Search results

Of course. Only this time, China is the aggressor and is making up whatever justification they need.

Fyi, I'm fairly certain this is about the 3rd or 4th thread on this same topic that is currently active.

I salute you for your honesty, sir. This is exactly why I posted what I did in this thread.

That fact that you still won't answer what I asked, tells me how bogus your initial objection was. You understood it perfectly...you just didn't like it.

Well, if they are, they are no different than the Chinese posters I encounter here who are utterly oblivious to the nightmare that was Chinese communism up until the reforms of Deng. I don't know how many Chinese PDF posters I've run into who think the tens of millions murdered by their...

Unfortunately, many of them still do. Things like this though, certainly help the cause! :enjoy:

"Celebrity opinions" :rofl:

Oh? Seems pretty clear to me. You obviously can write English so what part did you not understand?

I guess you missed that I am saying exactly the opposite of your little comment. I could care less about international law. This will help encourage that view with the American people. It will help them to realize what a joke it is and that our potential opponents could actually, care less...

The good thing is that it clears the way for the next US president to violate Chinese sovereignty at will. When the Chinese complain, we will remind them they it is they, who have instructed us, that they no longer have any interest in adhering to such legal constraints. It's better for...

I don't talk about global peace. It's foolish to when one has enemies, like Nazi Germany or militant Japan, or total hypocrites like yourself who prove with posts like this that you couldn't give a rat's *ss about the millions that the Nazi's shoved into gas chambers or the Japanese rape of...

That is good. It informs the world that when my country is accused of violating international law by those that oppose us, that it is inevitably by countries that have proven they really don't care about such law. It will give the next US president a freer hand when he needs to violate their...

"Yes" to the first. "No" to the second. Deep dish pizza is an oxymoron. It's not pizza. It's some kind of weird pizzaesque, casserole thing. :cuckoo: Even Chicagoans prefer thin crust to deep dish. http://www.pmq.com/December-2013/GrubHub-Chicagoans-prefer-thin-crust-pizza/

Of course, it had no effect in changing the outcome of the election if it did happen. Hillary Clinton didn't lose because of Russia. She lost because she didn't give a crap about the white working-class male voter.

Which Iranians promised you that? o_O They must have not watched a single minute of the US campaign coverage on TV. Trump made it perfectly clear that one of his first acts as president, in foreign policy, would be the immediate scrapping of the "Iran deal". Russia is a different matter...

Huh? Are you on drugs or something? Just curious...

Only on a board like PDF could a country that attacked all her neighbours and enslaved them, who raped Nanking, who butchered unarmed prisoners, who tortured and murdered fellow Asians by the millions, and them made the fatal mistake of attacking the United States, who defeated her in a brutal...

Right, because that's the kind of thing he's known for. :rofl:

Banks lead U.S. stock indexes higher; dollar jumps to highest value in 14 years http://www.syracuse.com/us-news/index.ssf/2016/12/banks_lead_us_stock_indexes_higher_dollar_jumps_to_highest_value_in_14_years.html Oh yeah, we're hurting alright. :azn:

So in other words, it's good that the US has close relations with the mass murderer, leader of India.....because what he did is none of our business? I just want to make sure I have your thinking correct.