What's new

Which Indian King/Historical event is most under appreciated in Indian History?

anonymus

BANNED
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
3,870
Reaction score
-7
Country
India
Location
India
I am creating this to thread to gain knowledge about those part of history which are usually not taught at school level in detail,and to discuss another side of rulers/Kings who are not given enough significance in Indian history since quantum of achievement is low, even though against much hostile odds than some empire builders.

Members should steer clear of famous Kings like Ashoka and Akbar as everyone knows about them.

I would start by two examples:

1. All non mauryan dynasties of Magadha, especially Ajatashatru.

In my opinion, Ajatashatru , if ever mentioned in history, is mentioned in very negative tenor since he killed his father to ascend throne , killed civilians , and ruthlessly conquered Kosala and Vashali.

His ruthlessness, for which he is berated in mainstream historical discourse, in my opinion is his redeeming quality. He ensured that Magadha , at the time of his death, would be strongest Kingdom in India with only mahajanpada of Avanti being able to offer some resistance. He was a no holds barred commander who took war & conquest seriously , rather than treating it as a quasi sport unlike some of later Kings; and used innovative techniques like siege engines to win.He was someone who stick it to his enemies, a quality sorely missing from a lot of Indian Kings.

The area under his tutelage may have been limited, but he along with his father were chief architect of Magadha Empire which would go on to become a Pan-Indian Empire.

Chandragupta , when he ascended the throne, got a well knit Empire in which Avanti ,which was longstanding competitor, was assimilated by Shishunaga ( who also brought all 16 Mahajanpadas under Magadh Empire ), and Nandas ( could be regarded as first empire builders ) who expanded their kingdom into deccan, and raised a large standing army.

Mauryans on the other hand had it relatively easy. Since tribes of Punjab were already subdued by Alexander, Chandragupta has to just walk into Punjab/Sindh region with his Army ( courtesy Nandas ) and conquer some small kingdoms in South to establish a pan Indian empire.

2. Raja Sukhdeo ( I learned about him on PDF)

Like Battle of Rajasthan ensured that India would not become a Muslim country ( By giving breathing space of 300 years , until Ghaznavid invasion, to India ), Battle of Bahraich fought by Raja Sukhdeo against Mohd. salar masood , nephew of Ghaznavi who invaded India after death of his uncle, ensured that Border of Pakistan passes through middle of Punjab rather than Madhya Pradesh ( He provided India with breathing space of 150 years, till Ghurid Invasions).


Salar massod, who followed his uncle's footstep, invaded India in 1031 AD . In response to this threat Raja Sukhdeo raised a confederate Army and two Armies clashed near Chittaura Jheel, Bahraich. In this battle, whole of Ghaznavid army was slaughtered, thus ending invasion.

Raja Sukhdeo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



@levina @SarthakGanguly @ExtraOdinary @scorpionx @Ravi Nair @anant_s @Indischer @arp2041 @nair @Robinhood Pandey @Roybot @jaunty @Abingdonboy @sancho @Srinivas @gslv mk3 @halupridol @Dash @MohitV @Skull and Bones @acetophenol @IND151 @HariPrasad @he-man @Guynextdoor2 @eowyn @Tridibans @sms @my2cents @jarves @Rajaraja Chola @XiNiX @Android@nik22 @OrionHunter @Star Wars @Nair saab @Indo-guy @Brahmos_2 @desert warrior @gslv @Mike_Brando @oFFbEAT @GR!FF!N @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR @Bang Galore @Dillinger @AUSTERLITZ @sandy_3126 @Dem!god @Kurama @zip @wolfschanzze @RKO @ni8mare @JD_In @illusion8 @kaku1 @blood @ranjeet @GURU DUTT @rockstarIN @IndoUS @SR-91 @danish_vij @kaykay @Black Widow @StormShadow @kurup @raja hindustani @noksss @TejasMk3 @shuntmaster

@sreekumar @45'22' @danger007 @Nova2 @chhota bheem @janon @anonymus @GORKHALI @Tshering22 @SledgeHammer @Sardar Singh @FNFAL @ptltejas @scorpionx @SarthakGanguly @Sidak @levina @thesolar65 @INDIC @Saheli

@joekrish @Sahasranama @axisofevil @ito @Dem!god @khujliwal @Indrani @Jaat Rock @SamantK @arp2041

And anyone whom i may have left.
 
