What's new

Cyril Almeida and Dr Shahid Masood School of Journalism

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Cyril Almeida and Dr Shahid Masood School of Journalism
cyril-masood-1170x615.jpg



So it seems that Cyril Almeida has been banned from leaving the country. That is a serious punishment for a journalist whose only crime was not writing “Sponsored Content” at the beggining of his story about a civil-military meeting.

Snark aside, lets list the possibilities.

1. Cyril Almeida, who is an Op-Ed writer and has not filed a story for years, went out and got an amazing scoop after hard work and deep analysis.

2. Someone made a story and gave it to Cyril with clear instructions on how to publish it.

3. Cyril Almeida made the whole thing up.

All journalists rallying behind Cyril and Dawn must consider these possibilities before doing so.

If possibility No.1 is true then all journalist must rally behind Dawn and Cyril irrespective of what National Interest is or is perceived to be by our security establishment.

However, if No.2 or 3 are correct then we must recognize Cyril Almeida as the latest student of Dr Shahid Masood School of Journalism and treat him as such and recognize that rallying behind him is detrimental to the cause of free press in the country.

So, what is this School of Journalism? All journalists in Pakistan worth the newsprint their articles are printed upon understand how this school works:
Step number one: Endear oneself to a specific party in Pakistan’s power politics.
Step number two: Air all planted news pretending that you have spent time, effort etc to gather and analyze some crucial information.
Step number three: Profit.

This is how (I think) an establishment ‘journalist’ knows everything about meetings happening behind closed doors. This is how he knows when Army Chief (allegedly) brutally admonishes CM Sindh or Nawaz Sharif in secret meetings. Understandably, the current govt doesn’t like the good Doctor because he is clearly a partisan in the power-play and no longer an objective reporter. His partisanship (in opinion of many commentators) absolves him from the ability to hide behind the banner of “press freedom” while doing what he does. That is the reason behind our deep non-existent respect for such journalists.

Now since I don’t get any information from behind closed doors and don’t have access either to the govt or the military I will have to resort to conjecture.

We can eliminate possibility No.3 (from the aforementioned list of possibilities) because the story is obviously true. Even the first denial published by the PM’s office admitted that the story contains “half-truths”. Half truth is a type of truth and that is the best we can get in this country.

So we are left with possibilities 1 and 2.

If possibility No.1 were true, the civil govt would’ve been in complete disarray and there would’ve been a witch hunt to find the people who leaked the story because they are the actual culprits, not Cyril. It’s not even that hard to find the culprit(s) and start actual legal proceedings against them, because the meeting only had half a dozen or so people and all their names are known. They can be fired, taken to court etc. But we know there is no witch-hunt, no effort to find the real culprits.

Which leaves us with possibility No.2. Whoever leaked the story was sanctioned from the highest levels to do so. This argument gets more weight when we see that the govt is not angry at the story, the military is. Furthermore, we can also see that the military is angry at the government too which can’t be explained if the possibilities 1 and 3 were true.

If this possibility is true we can predict that there will be no witch hunt, and that after temporarily putting Cyril’s name in ECL (which makes no sense whatsoever) the story will be buried and this will go the way Memogate did.

This leads us to the actual story behind the story: Why was this story leaked and by whom? This is what true journalists in Pakistan (if any exist) should be asking.

Of course, all that is just conjecture. I do not know anything. I am not even a true journalist. But all those who are must be wary of supporting a new charlatan just because at the end of the day all underhanded tactics and partisan journalism, irrespective of their political positions, hurt the actual cause of free press in the country.

Clarification: I have used Dr Shahid Masood as an example of a perceived establishment journalist only. He may or may not be actually an establishment stooge, but for sake of exposing a hypocritical stance, I am making an assumption that he is – which may be erroneous. In short, if obvious partisanship and publishing planted material takes from the credibility of one journalist, it should be the same for the other.

