Search results

That was then, but now what could UK offer China from its military industries apart from those thing they could not sell even with no weapon ban.

Of course they are against the lifting of the ban, because lifting the ban will only benefit France, Germany and Italy, but none of Britain's military manufacturers.

So if I buy a piece of land in California or Tokyo, the land is not under US or Japan's administrantion anymore until they nationalize it?

Get your facts straight it has been under Japan's adminstration for 41 years already. Maybe you need to revisit of what nationalization means.

Those editors at TOI seriously really need to get a life other than linking anything China does to its intention to do with India or vice versa.

Why would Korean bring this to UN, as it has the actual control of the island. It is always those who do not have the control or can not hold their claimed dispute territories effectively whining like baby to the UN, and yes in this case China is the crying baby.

That is because according to US Japan security treaty they do have to defend Japan if Japan is attacked by outside force, and under the 1971 Okinawa Treaty US placed Diaoyu Island under Japan's control. The thing is now US is admitting this is a dispute and as long as no one is attacking anyone...

Better deal maybe not, be status quo most likely. Diaoyu Island can never be solved by just China and Japan alone, US needs to be the arbitrator in this dispite as it is the originator of it, but right now it want to prolong this dispute by saying that it does not take any sides in this.

The reason i don't argue with you properly is because your post is too idiotic and stupid to start with that even some Indian member don't agree with you.

You would never guess what my point was in those argument, and my discussions with those indian members were never arguments to start with. Go ask some Indian members before you embarass yourself here. Korean and timetravel seem to have a pretty good grip at how the future will pan put, so...

I have discussed those issues with many Indian members with a reasonable and knowledgable mind like Joe Shearer before. Go look for yourself.

Sometimes I feel you and Sinochallenge are twins somehow.

Go find any of my posts that says I disagree with setting the border with LoAC. Maybe Joe Shear could finally teach something into your thick skull.

You have already proven your ability for reasoning and logic in many threads including this one, you want to go for the bonus points now? If you want to know what kind of poster I am here, just ask around from other Indian members.

If we want this century to belong to Asia, peaceful environment, unity and corporation is more needed than ever now. That includes the animosity between Pakistan and India, Japan and China. The only reason the west is able to poke their nose and meddling in Asian countries affair for their own...

Case in point, you don't even have the slightest idea of when others are talking about.

Aren't this getting old already? Don't you have any braincell left for you to form any reasonable arguement?

While no one can predict the future for its detail. However I am sure 50 years ago any people with reasonable foresight would agree that in the future India and China would be an important player in the world stage. For me I always have known the role India will play even before its economy...

They could not even predict what will happen next year correctly, let alone decades. If they are good at predicting the future, they would be better off working as a fortune teller than getting meaner pay as newspaper writer.

Yet some known troll is predicting something in 2050 for people to troll about.