Last edited:
I am creating this to thread to gain knowledge about those part of history which are usually not taught at school level in detail,and to discuss another side of rulers/Kings who are not given enough significance in Indian history since quantum of achievement is low, even though against much hostile odds than some empire builders.

Members should steer clear of famous Kings like Ashoka and Akbar as everyone knows about them.

I would start by two examples:

1. All non mauryan dynasties of Magadha, especially Ajatashatru.

In my opinion, Ajatashatru , if ever mentioned in history, is mentioned in very negative tenor since he killed his father to ascend throne , killed civilians , and ruthlessly conquered Kosala and Vashali.

His ruthlessness, for which he is berated in mainstream historical discourse, in my opinion is his redeeming quality. He ensured that Magadha , at the time of his death, would be strongest Kingdom in India with only mahajanpada of Avanti being able to offer some resistance. He was a no holds barred commander who took war & conquest seriously , rather than treating it as a quasi sport like some of later Kings; and used innovative techniques like siege engines to win.He was someone who stick it to his enemies, a quality sorely missing from a lot of Indian Kings.

The area under his tutelage may have been limited, but he along with his father were chief architect of Magadha Empire which would go on to become a Pan-Indian Empire.

Chandragupta , when he ascended the throne, got a well knit Empire in which Avanti ,which was longstanding competitor, was assimilated by Shishunaga ( who also brought all 16 Mahajanpadas under Magadh Empire ), and Nandas ( could be regarded as first empire builders ) who expanded their kingdom into deccan, and raised a large standing army.

Mauryans on the other hand had it relatively easy. Since tribes of Punjab were already subdued by Alexander, Chandragupta has to just walk into Punjab/Sindh region with his Army ( courtesy Nandas ) and conquer some small kingdoms in South to establish a pan Indian empire.

2. Raja Sukhdeo ( I learned about him on PDF )

Like Battle of Rajasthan ensured that India would not become a Muslim country ( By giving breathing space of 300 years , until Ghaznavid invasion, to India ), Battle of Bahraich fought by Raja Sukhdeo against Mohd. salar masood , nephew of Ghaznavi who invaded India after death of his uncle, ensured that Border of Pakistan passes through middle of Punjab rather than Madhya Pradesh ( He provided India with breathing space of 150 years, till Ghurid Invasions).


Salar massod, who followed his uncle's footstep, invaded India in 1031 AD . In response to this threat Raja Sukhdeo raised a confederate Army and two Armies clashed near Chittaura Jheel, Bahraich. In this battle, whole of Ghaznavid army was slaughtered, thus ending invasion.

Raja Sukhdeo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



@levina @SarthakGanguly @ExtraOdinary @scorpionx @Ravi Nair @anant_s @Indischer @arp2041 @@nair @Robinhood Pandey @Roybot @jaunty @Abingdonboy @sancho @@Srinivas @@gslv mk3 @halupridol @Dash @MohitV @Skull and Bones @acetophenol @IND151 @HariPrasad @he-man @Guynextdoor2 @eowyn @Tridibans @sms @my2cents @jarves @Rajaraja Chola @XiNiX @Android@nik22 @OrionHunter @Star Wars @Nair saab @Indo-guy @Brahmos_2 @desert warrior @gslv @Mike_Brando @oFFbEAT @GR!FF!N @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR @Bang Galore @Dillinger @AUSTERLITZ @sandy_3126 @Dem!god @Kurama @zip @wolfschanzze @RKO @ni8mare @JD_In @illusion8 @kaku1 @blood @ranjeet @GURU DUTT @rockstarIN @IndoUS @SR-91 @danish_vij @kaykay @Black Widow @StormShadow @kurup @raja hindustani @noksss @TejasMk3 @shuntmaster

