What's new

ICJ hearing on Kulbhushan Jadhav case : News, Updates & Discussions

why Pakistan military court let the execution open till that long?

Second, Nawaz and his party (challenging ICJ, giving credibility to ICJ etc.) following indian script that Jindal handed over.

So, what Pakistani people, media and establishment saying about Nawaz following indian script and military court lapse?

Why would pakistan people say anything about which is a figment of your imagination ?
 
It is time for indians to thank Mr. Sharif.

Sad truth for Pak.

Victory for india, courtesy Mr. Sharif.



Is there a grand design being acted upon from within Pak to discredit and demoralise Pak Armed Forces...?

A kind of preparing the ground for an eventuality...

Well, someone has to open the gates of the Fort to let the enemy in... we can not deny what is obvious.


So indians start thanking Mr. Sharif for your spy's life and freedom.
 
why Pakistan military court let the execution open till that long?

Second, Nawaz and his party (challenging ICJ, giving credibility to ICJ etc.) following indian script that Jindal handed over.

So, what Pakistani people, media and establishment saying about Nawaz following indian script and military court lapse?

Why would pakistan people care about something which is a figment of your imagination ?
 
i personally believe that yadav is not alive.pakistan is doing all this for making it's point only.pakistan will never abide by this icj decision.india has done nothing about UN resolution on kashmir tii today.no obligation on pakistan to follow icj.i believe that yadav is not alive.any person who was found to do sabotage activities inside your country must be hanged quickly.we have heard nothing about yadav after his confession tape.army don't care about icj.it's government who is trying to prove his point in icj.
 
No!
This wasn't Hindu-Sikh riot! Yes, Hindus can be accused of not standing up for their brothers, the Sikhs, but the violence was mainly in congress ruled states. Congress and its leaders were the main instigators in all of this. Even Khushwant Singh, the most congress leaning Sikh of those times admits (in his article Victory to the Mob) to BJP leaders such as VAjpayee and Ram Jethmalani going out of their way to save thousands of sikhs. If this was a communal thing, bjp would have been at the forefront of "protecting" Hindu rights as was the case in Babri.

Please see below:

It must be acknowledged that some leaders of the Sangh Parivar and the RSS, including A.B.Vajpayee, went out of their way to help the Sikhs. So, did men like Ram Jethmalani, Soli Sorabjee and a few others."

Sangh saved thousands of Sikhs from being massacred on that fateful day, When my dad was transferred to Delhi and I went to nearby Shakha, when this discussion came up one day, I was told how Pracharaks and Swayamsevaks hid the Sikhs in their houses to save them from Congress goons.


The Hindu non reaction can be attributed to Bindrawale and his own anti-Hindu stance and killings that lost a lot of capital towards the larger Sikh community. RSS inaction to save sikhs on the larger front may have been motivated by this. Wrong as it was, inaction is not the same as killing. I repeat, this wasn't a Hindu - Sikh riot, this was a congress-Sikh riot!



There is no winning in this game, it's just point scoring.
The days of war are done, now is the era of destabilization and economic strangulation.
The problem with Pakistan and ISI is that it's stuck in the era where war and destruction was the only way to settle scores. Once Pakistan moves out of its military mindset and realizes that what funds the military is more important than the military itself, it will be playing an even game with India.

Not to forget, punjabi Hindus in Delhi, from across the political specter, all helped their sikh brothers.

84 was a shame, something that Sikhs will never forget. But blaming it on Hindus is wrong. It was politically motivated.
 
What most Pakistanis here fail to comprehend is that Indian government would never take this case to ICJ and freaking internationalize the case if the guy really was a Raw agent.

Pakistanis here keep saying indians are sneaky, cunning, Chanakya-like creatures. Ask yourself then, would Indians be this stupid if the story your army tells you is really true? Would Indians risk exposing their agent in ICJ? Come on Pakistanis, do you really think the baniyas are that stupid???

Either this guy is not an agent, or he is, but Pakistan have no proof of it. India is certain of one or the other.


My Indian friend, rest assured things will unfold differently than you wish or imagine. What Indians fail to comprehend is that they are fighting a losing battle. Indian decision to approach the ICJ on the Yadav issue is a diplomatic gamble and the max India can attain from it is some face saving, something India is desperately looking for. Pakistan Foreign Office has already made it clear that Pakistan does not accept ICJ's jurisdiction in matters related to National Security but it will present solid evidence against the Indian Spy in the International Court. In other words, Pakistan will go ahead with Yadav's execution if it wills to, with or without ICJ's approval/consent but if Pakistan is able to provide solid evidence against Yadav as claimed by the FO, India will lose the (falsely claimed) moral high ground to accuse Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism in India, ever again. The Indian decision to approach ICJ may prove to have some serious ramifications and unintended consequences for India. Even if the final decision comes in your favor and Pakistan accepts it, one has to be quite naive to believe that Yadav will be proven innocent in a "retrial" that's going to take place in Pakistan anyway. Yadav's only chance was to receive a pardon from the president of Pakistan. Not going to happen now.
 
