Search results

Thanks for enlightening me. Lower castes aren't discriminated against. India is heaven, spiritual and may be even worldly. Hinduism promoted science and tech, making India one of the highest literate countries. There are no social/moral ills in India. Anything else that I missed out on?

Leeching money is different from raping or drugging or so on. They were strong, India was weak. They took the money. That is how the world works. Indians were too busy correcting their spiritual life that foreigners did as please. Not like it did any good. Regardless, morality has ambiguous...

I thought we were talking about throughout the centuries. Where the religion hampered the growth of science. Made the country militarily weak, socially ill. Till now we can see the effects. Now if you can justify how more than half the country being 'Dalit' is the sign of spiritual progression...

What makes you think these things grant you happiness?

I care about people being happy in this world. They can do something about otherworld after that.

I could care less about beyond 2 waqt ki roti. This kind of things suit those who have their stomach full. It is pointless to have muscles which would be slave to else's will.

Who is living a prosperous life? Who struggles for '2 waqt ki roti'? Smart people make sure their country develops. Fools talk about liberty, equality and equity without having muscles to ensure that.

They did it because they are smart. India is poor because Indians were fool.

There are temples of Gandhi, Sachin, Amitabh, the motorcycle brand bullet, the villain in Hindu mythology Ravan and so on. Indians are emotional people!

From what I know, yes. I was wrong, it seems fishing is included: Turbot War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am not sure about that part, I know it gives right to resources like oil. But Not sure about fishing.

The resources under sea bed belong to them. It is their economically. Otherwise it is International waters.

4 out of 7 matches India batted second.

Actually, if you notice, good bowling has been rewarded on these pitches. Indians didn't allowed a 300 against them. Spells like that of Starc and Wahab, the NZ bowlers and so on. Its not the pitches, the bowling has been lacking.

So, a lawyer lied. What an unseen, unheard, never before, first of its kind, world shattering phenomenon!

I guess she is trying to convey the prosecutor lied about many things in and off the court. That changed the outcome. Them straws...

Why does it matters how much lies the prosecutor propagated? It's not that the court would decide the ruling based on his comments. How did the biriani claim affected the proceedings bar changing some public perception about speed of court proceedings? It doesn't matter how much he lies about...