@sreekumar @45'22' @danger007 @Nova2 @chhota bheem @janon @anonymus @GORKHALI @Tshering22 @SledgeHammer @Sardar Singh @FNFAL @ptltejas @scorpionx @SarthakGanguly @Sidak @levina @thesolar65 @INDIC

And anyone that i may have left.
I think Vijayanagara Kingdom and the Ahoms, there is hardly any history of it in text books only 2 lines about them while major part of it is dedicated to mughal secular rulers courtesy of left marxist historians.
 
Some highly underrated Indian leader in my opinion are C. Rajgopalachari and BR Ambedkar.

Rajgopalachari was leader of secular conservative right wing faction of Congress, which made him Kryptonite for socialist Gandhi/Nehru. What we could have achieved under his leadership compared to Nehru's, given his more rational thinking process and adherence to more successful ideology of Economics , is only bound by imagination.

Some of his quotes.

" since... the Congress Party has swung to the Left, what is wanted is not an ultra or outer-Left [viz. the CPI or the Praja Socialist Party, PSP], but a strong and articulate Right "

"
You may have numbers Nehru, but i am still right "

While Patel has been rehabilitated in Indian history due to growing influence of RSS/BJP, Rajgopalachari is absent from that sad piece of Nehru-Gandhi trash called NCERT history.


Similar is case with Ambedkar.

BR Ambedkar, from everything that i have read about him, was a very rational and logical man who do not fall easily for exotic ideologies.His authorship of Constitution is testimony to that. He was right to center in his politics and economics and was one of person who predicted that unsolved border issue with China will lead to war ( at the time when Nehru was composing love Bards for China ).

He was reduced to a glorified mantlepiece by Gandhi.
 
I am creating this to thread to gain knowledge about those part of history which are usually not taught at school level in detail,and to discuss another side of rulers/Kings who are not given enough significance in Indian history since quantum of achievement is low, even though against much hostile odds than some empire builders.

Members should steer clear of famous Kings like Ashoka and Akbar as everyone knows about them.

I would start by two examples:

1. All non mauryan dynasties of Magadha, especially Ajatashatru.

In my opinion, Ajatashatru , if ever mentioned in history, is mentioned in very negative tenor since he killed his father to ascend throne , killed civilians , and ruthlessly conquered Kosala and Vashali.

His ruthlessness, for which he is berated in mainstream historical discourse, in my opinion is his redeeming quality. He ensured that Magadha , at the time of his death, would be strongest Kingdom in India with only mahajanpada of Avanti being able to offer some resistance. He was a no holds barred commander who took war & conquest seriously , rather than treating it as a quasi sport unlike some of later Kings; and used innovative techniques like siege engines to win.He was someone who stick it to his enemies, a quality sorely missing from a lot of Indian Kings.

The area under his tutelage may have been limited, but he along with his father were chief architect of Magadha Empire which would go on to become a Pan-Indian Empire.

Chandragupta , when he ascended the throne, got a well knit Empire in which Avanti ,which was longstanding competitor, was assimilated by Shishunaga ( who also brought all 16 Mahajanpadas under Magadh Empire ), and Nandas ( could be regarded as first empire builders ) who expanded their kingdom into deccan, and raised a large standing army.

Mauryans on the other hand had it relatively easy. Since tribes of Punjab were already subdued by Alexander, Chandragupta has to just walk into Punjab/Sindh region with his Army ( courtesy Nandas ) and conquer some small kingdoms in South to establish a pan Indian empire.

2. Raja Sukhdeo ( I learned about him on PDF)

Like Battle of Rajasthan ensured that India would not become a Muslim country ( By giving breathing space of 300 years , until Ghaznavid invasion, to India ), Battle of Bahraich fought by Raja Sukhdeo against Mohd. salar masood , nephew of Ghaznavi who invaded India after death of his uncle, ensured that Border of Pakistan passes through middle of Punjab rather than Madhya Pradesh ( He provided India with breathing space of 150 years, till Ghurid Invasions).


