What's new

Hindu Muslim riots in India | 21 people killed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nope My Boy , The hindu Kush was done by us with your ancestors those were later ran away to india and In gujrat you killed your own fellow indians. So In all and all you damaged yourself in our hatred. :lol:

See this is not fair.If Muslims kill Hindu they are your brother, father, ancestors etc. If they are killed , they are our fellow Indian.

What will happen to Muslim Ummah, What about creating other Muslim state from India.
 
Not in UP maybe, cause their sphere of influence haven't collided yet, as I said earlier next in line as Yadavs, one by one they ll all go down, it will be too late by then.

As far as Yadavs and communal riots is concerned, Bhagalpur (Bihar) riots were essentially a Yadavs vs Muslim riot, am sure there are more examples.


They haven't taken lessons from past, they will fall again piece by piece , bit by bit.

I am waiting for 10 more years when Ahirs daughters will be molested in open market in broad daylight. Till then just :sleep:
 
LOL...seriously ?

The Muslim mob who killed the Hindu boys did not know they were Jats. They were killed because they were Hindus.

Tomorrow it will be a Yadav boy.

It is a rather short term view of things. :angel:

Keep your 'one' Hindu theory with You .

All Hindus are not same.

Yadavs are not backing Jats primarily because they don't vote for SP.

If Jats are willing to vote for SP then Yadavs would provide security just like Yadavs enjoys.

Gujjars of western UP vote for SP and hence they are more secure.

This is just real and ugly politics of India.
 
One more partition is required.

Good luck to my sunni indian muslim brothers

if you think its required,you will be pleased to give your part of land to these poor victims.. :pakistan:
 
And no body heard name "India" until Persian called it so

Wrong.. Persian called it Hindustan and not India, India was first used by Greeks to denote the entire Indian subcontinent more that two and half millennia ago,
 
THis regions is called a subcontinent because, the regions is separated from rest of continental Asia by physical features like Mountain ranges(Himlayas in East and North, Hindu Kush in the west) and Indian ocean in the South.

And the reason it is called 'Indian subcontinent' because the entire region was settled by people of Indic origin...and was generally regarded as single Nation state even before Alexander invaded..something akin to a Greek Nation ..which had many small states like Athens, Sparta, Macedonia etc..which were at times separated and warring, and other times united into one nation but were together known as single Nation called Greece.

*I have already explained name India was given to this region because of Indus River not Tamil Nadu
*Sub-continent is the most diverse region on earth be it ethnicity, language or religion
*Even genetic studies also tell the people are genetically different with two major groups and sub-groups
 
Keep your 'one' Hindu theory with You .

All Hindus are not same.

Yadavs are not backing Jats primarily because they don't vote for SP.

If Jats are willing to vote for SP then Yadavs would provide security just like Yadavs enjoys.

Gujjars of western UP vote for SP and hence they are more secure.

This is just real and ugly politics of India.
@Roybot, @notsuperstitious @kaykay @Arav_Rana @Ayush read this jem AHIRS are demanding protection fee in the form of votes, isn't this Dadagiri and insight into their real motive behind riots ??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wrong.. Persian called it Hindustan and not India, India was first used by Greeks to denote the entire Indian subcontinent more that two and half millennia ago,

You are wrong Persian still call it Hind not Hindustan although the word Hindustan is also Persian
 
Not in UP maybe, cause their sphere of influence haven't collided yet, as I said earlier next in line as Yadavs, one by one they ll all go down, it will be too late by then.

As far as Yadavs and communal riots is concerned, Bhagalpur (Bihar) riots were essentially a Yadavs vs Muslim riot, am sure there are more examples.

True !

Interest of Yadavs and muslims have not collided yet and Mulayam singh Yadav will ensure they will not collide in future too.


What happened in bhagalpur riots ? I'm curious ,can you elaborate more.
 


MY COUNTRY WAS PARTITIONED IN 1947 ,GO AND READ HISTORY BOOKS

British Empire partitioned, dont read history from RSS mandir. Your daddy British partitioned his empire before leaving.
 
Nope those remained back were still the owner of their ancestry lands , but your ancestor who tried to confront us were defeated badly by our well organized forces .
Which our forces. The one who butchered your forefathers and reped your grand moms?
 
*I have already explained name India was given to this region because of Indus River not Tamil Nadu
*Sub-continent is the most diverse region on earth be it ethnicity, language or religion
*Even genetic studies also tell the people are genetically different with two major groups and sub-groups

sir,what's the problem with indian subcontinent??:P
 
If you look at the history of Hindu Muslim riots in India, the instigator has always been the Muslims. Hindus do not attack unless attacked.

Not just Hindus. Anyone. Even white gangs like EDL who get fed up, attack only when 'British Muslims' hurl curse words at British troops, that too in UK.
 
@Roybot, @notsuperstitious , read this jem AHIRS are demanding protection fee in the form of votes, isn't this Dadagiri and insight into their real motive behind riots ??

BJP lao UP bachao. No other option. Us UP wallahs need to stop voting for small regional caste based parties like RLD. RLD did jackshyte for the Jats, I hope this incident has opened their eyes.

A united Hindu vote bank is the only answer to this Muslim vote bank.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom