Disturbing comments left on an internet article

[Awesome]

We must win the war on terror even if it means:-

1) the deaths of terrorists and their friends,
2) those who don't support us in the war on terror and their friends,
3) those who we suspect to be terrorists and their friends;
4) those who we suspect are not with us (although not against us) in the war on terror;
5) those in countries that may become terror states;
6) the inhabitants of the Axis of Evil countries;
7) Effectively 75%, or more of world's population must die in order for us to win the war on terror.

We the British think that this is a small price to pay peace and security in the world today.


Posted by Major John Driver on November 9, 2007 10:05 AM

It was posted under the famous "Sonofab" editorial. Won't link to it, out of protest. Easy to find from Google News though.

Anyway, I don't think Major J. Driver's exercising sarcasm here. Very disturbing. From my observation people who've served are less likely to encourage rampant carnage.

 

[roadrunner]

Who cares?

 

[Spring Onion]

What you expect from these moroons who are burdening their own people for paying billions of taxs just to carry on carnage of innocent people in Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Pakistan.

the real Sob****

 

[MIG_ACE]

What you expect from these moroons who are burdening their own people for paying billions of taxs just to carry on carnage of innocent people in Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Pakistan.

the real Sob****

Bullsh*t! The iraqis themselves are killing their own brethren with suicide bombings in marketplaces and mosques. In afghanistan the americans are killing (or trying to kill) the ruthless Taliban who are far from innocent. Infact they are the ones creating trouble in Pakistan too.

 

[roadrunner]

Bullsh*t! The iraqis themselves are killing their own brethren with suicide bombings in marketplaces and mosques. In afghanistan the americans are killing (or trying to kill) the ruthless Taliban who are far from innocent. Infact they are the ones creating trouble in Pakistan too.

Well, that's nonsense. Iraq was pretty stable prior to the invasion. Weren't any suicide bombers then. Why is that?

 

[MIG_ACE]

Well, that's nonsense. Iraq was pretty stable prior to the invasion. Weren't any suicide bombers then. Why is that?

Because firstly saddam was a dictator and he did a good cover up job on the atrocities committed against the shias and the minorities like kurds.
Secondly one sect represented by saddam ruled the others with an iron fist and when the US eliminated saddam the ones he had oppressed decided to get even. The sunnis fought back .. hence all the suicide attacks.

Tell me one thing though, do you actually believe that the US army engineered all the suicide attacks and bombings in public places that killed more iraqi civilians than the war ever did? Because otherwise there is no reason to blame the US.

 

[Cheetah786]

Because firstly saddam was a dictator and he did a good cover up job on the atrocities committed against the shias and the minorities like kurds.
Secondly one sect represented by saddam ruled the others with an iron fist and when the US eliminated saddam the ones he had oppressed decided to get even. The sunnis fought back .. hence all the suicide attacks.

Tell me one thing though, do you actually believe that the US army engineered all the suicide attacks and bombings in public places that killed more iraqi civilians than the war ever did? Because otherwise there is no reason to blame the US.

StumbleUpon » StumbleVideo

 

[Awesome]

Because firstly saddam was a dictator and he did a good cover up job on the atrocities committed against the shias and the minorities like kurds.
Secondly one sect represented by saddam ruled the others with an iron fist and when the US eliminated saddam the ones he had oppressed decided to get even. The sunnis fought back .. hence all the suicide attacks.

Tell me one thing though, do you actually believe that the US army engineered all the suicide attacks and bombings in public places that killed more iraqi civilians than the war ever did? Because otherwise there is no reason to blame the US.

Isn't the west spitting out more n more often that we all MUST be killed.

 

[roadrunner]

Because firstly saddam was a dictator and he did a good cover up job on the atrocities committed against the shias and the minorities like kurds.

Many atrocities were committed in Rwanda, several other places round the globe, nothing was done.

Secondly one sect represented by saddam ruled the others with an iron fist

Not true. Saddam was secular. He had a Christian vice president and several shia party members.

and when the US eliminated saddam the ones he had oppressed decided to get even.

The Shia as far as I recall didn't take out any revenge. It was only when their shrines were bombed in Iraq (again which never happened under Saddam), that the Shias started doing reprisals.

The sunnis fought back .. hence all the suicide attacks.

Well no. The Sunni extremists (or conspiracy theorists, the CIA), bombed the Shias Holy Shrines, and the Shia took revenge, and then the Sunnis their own.

Tell me one thing though, do you actually believe that the US army engineered all the suicide attacks and bombings in public places that killed more iraqi civilians than the war ever did? Because otherwise there is no reason to blame the US.

According to the Lancet, 100,000 Iraqi civilians were killed in 1-2 years of conflict. Just because one side has technology, the other does not, won't excuse the fact that less people were dying when Saddam was in charge. Even the Lacet study acknowledges this.

The risk of death was estimated to be 2·5-fold (95% CI 1·6–4·2) higher after the invasion when compared with the preinvasion period.
http://www.zmag.org/lancet.pdf

 

[Always Neutral]

Well, that's nonsense. Iraq was pretty stable prior to the invasion. Weren't any suicide bombers then. Why is that?

Dear RR,

For once I must agree. Having visited Iraq the only people who were afraid of Saddam were

1. Religious Men who wanted religion to be the basis of Iraq's future.
2. People who wanted to topple him.
3. Kurds who wanted independence.

Infact by toppling him USA and unfortunately UK have left a trail of destruction. I am happy we are withdrawing our troops from there.

Regards

 

[Always Neutral]

Because firstly saddam was a dictator and he did a good cover up job on the atrocities committed against the shias and the minorities like kurds.
Secondly one sect represented by saddam ruled the others with an iron fist and when the US eliminated saddam the ones he had oppressed decided to get even. The sunnis fought back .. hence all the suicide attacks.

Tell me one thing though, do you actually believe that the US army engineered all the suicide attacks and bombings in public places that killed more iraqi civilians than the war ever did? Because otherwise there is no reason to blame the US.

Dear Mig,

Care to explain why did India support the King in Nepal or Junta in Burma and oh before I forget Saddam himself for all these years if they were bad for their countries ?

Regards

 

[MIG_ACE]

The Sunni extremists (or conspiracy theorists, the CIA), bombed the Shias Holy Shrines, and the Shia took revenge, and then the Sunnis their own.

So you do believe that the US army engineered all the bombings of the shrines and other places.
What I don't get is why in hell would they do that? They would have known that they would have to take care of the resulting mess. Why would they want to do that?

 

[Always Neutral]

So you do believe that the US army engineered all the bombings of the shrines and other places.
What I don't get is why in hell would they do that? They would have known that they would have to take care of the resulting mess. Why would they want to do that?

I don't believe the above but where ever you remove the centre of authority miscreants step in and take advantage. Iraq was all about oil.

Regards

 

[Ababeel]

These Indians believe that they can say anything and the rest of the people will accept it without analysing. We must read their mind carefully as they are not able to stop their own Fascists (say Modis, Katyars, Thackrays etc.) and going to teach a lesson to rest.

 

[roadrunner]

So you do believe that the US army engineered all the bombings of the shrines and other places.
What I don't get is why in hell would they do that? They would have known that they would have to take care of the resulting mess. Why would they want to do that?

There's plenty of reasons. I guess being a neocon supporter your IQ would have to be a bit low. Here's one scenario though. Cause a civil war, let them dunk it out, then you steal the oil from under their noses. Give them something to do away from what you're doing in other words.