Salar massod, who followed his uncle's footstep, invaded India in 1031 AD . In response to this threat Raja Sukhdeo raised a confederate Army and two Armies clashed near Chittaura Jheel, Bahraich. In this battle, whole of Ghaznavid army was slaughtered, thus ending invasion.

Raja Sukhdeo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



@levina @SarthakGanguly @ExtraOdinary @scorpionx @Ravi Nair @anant_s @Indischer @arp2041 @nair @Robinhood Pandey @Roybot @jaunty @Abingdonboy @sancho @Srinivas @gslv mk3 @halupridol @Dash @MohitV @Skull and Bones @acetophenol @IND151 @HariPrasad @he-man @Guynextdoor2 @eowyn @Tridibans @sms @my2cents @jarves @Rajaraja Chola @XiNiX @Android@nik22 @OrionHunter @Star Wars @Nair saab @Indo-guy @Brahmos_2 @desert warrior @gslv @Mike_Brando @oFFbEAT @GR!FF!N @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR @Bang Galore @Dillinger @AUSTERLITZ @sandy_3126 @Dem!god @Kurama @zip @wolfschanzze @RKO @ni8mare @JD_In @illusion8 @kaku1 @blood @ranjeet @GURU DUTT @rockstarIN @IndoUS @SR-91 @danish_vij @kaykay @Black Widow @StormShadow @kurup @raja hindustani @noksss @TejasMk3 @shuntmaster

@sreekumar @45'22' @danger007 @Nova2 @chhota bheem @janon @anonymus @GORKHALI @Tshering22 @SledgeHammer @Sardar Singh @FNFAL @ptltejas @scorpionx @SarthakGanguly @Sidak @levina @thesolar65 @INDIC @Saheli

And anyone whom i may have left.
Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya

The most underrated one..... he could have single handedly changed the fate of modern India....

Hemu - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Samrat_Hem_Chandra_Vikramaditya.jpg
 
Raja Raja Chola by far is the most underrated one.Cholas conquered South India,Sri Lanka going all the way upto Bengal and all habitable parts of SE Asia
And yet our history textbooks make only a passing reference to Chola accomplishments.
250px-Rajendra_map_new.svg.png


I am not Tamil in case you are wondering.
Kaniska is also very underrated.

220px-Kushanmap.jpg
 
The Rashtrakutas and more specifically Govinda III, probably one of India's greatest military commanders. His supremacy was pretty much unquestioned over most of India.


A peculiar phenomenon that i observed while reading about Gujara-Pratihara and Rashtrakuta empires was that while Rashtrakuta satraps use to rebel against central authority at very first opportunity ( Rashtrakuta empire was supplanted by it's satraps), Gujara-Pratihara's satraps remained loyal to central authority long after that empire was just a shell of it's former self.Pratihara empire was thrown out only when a decadent emperor ascended onto throne.

What is your opinion regarding this phenomenon?
 
A peculiar phenomenon that i observed while reading about Gujara-Pratihara and Rashtrakuta empires was that while Rashtrakuta satraps use to rebel against central authority at very first opportunity ( Rashtrakuta empire was supplanted by it's satraps), Gujara-Pratihara's satraps remained loyal to central authority long after that empire was just a shell of it's former self.Pratihara empire was thrown out only when a decadent emperor ascended onto throne.

What is your opinion regarding this phenomenon?

Ambition? The phenomenon of rebelling against any weakened authority anywhere was far more common than remaining loyal. The Rashtrakutas themselves probably were as opportunistic in the beginning , how else does a new dynasty come about?
 
Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya
The most underrated one..... he could have single handedly changed the fate of modern India....

