Search results

6. Omits that India is the one denying Kashmir self determination, not Pakistan I don't think 3. was exposed later as it always was known to be garbage from the beginning except to the extremely dumb. ---------- Post added at 05:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:29 PM ----------...

India doesn't deserve strategic depth in Afghanistan since it cannot offer it. Pakistan offers Afghanistan strategic depth and Afghanistan offers Pakistan strategic depth. What does India offer aside from instability?

There is so much Bollywood druggery on this thread.

Pakistan isn't the most hated nation in Afghanistan. It's only your (bit biased) impression that is being spoonfed to you by the media and online Tajik brigade.

this isnt news anymore. Afghans (Pashtuns) aren't controlled by anyone. Not even in Pakistan's tribal areas. Pakistan isn't controlling anyone.

That, I'm sure was his point, Mr Nobel Laureate. When the Muslim world was at the forefront of the global economy, it was Muslims that were advancing the world for the benefit of the global village. When that shifted, it was the West. Using the petty Nationalist point scoring system...

India is an enemy of Pakistan I would say because India does have nefarious ambition in Pakistan. Anyone with any knowledge knows this. But the threat from India is very overrated.

wasn't the map invented 1,000 years ago?

The Nobel Prize isn't a big problem. Wealthier countries would of course have more Nobel Laureates because of better education facilities. The main problem is poverty, which gives people nothing to do, which causes them to riot for a period followed by becoming religious fanatics. When...

That's because you were doing so badly abroad ;)

2020 is a long time away. The world is unpredictable.

I didn't point out Pakistanis live in poverty in the UK. That was you or someone else. Figures don't tell much. I just pointed out that if they're doing super duper then having them return won't be best (some of you seemed to believe diamonds were coming out your anuses and you were...

I agree the returning Indians can get jobs in India but the Indians in India will become unemployed. There's investment from India into the UK and with that will come people transfer. Though more controllable probably.

this is typically Bollywood denial mode, isn't it. Point finger at Pakistan when you make a point about India. If it makes you FEEL BETTER :cheers:

you must have missed my sarcasm. ---------- Post added at 05:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:57 PM ---------- Then Indians stand to lose the most then. In any case, poverty rates are of no relevance and probably not very accurate.

Soviet Communism - 2 cows. You and your neighbour look after them. The government takes the milk. You steal back all the milk and sell it on the Black Market. That's not Communism. Pure Communism is a stateless society with no government. Everyone is self sufficient. There's a wiki...

The Indian diaspora can get jobs in India no problem but they will make other Indians redundant in the process. All in all I don't think there's much to object to here unless you're in the 4th year of uk residency ;)

the talent pool is a lot bigger than India, even though it is super duper.

Indians shouldnt need to go anywhere. It's super duper and very advanced.

That's not a Communist state. It's not really even a Socialist one. Capitalist states with "political connection as the currency" exist all over the world surely. Sheeple exist everywhere and probably to the same extent. They don't make political decisions in Communist societies...