Search results

Let's rather rephrase this. PA attacks into Indian territory, assuming, "Hey, our soldiers look like Mujahideen, IAF won't get involved". When IAF does get involved, "Hey, PAF isn't ready, how about we cut off the supply line to our troops, and dismiss them as mujahideen, so that we don't have...

They won't believe that. They think that we spend our whole schooling life bloating our egos. They refuse to accept it even if I post the online version of our textbooks. :rofl:

:lol: Real logic doesn't work that way. When deciding a victor, you don't say, "this guy was inherently smaller, let's give him 10 bonus points for that". Pakistan started a war with an army 3 times its size, it had to face the consequences.

Siachen had 300 Indian soldiers, and a roughly equal number of Pakistani soldiers. Kargil had somewhere between 1000 and 10,000 NLI troops (with tons of support from the local ISI sponsored Mujahideen), and 30,000 Indian troops. Supposedly Pakistan had even moved its nukes to the borders...

This "superior AF" fights only when USA gives it full support with equipment and supplies. When the supplies go, the AF disappears too.

IAF lost 60-70 aircraft, of which 35 were lost to anti-aircraft fire. PAF lost anywhere between 3 (Yup, I've seen Pakistani Youtubers say that only 3 were lost, :rofl:, to upto 90 as claimed by you). He had said "1971 anyone" not about the endless AF vs AF discussion, but because of ajtr's...

They never did care about the people. The people are just an excuse, they just want to create troubles for India. If they did care about Kashmir and Kashmiris, then why would they train the militants? Why would they fight wars, using tribal irregular forces (who don't really care about moral...

Why should we show it as disputed? Pakistan calls it disputed, and so shows it as disputed in textbooks. We call it all Indian, and that's how we show it in our textbooks. Doesn't really matter what the U.N. thinks it is, we print our textbooks. That's not propaganda.

"Freedom fighters", lol. Fighting for what freedom? Freedom to murder innocents. :lol:

OOps, misunderstood you. :D I'll delete that comment. :undecided:

Deleted. :undecided:

I know you didn't. You called my line of reasoning stupid. And I responded telling you that it isn't stupid. I never said that the racist slur is not a racist slur. I even stated that it is supposedly banned by the GoI.

*Facepalm* I never said it's not racist. If someone finds it offensive to be called something then yeah it is racist. All I ever said was that the majority of Indians aren't even aware of the fact that Chinese get offended by it. Again I repeat, I know it is racist and never refer to any...

I'm not making an excuse for the fools on ToI comments who call Chinese "Ch*nk B***ards". I'm just telling you that many of us don't even know that it is racist to call you guys Ch*nk (not the B***ard part of the slur. We all know that's abusive) And since we are on the topic of silliness...

:lol: You're one to comment on my stupidity. If you really don't have anything sensible to contribute, then please don't even try. Ch*nk really fits as a shorter version for Chinese. Nigg*r doesn't fit as short for African or black, or Jamaican, or anything else you can think of, and was a...

Well, yeah it techically should mean black. Not in a racist way, just to refer to anyone black. But with all that slavery, and whites considering everyone but themselves as barbarians (back in the 18th Century), this term has become derogatory.

Sooooo, anyone who calls Englishmen a Brit, is a racist. Calling Americans Yanks is racist. Calling a Saudi Arabian an Arab is racist. Did I justify calling a black a nigg*r? That's a term, short for Negro, which was originally coined with a derogatory meaning, which is well known even by...

But the comments on an online newspaper don't really represent an entire country's understanding of the word right? I wasn't even aware of the racist meaning of this word until I began coming on forums. As for the "Diplomatic Delegation", I really have nothing to say. :| Just FYI, I'm...

For one, that word is banned by GoI I think. And two, many Indians may call Chinese Ch*nks, but what many guys don't realise is, that people like me, and many others, just use it as a short version of the word Chinese. Just like how we call Malayalees-Mallus, and Engishmen-Brits, and so on...

I'm assuming this is a typo, and you mean successor?