Hemu - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Samrat_Hem_Chandra_Vikramaditya.jpg


While our history books gloss over it ( probably because Mughals won finally ) but Indians Kings have started recovering from shock cavalary tactics of Turkics and started hitting back in early 16th century. Vijaynagar empire was on a winning streak against Bahmani sultanate. Rana sanga won 3 major battles ( Ranthambore, Khatoli, Dholpur) back to back , and was planning to march on Agra.Raja of Jessore declared his independence and capture large part of Bengal.

It was introduction of gunpowder which tilted balance again in favor of Turko-mongols.

The Hemu episode was pure bad luck. He was hit by a stray arrow during battle of Panipat, a battle which he was winning even according to Mughals.

Ambition? The phenomenon of rebelling against any weakened authority anywhere was far more common than remaining loyal. The Rashtrakutas themselves probably were as opportunistic in the beginning , how else does a new dynasty come about?

Yes,

But i have noted that rebellion under Rashtrakutas were more than those under Pratiharas, even though Pratihara empire was weak.
 
Did you mean, "Which Muslim King" that ruled india


I am creating this to thread to gain knowledge about those part of history which are usually not taught at school level in detail,and to discuss another side of rulers/Kings who are not given enough significance in Indian history since quantum of achievement is low, even though against much hostile odds than some empire builders.

Members should steer clear of famous Kings like Ashoka and Akbar as everyone knows about them.

I would start by two examples:

1. All non mauryan dynasties of Magadha, especially Ajatashatru.

In my opinion, Ajatashatru , if ever mentioned in history, is mentioned in very negative tenor since he killed his father to ascend throne , killed civilians , and ruthlessly conquered Kosala and Vashali.

His ruthlessness, for which he is berated in mainstream historical discourse, in my opinion is his redeeming quality. He ensured that Magadha , at the time of his death, would be strongest Kingdom in India with only mahajanpada of Avanti being able to offer some resistance. He was a no holds barred commander who took war & conquest seriously , rather than treating it as a quasi sport unlike some of later Kings; and used innovative techniques like siege engines to win.He was someone who stick it to his enemies, a quality sorely missing from a lot of Indian Kings.

The area under his tutelage may have been limited, but he along with his father were chief architect of Magadha Empire which would go on to become a Pan-Indian Empire.

Chandragupta , when he ascended the throne, got a well knit Empire in which Avanti ,which was longstanding competitor, was assimilated by Shishunaga ( who also brought all 16 Mahajanpadas under Magadh Empire ), and Nandas ( could be regarded as first empire builders ) who expanded their kingdom into deccan, and raised a large standing army.

Mauryans on the other hand had it relatively easy. Since tribes of Punjab were already subdued by Alexander, Chandragupta has to just walk into Punjab/Sindh region with his Army ( courtesy Nandas ) and conquer some small kingdoms in South to establish a pan Indian empire.

2. Raja Sukhdeo ( I learned about him on PDF)

Like Battle of Rajasthan ensured that India would not become a Muslim country ( By giving breathing space of 300 years , until Ghaznavid invasion, to India ), Battle of Bahraich fought by Raja Sukhdeo against Mohd. salar masood , nephew of Ghaznavi who invaded India after death of his uncle, ensured that Border of Pakistan passes through middle of Punjab rather than Madhya Pradesh ( He provided India with breathing space of 150 years, till Ghurid Invasions).


Salar massod, who followed his uncle's footstep, invaded India in 1031 AD . In response to this threat Raja Sukhdeo raised a confederate Army and two Armies clashed near Chittaura Jheel, Bahraich. In this battle, whole of Ghaznavid army was slaughtered, thus ending invasion.

