What's new

Indian Govt not to support Bill to declare Pakistan a 'terror state'

BTW.... Why India still not have closed it's embassies in Pakistan?
 
Okay and if they passed that bill then what????o_O

Nothing its just as useless as the resolutions you guys pass in your parliament everytime we excute terrorists on our soil. Its all hot air which literally has no significance what so ever.
 
Last edited:
There is a difference in a "terrorist state" and a "state sponsor of terrorism". If India declares Pakistan a "terrorist state" maintaining diplomatic ties with it become legally untenable. E.g. - Pakistan calls Israel - "Zionistic Entity of Israel" and thus has no formal diplomatic ties with it. India would have no issues in declaring the Pakistani state - "a state sponsor of terrorism" as it can then continue diplomatic relations with it.
 
Looks like they realized and dont wants to get embarrass at international level
 
There are no permanent foes and friends in international politics. Bharat and Pakistan must avoid fanning unnecessary hatred against each other improve their relations in view of a growing regional superpower called
China.
 
Looks like they realized and dont wants to get embarrass at international level

Are you even listening to yourselves... people who live in glass houses should not be throwing stones.

And look who is teaching us about the third world tag a Pakistani:lol:. Indian citizens have visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to 52 countries and territories:azn:. Please check about Pakistani passport. :rofl: second worst. World perception bruh.
On topic, the bill is total absurd. No country would brand another country as terror state. Period

Don't waste your engery on a clueless troll, report and move on...
 
There is a difference in a "terrorist state" and a "state sponsor of terrorism". If India declares Pakistan a "terrorist state" maintaining diplomatic ties with it become legally untenable. E.g. - Pakistan calls Israel - "Zionistic Entity of Israel" and thus has no formal diplomatic ties with it. India would have no issues in declaring the Pakistani state - "a state sponsor of terrorism" as it can then continue diplomatic relations with it.

So amend the wording and re-introduce the bill then. Simple innit? LOL! Who are you kidding?
 
There is a difference in a "terrorist state" and a "state sponsor of terrorism". If India declares Pakistan a "terrorist state" maintaining diplomatic ties with it become legally untenable. E.g. - Pakistan calls Israel - "Zionistic Entity of Israel" and thus has no formal diplomatic ties with it. India would have no issues in declaring the Pakistani state - "a state sponsor of terrorism" as it can then continue diplomatic relations with it.

So India has Pakistan listed as state sponsor of terrorism then? (I believe the US has Syria, Iran and Sudan on its list).

Does India have any other countries on this list?
 
So amend the wording and re-introduce the bill then. Simple innit? LOL! Who are you kidding?
What is "simple innit" - what are you - a Spicegirl? This might surprise you, but since I am not an MP, I can't amend the wording and re-introduce the bill. A private member or a party can. Please feel free to write to them. Simple, isn't it?
 
What is "simple innit" - what are you - a Spicegirl? This might surprise you, but since I am not an MP, I can't amend the wording and re-introduce the bill. A private member or a party can. Please feel free to write to them. Simple, isn't it?

Therefore, since you are not an MP then keep quiet. Why make such a childish comment in the first place. Innit?
 

Back
Top Bottom