What's new

Pakistan refuses to sign three multilateral pacts at SAARC summit: officials

Norwegian

BANNED
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
19,001
Reaction score
11
Country
Israel
Location
Norway
797403-modinawazSAARC-1417004085-522-640x480[1].jpg

KATHMANDU:
Hostilities between India and Pakistan on Wednesday threatened to scupper efforts by South Asian leaders to boost trade among almost a quarter of the world’s people, throwing into doubt any prospect of a regional customs union.


India and Pakistan have fought three wars, and just last month exchanges of fire across the border in Kashmir killed 20 people.

The bickering spilled into a two-day regional summit in Kathmandu, and their leaders refused to meet.

Indian and Nepali officials said Pakistan declined to sign three multilateral pacts with the eight members of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc).

The agreements aim to boost road trade and electricity sharing, including across Pakistan’s heavily militarised border with India.

In an apparent reference to Pakistan, India’s foreign ministry spokesman said one country had cited incomplete “internal processes” for not signing the pacts, but stopped short of naming it.

Pakistani officials did not respond to telephone calls seeking comment.

Such a refusal threatens efforts by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to make South Asia a viable economic counterweight to China and limit Beijing’s role in the region.

Regional integration would happen “through Saarc or outside it,” Modi warned the summit, if the grouping failed to agree on the pacts.

Nepal’s former foreign secretary, Madhu Raman Acharya, echoed the sentiment, urging the grouping to step up “sub-regional cooperation”.

Almost all the leaders at the summit expressed dismay at Sabre’s sparse achievements since it was founded 29 years ago aiming to become a European-style union.

Despite a free trade pact since 2006, trade among South Asian nations makes up five percent of their total trade. They share few transport and power links.

China, free of the baggage that makes much of the region wary of India, has built ports and sold weapons across South Asia, where its new Asian Investment Infrastructure Bank has attracted interest, including from India.

Through Pakistan, China suggested it play a larger role in the regional grouping, but India rebuffed the proposal.

Modi met all SAARC leaders but PM Nawaz

Meanwhile, Modi held two-way talks with every leader except Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, since neither was ready to make the first move to defuse tension between the nuclear-armed states.

Modi relaxed visa rules, spotlighted new energy ties with Bangladesh and Nepal and promised to cut India’s trade surplus with neighbours, but said progress in ties was too slow.

“Is it because we are stuck behind the walls of our differences and hesitant to move out of the shadows of the past?” Modi asked.

The region’s first summit in three years follows some of the worst cross-border violence in the disputed region of Kashmir in a decade, and comes as Nato-led troops prepare to pull out of Afghanistan, intensifying the India-Pakistan rivalry for influence there.

It is also the first time the eight leaders are meeting for the first time since the election of a new government in New Delhi that is taking a more assertive stance on both China and Pakistan.

India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi held his first talks with Afghanistan’s new President Ashraf Ghani on the summit’s sidelines on Wednesday, as New Delhi seeks to develop its involvement in a country that Pakistan considers part of its sphere of influence.

Much of the attention has focused on whether the leaders of India and Pakistan will meet on the sidelines of the summit however, PM Nawaz was reported as saying the ball was in India’s court after New Delhi cancelled talks earlier this year.

“After the recent snub from India, which cancelled foreign secretary-level talks, Pakistan is not going to take the initiative. It will depend whether Modi says he wants to meet,” Pakistani political analyst Talat Masood told AFP.

Hopes of a move towards reconciliation were raised when Modi invited Pakistan’s prime minister to his swearing-in ceremony, but his right-wing nationalist government has adopted a more aggressive policy on Pakistan than its centre-left predecessor.

Modi warned during the recent upsurge in violence in Kashmir that “times have changed and their old habits will not be tolerated”.

On Tuesday, Modi oversaw a $1 billion agreement to build a hydropower plant in neighbouring Nepal, where China has invested heavily in recent years, saying he wanted to “move forward” with deals long delayed by mutual mistrust.

But the mistrust between India and Pakistan – widely seen as the main obstacle to greater South Asian integration – is unlikely to be resolved so easily.

“Saarc’s main problem is that Saarc is basically about India and Pakistan, with the Afghanistan dimension thrown in now,” said Sujeev Shakya, chairperson of the Nepal Economic Forum.

Trade between the Saarc nations – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, the Maldives, Pakistan and Sri Lanka – has grown from under $140 million in 2008 to $878 million in 2012, according to Saarc figures.

But it still accounts for less than five per cent of the region’s total commerce, according to the Washington-based Brookings Institution. By contrast, trade between East Asian nations accounts for nearly 35 per cent of that region’s total.

Security is also likely to be discussed after al Qaeda announced a new South Asia branch and claimed responsibility for a deadly attack on a Karachi naval yard.

Analysts said domestic political concerns would likely take precedence during the Saarc summit, with Modi eager to appear tough on Pakistan during local elections in Indian-administered Kashmir.