Raja Sukhdeo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



@levina @SarthakGanguly @ExtraOdinary @scorpionx @Ravi Nair @anant_s @Indischer @arp2041 @nair @Robinhood Pandey @Roybot @jaunty @Abingdonboy @sancho @Srinivas @gslv mk3 @halupridol @Dash @MohitV @Skull and Bones @acetophenol @IND151 @HariPrasad @he-man @Guynextdoor2 @eowyn @Tridibans @sms @my2cents @jarves @Rajaraja Chola @XiNiX @Android@nik22 @OrionHunter @Star Wars @Nair saab @Indo-guy @Brahmos_2 @desert warrior @gslv @Mike_Brando @oFFbEAT @GR!FF!N @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR @Bang Galore @Dillinger @AUSTERLITZ @sandy_3126 @Dem!god @Kurama @zip @wolfschanzze @RKO @ni8mare @JD_In @illusion8 @kaku1 @blood @ranjeet @GURU DUTT @rockstarIN @IndoUS @SR-91 @danish_vij @kaykay @Black Widow @StormShadow @kurup @raja hindustani @noksss @TejasMk3 @shuntmaster

@sreekumar @45'22' @danger007 @Nova2 @chhota bheem @janon @anonymus @GORKHALI @Tshering22 @SledgeHammer @Sardar Singh @FNFAL @ptltejas @scorpionx @SarthakGanguly @Sidak @levina @thesolar65 @INDIC @Saheli

And anyone whom i may have left.
 
The Gupta period as a whole was the Golden age of India but never got its due credit. Ours leaders wanted a secular King (esp one who left Hinudism) to symbolize (not literally) our Nation.

Gupta Period had more achievement under their credit than any other period. I think even Raja Raja was a greater King then Ashoka.
 
Vijayanagara i think.... he is great ruler...


Vijaynagara was an Empire that had many Emperors. Few like Harihar and Bukka, andKrishnadevraya are known at least to those who have interest in history. Others are not known to anyone ( even these are not mentioned well in NCERT ).

The Gupta period as a whole was the Golden age of India but never got its due credit. Ours leaders wanted a secular King (esp one who left Hinudism) to symbolize (not literally) our Nation.

Gupta Period had more achievement under their credit than any other period. I think even Raja Raja was a greater King then Ashoka.

I agree on that.

Ashoka got Mauryan empire served on a platter.

Maurya was just a dynasty of Magadha empire. That Empire was welded together before him by Haryank Dynasty, Sishunaga dynasty, Nanda dynasty, and then by his grandfather Chandragupta.
 
Last edited:
Vijaynagara was an Empire that had many Emperors. Few like Harihar and Bukka, andKrishnadevraya are known at least to those who have interest in history. Others are not known to anyone ( even these are not mentioned well in NCERT ).
I am talking about particular Krishnadevaraya ... he was a great ruler.. i forgot to mention his name....
 
I think Vijayanagara Kingdom and the Ahoms, there is hardly any history of it in text books only 2 lines about them while major part of it is dedicated to mughal secular rulers courtesy of left marxist historians.
vijayanagara was a small kingdom similar to the size of Nizam of Hyderabad or Ranjeet singh , however "the Chola Dynasty" was another Beast altogether , & it was one Kick A$$ Power House encompassing south India , parts of indo-china & Indonesia the empire stretched more then 6000 km with a huge area size of 1.3 million sq mi or 3.6 million sq km ! , it was bigger then present day India , UK , & Switzerland combined ! , however, it was more of a south east Asian power, rather then a south Asian one , there for, it is not mentioned much especially in the context of other kingdoms or empires like the Mughals or Maurya's , which were more of a south Asian powerhouse (India-Pakistan -BD & parts of Afghanistan) secondly when it came to the Chola dynasty, the language & culture were also quite different, as it was not an Indo-Iranian one like Sanskrit or Persian which dominated both kingdoms like Maura or Mughals etc & with which both formed a very strong rooted cultural identity, that we see in present day India-Pakistan , as for Ahom again it was too small so as to have the type of historical impact that is needed to, The Chola Empire did it however they did it, in the wrong side of the bay of Bengal ! the realms of power & dominance in south Asia lies in India/Pakistan & Afghanistan, it has always been like that , from the Buddhist periods,
to the Hindu kingdoms to the Muslim ones , heck even Mahabharat needed to be there :lol:

The Chola Empire

 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom