Search results

Not the son, a junior party in the same government as the KMT, the CPC did not evolve from the KMT but was rather a partner to it. Jiao zhi is just the general name of the area. moreover jiao zhi is literally several periods/governments/eras away from modern vietnam, you are cherry picking a...

not actually possible for the us to not comply. in the event a consulate that was order to leave, doesn't. the very first step is to revoke their diplomat status, which any host nation can do. then after that they are just illegal aliens subject to any and all local laws.

if i had a dollar for every-time an india or western "expert" claims the three gorges dam is collapsing, I'd have enough money to buy 1 years supply of munitions for the indian army instead of their 10 day supply now. If i had a dollar for every-time these same monkeys claims china itself is...

well yes. the CPC was actually the junior/main opposition party in the republic of china, until the KMT decided to commit massacres that forced the CPC out. literally no one denies this. also curious, you say "Beijing’s claim is illegal", what do you think of vietnam's claims which are roughly...

good lord, you indians just can't stop lying can you? its already proven that the 100 dead figure is just another lie, and even if Jianli Yang really said that, how would a criminal whos been outside of china for 31 years know anything about chinese casualty figures? you gonna take my word that...

sure you do, yet you keep asking a question that i've answer twice now. so for the third time who cares? "people who care about facts, that said, i was merely setting the record straight, you don't have to care about it at all."

first of all, "combining their success rates to telling they are better" i combined them to make india look better, most single variants of rockets used for a good amount of time have 99%+ and oh you want laughs? you want a single specific vehicle? you want similar number of launches? long...

that's stuff that would be far off in the future, there is a plan(or rather, an idea) similar to the american one, of bringing a small meteor to earth or moon orbit to better study it on security grounds. it's not even about tech, since even a bolt from the us isn't suppose to be on a...

lololol you act like your "belief" is whats required. who the heck are you anyways? god himself? and again since you clearly have a reading disability, ill quote myself

IF someone will loan you a 3 billion dollars soft loan paid over 30 years then sure, but such a loan can only come from another government but no one in their right mind is gonna loan you 3 billion for ddgs, ships what would effectively be white elephants, military ships do not generate a...

70% success rate is absolutely horrendous when it comes to launch vehicle reliability take a look at others Delta - 95% success rate long march series - 95.5% space x - 94% Ariane 5 - 95.7% proton(which has had issues recently due to quality control) - 88.6%

chinese commercial space launch services was popular(even among american companies) before the us banned any american components from flying on them, at the time most satellites used some american part in one way or another so the banned cause a large fall in business, however even during that...

it does not cause environmental damage, ships and other things are cleaned, oil and other polluting parts are are removed before they sink it, essentially only the metal is sunk, and it's actually very good for fish as a shelter and something for corral to grown on.

sejong is among the cheapest aegis ships ever, that said, i won't go argue with you about the price, my original point still stands, at 750 million to 1 billion a ship, you're gonna get 3, then have no fund at all for army, airforce or anything else.

perhaps eventually according to your own post, no it wont lm-5 gto capacity is 14 tonnes, making it second only to the delta IV heavy as the heaviest in-service launch rocket avalible

yea. not a chance the 052D is only 500 million, and not a chance the 055 is 750 million, china has lower costs than the US but not THAT much lower especially considering the cutting edge tech used in these ships. you wanna make it costly for a enemy? subs, missile, basically anti-access...

while it's always wise to check the numbers, the article you posted actually speaks rather favorably of the projects, as it states that the expects increase in revenue from the projects(ie: increase trade, more business investments, lowered cost of transport, other benefits) more than makes up...

ah but here's the thing, does a very expensive DDG help with "freedom"? to go into more detail, who exactly threatens your "freedom" and would the amount of DDG's you can buy prevent them from taking your freedom if they choose to. moreover, what are you giving up to buy the DDGs since money...

even if that were true and india places an order for 50 jets tomorrow, there are several issues. for example tech transfers, there are certain techs us is just not going to give india, things like radar, they aren't even giving it to the likes of japan, south korea and even britain. and tech...

there's a major difference though. in 1894, the beiyang fleet had major ammunition issues, the central government at the time was well on its way to terminal decline and while the japanese had faster firing guns, the chinese ships weren't actually that bad and was of european origin but bad...