Authorities in Kathmandu have spent a reported $10 million on sprucing up the city, repairing its notoriously potholed streets and declaring a two-day public holiday to avert traffic gridlock.

But there is little optimism that much will be achieved.

“It’s time to develop other regional groupings instead of getting bogged down by Saarc, where the conflict between India and Pakistan is a huge obstacle to progress,” said Shakya.
Pakistan refuses to sign three multilateral pacts at SAARC summit: officials – The Express Tribune

Sorry my South Asian neighbors, our rigged PM is the real culprit here and obstacle to peace and stability in the region as well as in Pakistan!

@A.Rafay @Ahmad1996 @airmarshal @Akheilos @Armstrong @arushbhai @AstanoshKhan @AZADPAKISTAN2009 @balixd @batmannow @Bilal. @Bratva @chauvunist @Crypto @Dr. Stranglove @Evil Flare @EyanKhan @Fahad Khan 2 @GIANTsasquatch @graphican @Green Arrow @Guleen Ahmed @HRK @Jazzbot @Junaid B @Jzaib @Khalidr @khawaja07 @KURUMAYA @Leader @Luftwaffe @Marshmallow @mr42O @Muhammad Omar @nomi007 @Pak123 @Pakistani shaheens @Pakistanisage @pak-marine @Peaceful Civilian @pkuser2k12 @Pukhtoon @PWFI @raazh @Rafael @Rashid Mahmood @RescueRanger @Saifkhan12 @Sedqal @SHAMK9 @Spy Master @Stealth @Strike X @SUPARCO @sur @syedali73 @Tameem @TankMan @Tayyab1796 @Zarvan @waleed3601 @AdeelFaheem @Rajput_Pakistani @Men in Green @orakzai4u @IceCold @S.U.R.B. @LoveIcon @razahassan1997 @Cheetah786 @Donatello
@Star Wars @Ammyy @bloo @Marxist @karan.1970 @thesolar65 @Not Sure @Arav_Rana @Avik274 @SamantK @Krate M @Major Shaitan Singh @Omega007 @farhan_9909 @haviZsultan @levina @Sidak @ranjeet @Yogijaat @Ravi Nair @WAR-rior @halupridol @he-man @Indrani @Mike_Brando @SarthakGanguly @sreekumar
 
Sorry my South Asian neighbors, our rigged PM is the real culprit here and obstacle to peace and stability in the region as well as in Pakistan!

There is a thread running on topic already , But it seems Pakistan is the looser as other SAARC nations have already signed the deal with themselves . Pakistan is the only nation left outside and not to mention Isolating itself ..
 
@Norwegian ,buddy the trust deficit between our two nations is the main reason behind this and i don't think it will decease all of a sudden.This deficit is the result of nearly 7 decades of enmity and hence will take time to heal if both the Govts. are ready to do that,which at present seems to be a distant probability!!
 
There is a thread running on topic already , But it seems Pakistan is the looser as other SAARC nations have already signed the deal with themselves . Pakistan is the only nation left outside and not to mention Isolating itself ..
If India and the other countries can "sign trade deals between themselves", then why do you think Pakistan can't?
 
There is a thread running on topic already , But it seems Pakistan is the looser as other SAARC nations have already signed the deal with themselves . Pakistan is the only nation left outside and not to mention Isolating itself ..

The last i knew, Russian Bears want to do business with Pakistan.
So much for isolating it self.

Plus what do we really lose out on from Bangladesh, Nepal or Srilanka? Not much. Visa allowances are already in place. Afghanistan is our backyard.

So much for crying Indians like you.
 
Its the puny establishment of Pakistan that is pushing him. This guy has no balls to stand up against them, yet alone his sole competitor Imran Khan.
Please see the discussion on the pros & cons of open trade with India in the existing thread on the same subject. There are valid reasons against opening up trade with India.
 
@Norwegian ,buddy the trust deficit between our two nations is the main reason behind this and i don't think it will decease all of a sudden.This deficit is the result of nearly 7 decades of enmity and hence will take time to heal if both the Govts. are ready to do that,which at present seems to be a distant probability!!
Nothing to do with any "trust deficit". When Pakistanis and Indians meet abroad, they are like long lost best friends, even more friendly than their own Pakistani or Indian friends. I know it because I have seen it myself. Our governments should reflect ground realities, and ground realities are such that we as a nation we DO NOT hate each other anymore. Its our propaganda ministries run by extreme right wing or left wing that are always spewing hatred between us for their own political goals.
 
You could have if you wanted, but you didn't
So, if the lack of trade agreements between Pakistan and other SAARC nations is by choice, then obviously it is because Pakistan does not see any significant economic advantage in it, which means that any such agreement under the umbrella of SAARC would be subject to the same rationale - so how would you justify your comment that "Pakistan would be the loser if it does not agree to trade under the SAARC umbrella'?
 
Let me know how you are planning to get road transit, or power connection to other SAARC countries without going through India.

Hmm guys be serious for once. Pakistan does not need road transit to Nepal and Bangladesh, not worth it. :coffee:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom