What's new

Chinese win bid to supply subs to Thailand's navy

Why? They had much much more submarine accidents than China.
According to your logic , Russian submarine must be low quality.

Russian has invented his own submarine by himself from long time ago, China is copied from Russian only. Like what China did with Liaoning carrier.

I don't say that Russian submarine is best in the world. but it is better than China's submarine.
 
Russian has invented his own submarine by himself from long time ago, China is copied from Russian only. Like what China did with Liaoning carrier.


1. Do we had a nuclear submarine to copy?
2. LiaoNing AC was unfinished and destroyed before China bought it.

I don't say that Russian submarine is best in the world. but it is better than China's submarine.

Well, since they had much more accidents than China, they must lower at quality.
That is your logic, right ?
 
Last edited:
1. Do we had a nuclear submarine to copy?
2. LiaoNing AC was unfinished and destroyed before China bought it.

China is copycat, so you could stolen the disign form US or Russia nuclear engine, bro. China bought the unfinished carrier from Ukraine is for copy this basic design. China can't do it by yourself.

Well, since they had much more accidents than China, they must lower at quality.
That is your logic right ?

read carefully my post pls. Russian did it by themself and from long time ago. It sould been more accidents. China has copied from Russian but China has a primitive failure in construction and operations of such submarine. It mean that china's submarine is lower in quality than submarine of Russian.
 
China is copycat, so you could stolen the disign form US or Russia nuclear engine, bro. China bought the unfinished carrier from Ukraine is for copy this basic design. China can't do it by yourself.



read carefully my post pls. Russian did it by themself and from long time ago. It sould been more accidents. China has copied from Russian but China has a primitive failure in construction and operations of such submarine. It mean that china's submarine is lower in quality than submarine of Russian.


Ok, another " I am the justice for right or wrong " monkey.
 
Ha ha, one more superior chinese 孫悟空 , right ?

I mean this kind of monkey.
13726473.jpg


13726481.jpg


13726482.jpg


13726483.jpg


13726490.jpg
 
Last edited:
95 percent of Thai mikitary forumers were heart broken. They hate Chinese subs afraid risking lifes and money to low quality product.

Heres what the Thai Navy really thinks.
Navy Sources State That Buying Chinese Submarines is a Bad Idea

Thailand decision to go for the Chinese submarines is driven partly by the junta government's desire to forge closer relations with Beijing following the May 22 coup that spurred Western countries...

Cabinet ministers, including Gen Prawit and senior army men, have exchanged visits with their Chinese counterparts. China says it wants to strengthen military ties with Thailand, with regular military exercises.

The 36-billion-baht budget covers two submarines, as well as maintenance and training of the navy's personnel. Some reports say China has offered special, undisclosed packages to win the deal.

Navy's B36bn sub purchase plan firms up | Bangkok Post: opinion

China didn't win because of techological superiority but due to added value and geopolitical reasons.

How can China diesel subs be superior over Russia or Germany if their design is a copy of Russia Kilos & Amur/Lada class and using foreign parts like German engines. Their diesel and nuclear subs have serious design flaws like radiation leaks and noise.
 
Last edited:
Heres what the Thai Navy really thinks.
Navy Sources State That Buying Chinese Submarines is a Bad Idea



Navy's B36bn sub purchase plan firms up | Bangkok Post: opinion

Lol China didn't win because of techological superiority but due to added value and geopolitical reasons.

How can China diesel subs be superior over Russia or Germany if their design is a copy of Russia Kilos & Amur/Lada class and using foreign parts like German engines. Their diesel and nuclear subs have serious design flaws like radiation leaks and noise.

Not really.

Thai officials even admitted China won due to superior technology.

Just like China is leading the Turkish SAM deal as it passed the test which the others failed.

Chinese technology is just better.
 
How can China diesel subs be superior over Russia or Germany if their design is a copy of Russia Kilos & Amur/Lada class and using foreign parts like German engines. Their diesel and nuclear subs have serious design flaws like radiation leaks and noise.

That is a huge " if ".
 
95 percent of Thai mikitary forumers were heart broken. They hate Chinese subs afraid risking lifes and money to low quality product.

ma pen lai kraab .... ma pen lai..... :D
 
You know Thailand is a US ally. Doesn't China afraid thier subs secret leak to US?
 
You know Thailand is a US ally. Doesn't China afraid thier subs secret leak to US?
Turkey is US's ally too.
We sold them all kinds of weapons.

Normally, export versions are much different from original versions.

PS. We even sold several dozen DF-3 to Saudi .
 
Last edited:
if Vietnam submarines were so good, they wouldn't have lost all of Xisha. But they did. Makes you think.

Vietnam can never truly win a war against China because they can't take the fight to Chinese territory. It will only be Chinese conducting expeditionary warfare on Vietnam, never the other way around.
 

Back
Top Bottom