts have raised concerns about the vague language in the bill, which could result in unintended consequences regarding discussions on reproductive health and education.

This legislative move is part of a larger trend in Russia towards promoting conservative values and restricting content deemed contrary to these ideals, including previous bans on LGBTQ+ propaganda and discussions surrounding gender transition.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1857106220844503275

 

[HaiderAfan]

Russian President Vladimir Putin has made provocative statements regarding LGBTQ+ rights, claiming that the West promotes "open satanism" through its acceptance of gay and transgender rights. Speaking at a cultural forum in St. Petersburg, Putin expressed his belief that the promotion of LGBTQ+ rights is part of a broader ideological battle against traditional values, which he argues are being undermined by Western influences.

Key Points from Putin's Remarks:​

• Cultural Critique: Putin criticized Western countries for showcasing LGBTQ+ lifestyles in cultural competitions, suggesting that this approach imposes a foreign ideology on society. He stated that while the LGBTQ+ community is part of society, their representation should not dominate cultural narratives.
• Legislative Actions: Concurrently, the Russian government has intensified its crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights. The Justice Ministry has filed a lawsuit to classify the "international LGBT movement" as extremist, which could lead to severe restrictions on LGBTQ+ activism in Russia. This follows the expansion of anti-LGBTQ+ laws that criminalize the promotion of non-heterosexual relationships and impose heavy fines for violations.
• Broader Implications: These statements and legislative measures reflect a significant shift towards ultra-conservative policies in Russia, where the government seeks to promote traditional family values while suppressing what it deems "destructive ideologies" from the West. This aligns with Putin's broader political strategy to consolidate power by appealing to nationalist sentiments among his base.

Putin's rhetoric and the accompanying legal actions highlight the ongoing repression faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in Russia, as well as the government's efforts to frame its policies as a defense against Western moral decay.