You don't plan for B after plan A has failed.
We have plan B and C, the verdict is "not hanged him till procedure complete" And also we not gonna hanged him soon anyway.
Meanwhile we also can use ICJ for Kashmir and other issues and India can't skip like before. The bal is still in our court:coffee:
 
i have a question INDIA sent harish salve who is top legal eagle of the country probably after jethmalani or even better than him
what is the credential of the pak lawyer
i mean does pakistan send their best shot
just a genuine query
because i am not aware of the pak lawyer background
i heard he took 5,00,000 pound
 
communal how?????? as far as partisan infact it is a suitable term for your orange media. at least ours have own opinion unlike that of indian one which act upon government policy.
journalists never use word hindus or muslims directly , your choice of words are provocative more of a rabble rousing mullah less of a factual journalism .
Orange media, do you ppl even qualify to talk about others?

b0ffe1aa-34f7-4f5b-b4d7-610281e9a328.jpg
 
Who killed father of the nation?
Who killed most popular female Indian leader?
Who killed sitting P.M in bomb blast?

Remember when your are pointing one finger at other, four finger you himself pointing at you.

BJP a good looking RSS (actually an ugly illegitimate child) killers of Mahatma Gandhi Ji now running India and making it a Cow republic a parallel to banana republic.
I presume assassination and hanging by the State are two different things?
 
I have no clue what you are to lking about. The mods should have a basic grammar test before they give access to people on this forum.

Yep first they also have to do some reading test so some people cnt able to blame other people .....
 
No I think it's a perfect example. Kasab was 25yrs old, India banned Pakistan from having any kind of consular access to him, it took 4yrs for his case and in the end he was trialed.

Kulbushan Jhadhav was found in Pakistan under fake ID, arming and funding terrorism. A 47yr old man. India has failed to respond to that.

Iran can easily be involved and know too well he wasn't 'kidnapped' from their territory.

The delay in the case doesn't mean he's innocent isn't a final verdict. Just like the delay in Kasab's case.

In the end, no one likes anyone stepping into their territory and killing their people.
di
No I think it's a perfect example. Kasab was 25yrs old, India banned Pakistan from having any kind of consular access to him, it took 4yrs for his case and in the end he was trialed.

Kulbushan Jhadhav was found in Pakistan under fake ID, arming and funding terrorism. A 47yr old man. India has failed to respond to that.

Iran can easily be involved and know too well he wasn't 'kidnapped' from their territory.

The delay in the case doesn't mean he's innocent isn't a final verdict. Just like the delay in Kasab's case.

In the end, no one likes anyone stepping into their territory and killing their people.
Pakistan should have approached ICJ for consular access to Kasab.
Pakistanis said that he was not a Pakistani citizen, he was Amar Singh. So how could they have asked consular access for him?
 
I can clearly see the culprit going back to India alive. All eyes on you General Bajwa Sahab, awaam ki nigahen apki taraf hain. You can do justice to the innocent blood of Pakistan. NS Khuda dy Khauf tun dar.
#KalbhushanJhadav #GovtCompromisedKY


Some key points of the judgment by International Court of Justice



    • President of International Court of Justice Ronny Abraham read out the verdict at The Hague.



    • One of the judges was an Indian named Justice Davleer Bhandari. He had served as a senior judge of the Indian Supreme Court.



    • Pakistan did not utilize the option available to it under Article 31 of Statute which allows a party to a case to nominate an individual as a judge on that case only.
    • India had announced that it would challenge Kulbhushan Jadhav’s execution in the International Court of Justice.
    • The International Court of Justice stopped the Indian national’s death sentence and ordered Pakistan to not hang him till the disposal of the said case.



    • The written judgment of the case is eight pages long.



    • ICJ stated that Kulbhushan Jadhav should have been granted consular assistance under Vienna Convention by Pakistan.



    • The court also remarked that Pakistan had sought India’s assistance in investigating Jadhav.


 
No need to waste your time with him. He is Abdul from Pakistan.
Haha. Found this funny. Abdul.

no no no Peshwa all those congressis were hindus. it is the biggest juggulary of words to hide behind the claim that look they were congresdis not Hindus. it was very well Hindus mob. if it had anything to do with only congress then why every time BJP became a party to save those congressis who committed 84 genocide?
Go into the depth.
Most rioters were slum dwellers and indira supporters. Guess which community matches this profile ? Muslims.
 
Back
Top Bottom