Troops in Afghanistan ... in order to keep an eye on Nuclear Pakistan

[Dalit]

Realistically 2500 troops wouldnt be able to do much against the taliban let alone pakistan. The troops are their providing advisory and training to local forces. Also special operations/intelligence is also very crucial. In all honesty I dont get what the hype is with the US keeping a small contingent of troops. It would infact serve Pakistans interest. The govt and military have both stated they dont want the US to completely leave the region esp with a resurgent isis.

lastly this isnt the afghanistan of 1999. The taliban wont role into kabul in tanks. The war has already been won by them. Biden has no choice but a political settlement where the taliban play a major role in the afghan govt. A national govt which is supported by the taliban is already being discussed in Washington

It doesn't matter. The Americans will have their answer if they opt for treachery once again. We will sit back and watch what they do.

 

[Path-Finder]

The idea is not to invade Pakistan but to have a say in the affairs of the region. As long as NATO exist in Afghanistan in any shape or form, they will have the capability to keep tabs on Pakistan as well as influence course of events in Afghanistan.

I always await your appearance!

 

[LeGenD]

I always await your appearance!

Your point? Kindly elaborate.

 

[Path-Finder]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1367650969052413952

Lol denying it all now.
Can anyone find the original when he made the comments?

I saw a journalist use a term 'Taliban Tet-Offensive' and that is what is most likely going to happen. Taliban today enjoy support from China and Russia who are global players. The role of the the US in afghanistan is like the crusading states that were holding onto what little territory they had left on the Levant coast. which were brought down one after another.

They cannot remain in afghanistan without Pakistan. They need to remain in afghanistan to keep an eye on China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan and all of CAR's. BUT this is going to only bring about an counter in the shape of China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan joining hands as their interest intertwine as the threat to all these nations is sitting in afghanistan.

stay and its NOT going to be easy, leave its not going to be easy. its die either way. so choose your death.

 

[HRK]

Didn’t realize the extent of the mission creep

A logical piece of analysis at 'FOX News' about this region particularly Afghanistan ..... I must say I am surprise

 

[Path-Finder]

Didn’t realize the extent of the mission creep

Yes I saw this few days ago and I wasn't sure if it was an early april fools or something else. true there are many many pablo escobars in afghanistan.

 

[Dalit]

A logical piece of analysis ai 'FOX New' about this region particularly Afghanistan ..... I must say I am surprise

You will be surprised. The right-wing had a change of heart since Trump became their leader. Trump wasn't anti-war, but he had other ideas about wasting money in foreign lands. Trump made a lot of sense in that regard.

 

[Iñigo]

It was predictable that Pakistan would enter the western empire's wish list

---

there are three epochs in the history of the American Empire

(1846 - 1945)

This part of the story begins with the intervention in Mexico ...

Mexican–American War - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

and reaches the Philippines ... and is magnificently summarized in a small text by a general of the Marine Corps: "War is a racket"

(1945 - 1991)

America continues Adolf's War

This era begins with the bright and luminous founding act in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to make it clear to Russians who the "top dog" is

A good introduction to this epoch is "The Jakarta Method"

The Jakarta Method - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

(1991 - 2020)

By this time perhaps a place to start would be professor Chalmers Johnson's trilogy

But in summary, the two guiding lines are, on the one hand, to destroy the countries of Islamic culture that are disobedient to the Anglo-zionist-wahhabi Empire heirs of the British Empire and, on the other hand, to continue with the obsession with imperial hegemony: Russia and China

 

[Path-Finder]

Your point? Kindly elaborate.

hmmn, I know what I want to say but (proverbially)I will be wasting my breath on you!

 

[Dalit]

It was predictable that Pakistan would enter the western empire's wish list

---

there are three epochs in the history of the American Empire

(1846 - 1945)

This part of the story begins with the intervention in Mexico ...

Mexican–American War - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

and reaches the Philippines ... and is magnificently summarized in a small text by a general of the Marine Corps: "War is a racket"

(1945 - 1991)

America continues Adolf's War

This era begins with the bright and luminous founding act in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to make it clear to Russians who the "top dog" is

A good introduction to this epoch is "The Jakarta Method"

The Jakarta Method - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

(1991 - 2020)

By this time perhaps a place to start would be professor Chalmers Johnson's trilogy

But in summary, the two guiding lines are, on the one hand, to destroy the countries of Islamic culture that are disobedient to the Anglo-zionist-wahhabi Empire heirs of the British Empire and, on the other hand, to continue with the obsession with imperial hegemony: Russia and China

That is essentially what this is all about. The imperialists want to suck it all up.

 

[LeGenD]

hmmn, I know what I want to say but (proverbially)I will be wasting my breath on you!

This is flamebaiting, dear. If you have something to say then say it and do not try to flamebait me.

This is the second time you have done this. You better speak now or I will take action.

 

[Path-Finder]

This is flamebaiting, dear. If you have something to say then say it and do not try to flamebait me.

This is the second time you have done this. You better speak now or I will take action.

you take your action.

 

[LeGenD]

you take your action.

Most unfortunate.

 

[Dalit]

Most unfortunate.

That was unnecessary. You quarrel with a countrymen which is one thing. You don't exercise your priviliges during open discussion.

 

[LeGenD]

That was unnecessary.

He Flamebaited me openly and intentionally. I cautioned him in this regard and told him to speak his mind and his response to me is "you take your action." What I am supposed to make of all this? He have done this before as well.

This is absolutely weird behavior on his part.