Search results

Nope. No duplicate, just original. Btw,the other guy mentioned isn’t too shabby either though what “old hats” he tries on you I can’t quite fathom....:rolleyes: Not 1st day of the new year , must be some quite old year considering the epithets flying about.....:D

80% Hindu, so 20%(almost?) Muslim? Sikhs, Christians , Buddhists, Jains etc can go take a walk...?

Nope. We play Pakistan where it suits us. What’s difficult to understand. Not appealable. No jurisdiction. Not enforceable. Pakistan originally supported the Big 3 plan and later voted against it. Big 3 doesn’t exist. Even if this was an agreement and not just a worthless MoU, it still would...

A couple guys (one sadly dead now) at the end of their careers and Neha Dhupia?:lol: As I said no stars...never said no unemployed actors. Even if the two gentlemen referred to were phenomenal talents. Om Puri took a lot of unnecessary flak at the very end of life for some loose talking about...

Well...if it makes you feel better, sure..she’s a 20 years old ‘budding actress” star....or star...ish....:D Maybe but as I said, they are not likely to be found hanging around in Pakistan. Professional death sentence for a “star”.....

Typical or not, it’s the truth. Pakistan is not a place to be for an Indian “star”.

South Indian star? Must be a phenomenally low bar that.....if she was a star, she wouldn’t be in Pakistan....

:woot: :lol:

A Pakistani in these times talking about aid and using :rofl: is what qualifies as really strange.

No British aid is taken by the government of India. The aid is to NGO’s in India. The British are free to stop that anytime they wish.

There were three judges sitting on the bench that acquitted her. It is not like the CJP alone ruled on the matter.

How is a Science and Technology minister directly responsible for transfer of a police officer? Clearly not his remit and as the article says, it was done by the PM. Doesn’t matter who complained, the person responsible for any such transfer was the person possessing the authority to give such...

She should be allowed to leave Pakistan tonight, would save everyone a lot of trouble. As far as passing the buck goes, even the High court did it, seems like this is too difficult a subject to deal with.

I don't know specifically about Pakistan (i assume it will be similar to India) but review petitions in Supreme Court decisions are limited only to legal infirmities and minor modifications, they are not going to retry the case or reverse their decision.

In the review plea filed in the apex court's Lahore registry on Thursday, the petitioners urged the court to have Asia Bibi put on the Exit Control List (ECL) and barred from leaving the country until a decision on the petition. The petitioners argued that Bibi confessed to her crimes during...

Juvenile. He was never charged with indulging in violence, the worst charge was that he did not clamp down hard enough early. The Supreme Court found no evidence for the charge. Anyways, this is off topic. This thread is not about India.

i have no idea what you mean. If I said that I find the idea of violence unlawful, it follows that anyone indulging in violence needs to be dealt with strictly by law.

That may well be the case, though I would be surprised if it was so in a criminal case since the state is the prosecuting authority. However, the post of mine was made in the context of the government supposedly filing a review petition and putting her on an ECL. The logic of my post stands.

Even if they were eating beef, the law & I would regard violence done to them as unlawful.

I was under the impression that the discussion was about the government filing the review petition.