Bugti speaks the truth about Baloch seperatists

[Imran Khan]

How is this a proof of anything ?

What a pro Pakistan Balochi says is not the proof of anything as long as the freedom fighters themselves don't admit to any support from India .There are traitors to every cause , this one being no different .

Is this the great evidence of Indian support to Baloch freedom fighters that Pakistan has been talking about showing for the last 4 years ? Now I know why they don't share it . They don't want to get laughed at .

same as omar abdullah say kashmir is indian part ? abut freedom fighters as we know kashmiri HIZB UL commander say we will fight to inida till last drop of blood as india showing it since last 64 years let alone 4 years of pakistan you know why i lughed because of your post

 

[Redbull]

self-delete.

 

[Redbull]

The newspaper neither states nor infers that either

About the former part , I never said that. I just said that the statement becomes more credible when the so called supported group accepts the support itself rather than some anti Indian/ Pro Pakistani dude making an assertion . However , if some pro Pakistani Baloch can provide some concrete proof to establish his statements then that can be considered valid proof too but just statements themselves don't mean anything .

The degree of credibility varies greatly and for obvious reasons .

When a crime is committed , would it be more credible if the criminal himself admits his crime or will it be more credible if the best friend of the victim makes a statement against the accused without any concrete proof ? Whose statement will the Court give more credence to for obvious reasons ? I don't think I can explain it more simply than this .

First of all, if a country gives a passport to a wanted terrorist of another country then that country is helping them.

Regarding the rest---I guess that was the excuse I was expecting, when other analyst expose Indian propaganda, it is a conspiracy, when Baloch Bugtis themselves say they are happy, they are "anti-Indian/Pro-Pakistani".

I guess you can't really argue with this type of mentality.

 

[American Pakistani]

The UN does not use the term illegally occupied for Kashmir . Please show me an official UN document which does and I shall believe you for sure.

And Balochistan is not comparable with Khalistan simply because Whole of India is a Sikhs Khalistan and the magnitude of the two movements as they stand today are very different .Balochistan today can be compared better with the Khalistan movement in 1980s .

Also a separatist movement is a separatist movement . Just because Kashmir is disputed does not make it any different from Balochistan ..

Balochistan is comparable to Khalistan every now & then, infact i beleive situation in Khalistan is more worst, in may there were protests in Ludhiana & they didn't let police or army in. The situation was terrible.

Also stop dragging Kashmir into the thread, it is illegally occupied by india & is disputed territory.

 

[Kompromat]

Anyone has a Full program?

 

[Hyde]

Anyone has a Full program?

Here you go - He is Sarfraz Bugti, son of one of the chiefs of Bugti tribe Mir Ghulam Qadir Bugti

Waqtnews (Khabrain) Hot Line (Balochistan Critical Issues) 06 July 2012 - YouTube

 

[Pakistanisage]

Pakistan should not be giving money to Baloch Politicians. Pakistan should be spending this money directly on Baloch Education, Health, Welfare and infrastructure.

 

[Well.wisher]

Jak maarte Hain.