Waqas Ahmed is Editor, Digital Media, at Daily Pakistan Global. You can reach him at waqas@dailypakistan.com.pk
 
One drawback of being a "darbari" is one day the emperor (or in this case Ameer Ul Momineen) would ask for your neck. You don't become darbari its retarded, and all those journalist who wish to be known as powerful well they should fck off we already have enough mafias in this country there is no need for another (which by the way journalists already are).
 
Give me anytime a normal journalist not putting harm to our national security over "pseudo intellectuals", who to earn few brownie points (or few thousand dollars), would write any shyte about us.

This is 4th generation warfare, Information is being used as a very lethal weapon.

Unfortunately, wild growth of corporate media has produced so many third-rate Lifafa "journalists/anchors", who would sell even their grandmothers for ratings, without worrying about consequences.
.
This must stop now! Power comes with responsibility and that applies to the "power of pen" as well. No one is above the law!
 
Dr Shahid Masood a journalist??

do u know what is the definition of Journalist??
 
wild growth of corporate media has produced so many third-rate Lifafa "journalists/anchors", who would sell even their grandmothers for ratings, without worrying about consequences.

Dawn was estabilished in 1941 so the equation doesnt really apply here .. also dont you think its little harsh and unfair to pass judements without knowing the facts (which arent disclosed yet !!)
 
Dawn was estabilished in 1941 so the equation doesnt really apply here .. also dont you think its little harsh and unfair to pass judements without knowing the facts (which arent disclosed yet !!)

Oh well, dear pak-marine, of course it used to be a very respectable media outlet, founded by none other than Quaid-e-Azam.

Until it was overtaken by those corporates (Sehgals + Mansha group) and was hijacked by all those foreign NGO-funded "writers".

Within the last 8-9 years this media group along with GEO + Tribune (which anyway is a subsidiary of New York Times) has touched such lows that instead of reading it, you can very well go to TimesOfIndia and read their stories.
 
Oh well, dear pak-marine, of course it used to be a very respectable media outlet, founded by none other than Quaid-e-Azam.

Until it was overtaken by those corporates (Sehgals + Mansha group) and was hijacked by all those foreign NGO-funded "writers".

Within the last 8-9 years this media group along with GEO + Tribune (which anyway is a subsidiary of New York Times) has touched such lows that instead of reading it, you can very well go to TimesOfIndia and read their stories.

the same media outlets when reported on subjects pakistanis like there are threads on this very forum but just because this one is critical of military , there is bashing .. what standard is this .. meetha meetha haap haap .. karwa thoo thoo !!?

By shooting the messanger we are doing nothing but staying in denial mode.
 
the same media outlets when reported on subjects pakistanis like there are threads on this very forum but just because this one is critical of military , there is bashing .. what standard is this .. meetha meetha haap haap .. karwa thoo thoo !!?

By shooting the messanger we are doing nothing but staying in denial mode.

I don't open threads based on contents from DAWN, GEO, Tribune.

Perhaps have seen too much how the propaganda works.

That is: Keep attacking the very core of society, plant doubts in the hearts of populace, forward foreign agenda ... but hey, every now and then throw some random goody-good article, to stay in the race.
 
I don't open threads based on contents from DAWN, GEO, Tribune.

Perhaps have seen too much how the propaganda works.

That is: Keep attacking the very core of society, plant doubts in the hearts of populace, forward foreign agenda ... but hey, every now and then throw some random goody-good article, to stay in the race.

i get it only credible people are who dance to the tunes of army .. rest all are traitors
 
i get it only credible people are who dance to the tunes of army .. rest all are traitors

No, there are many credible people who criticize army. Constructive criticism should always be appreciated.

I am talking about those who do it by design and as a part of larger agenda to harm the national security. All those Hussain Haqqanis, Asma Jahangirs, Hamid Mirs etc etc...
 
If you people don't see that Pakistan is fighting many proxies within its walls, then too bad!!
 
Back
Top Bottom