What's new

Operation Asifa: 45 Indian soldiers killed by Kashmiri resistance in Pulwama.

The militants just escalated it one level up higher just like they did in APS Peshawar in Pakistan and look what happened to them.
This incident is in no way comparable to the APS attack - the APS attack was a deliberate terrorist attack on a school full of children, with the specific intent to kill innocent children, with a much higher death toll.
 
It was never before elections and was never predicted.
This one was predicted by even a common man in Pakistan.

Who told the beneficiary was any political party in Pakistan. It was your establishment who gained from APS false flag, as per you logic. So an election is not an issue for them.
 
Amen ... go to hell this humanitarian thing ... snakes needs to be treated like snakes
What is GOI won't accept ??? I think it is a chance and a reason for our government to initiate an operations just like your Operation Zarb-e-Azb or Operation Raad ul fassad.

And guess what after this incident on one in this word is going to question any such Operation. The militants just escalated it one level up higher just like they did in APS Peshawar in Pakistan and look what happened to them.
 
@CHACHA"G"
Before you post yet another attack against me and my moderation, please read my responses to the Iranian member you are so critical of, both in this thread and the thread on the attack in Iran.
 
This incident is in no way comparable to the APS attack - the APS attack was a deliberate terrorist attack on a school full of children, with the specific intent to kill innocent children, with a much higher death toll.

Atleast you agree that both are terror attacks, huh ??? So every nation reserve the right to act and Operate against terrorist in the way they deem fit.
 
i think they killed a jaish boy yesterday so it was just a payback.as you sow so shall you reap.india isn't innocent.india is on a killing spree in kashmir so it's just a reminder from jaish.lol
 
Atleast you agree that both are terror attacks, huh ??? So every nation reserve the right to act and Operate against terrorist in the way they deem fit.
No, I don't. India is suffering attacks on her security forces in disputed territory it continues to occupy through force, refusing to implement UNSC Resolutions that call for a UN plebiscite to allow the residents of J&K to determine which country they wish to be a part of.

Had this been an attack on civilians, like the Mumbai attacks or APS massacre, I would absolutely agree that this was a terrorist attack.
 
No, I don't. India is suffering attacks on her security forces in disputed territory it continues to occupy through force, refusing to implement UNSC Resolutions that call for a UN plebiscite to allow the residents of J&K to determine which country they wish to be a part of.

Had this been an attack on civilians, like the Mumbai attacks or APS massacre, I would absolutely agree that this was a terrorist attack.

Well when we consider the entire world, your words neither mean a think nor carry any weight. Now no one can stop government of India from escalating it into any level so that we can make sure every terrorist (as per us) and her sympathizers are hunted down. Just wait and watch the show as a spectator. ;)
 
What if GOI won't accept ??? I think it is a chance and a reason for our government to initiate an operations just like your Operation Zarb-e-Azb or Operation Raad ul fassad.

And guess what after this incident on one in this word is going to question any such Operation. The militants just escalated it one level up higher just like they did in APS Peshawar in Pakistan and look what happened to them.

well that is why Dialog's are for, no one will agree to first proposed terms, your Govt will add some points so does our Govt but in the end both country should listen to what Kashmiri people have to say ..

For you Operations like Zarb-e-Azb and Raddul Fassad may backfire because you are not just fighting a Terror Group , Kashmir is a resistance movement and people seen it as such , TTP was and will remain a Terrorist group because they have done 70-80% of their attacks on Civilians , same can not be said for Kashmiri fighters .

APS Peshawar attack was highly motivated on the ideology of them slaughtering kids of Army personnel , I don't see Kashmiri people doing that , even this Attack is against the CRPF which is i think a Paramilitary force .
 
Well when we consider the entire world, your words neither mean a think nor carry any weight. Now no one can stop government of India from escalating it into any level so that we can make sure every terrorist (as per us) and her sympathizers are hunted down. Just wait and watch the show as a spectator. ;)
India will do what it must, but since you asked for my opinion, I gave it to you, with my reasons. My opinion remains unchanged.
 
we should also prepare.focus on the border.tensions will increase.indian forensic team on the spot.they will plant evidence now.pakistan should better prepare.provide anza and anti tank missiles to forward location posts.loc is going to flare up.
 
@CHACHA"G"
Before you post yet another attack against me and my moderation, please read my responses to the Iranian member you are so critical of, both in this thread and the thread on the attack in Iran.
Below is your reply ……. He called it Islamic terrorism , he gave Sunni Islam names , he called us barking ,, and what not and you said he/she entitled to have opinion !!!!!! you call that sectarian BS opinion ?????? Why he is not ban ???? Do you know what he did on thread about 6 years old kid got killed in KSA ???
001.png
 
But in the case of this particular disputed territory, J&K, isn't that (peace through brutality) exactly what the Indian State is doing? By deploying hundreds of thousands of security forces to control the State and refusing to allow a UN led plebiscite, isn't India waging it's own campaign of 'peace through brutality'?
Sort of, but not exactly for the same reasons and on a much minor scale. First off, the hundreds of thousand have to do less with Kashmir itself, rather they're there because Kashmir is the sour point between Pakistan and India and the focus of most wars between us. Armed separatism is a recent occurrence in Kashmir.

As far as the Indian government is concerned, Kashmir is an integral part of India. India doesn't see a need to settle with the Kashmiris. It's already settled that Kashmir is Indian territory. There is no need for peaceful resolution because the issue was resolved 70 years ago. Everything else is agression from other parties.

Then there is the issue of scale. Remove Pakistan from the equation and the Kashmir issue is diminished, the Kashmiri separatists have almost 0 bargaining power, and all the chips are in India's hands.

Quite simply, peace with Pakistan is a good thing to have down the road and might be benificial. Peace with Kashmir is an afterthought.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom