What's new

The U.S. Just Became a Net Oil Exporter for the First Time in 75 Years

Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
28,395
Reaction score
-82
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...t-oil-exporter-for-the-first-time-in-75-years

America turned into a net oil exporter last week, breaking almost 75 years of continued dependence on foreign oil and marking a pivotal -- even if likely brief -- moment toward what U.S. President Donald Trump has branded as "energy independence."

The shift to net exports is the dramatic result of an unprecedented boom in American oil production, with thousands of wells pumping from the Permian region of Texas and New Mexico to the Bakken in North Dakota to the Marcellus in Pennsylvania.

While the country has been heading in that direction for years, this week’s dramatic shift came as data showed a sharp drop in imports and a jump in exports to a record high. Given the volatility in weekly data, the U.S. will likely remain a small net importer most of the time.

“We are becoming the dominant energy power in the world,” said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research. “But, because the change is gradual over time, I don’t think it’s going to cause a huge revolution, but you do have to think that OPEC is going to have to take that into account when they think about cutting.”

The shale revolution has transformed oil wildcatters into billionaires and the U.S. into the world’s largest petroleum producer, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia. The power of OPEC has been diminished, undercutting one of the major geopolitical forces of the last half century.

The shift to net exports caps a tumultuous week for energy markets and politics. OPEC and its allies are meeting in Vienna this week, trying to make a tough choice whether to cut output and support prices, risking the loss of more market share to the U.S.

"The week started with Qatar leaving OPEC; then a mysterious U.S.-Saudi bilateral meeting in Vienna; followed by a canceled OPEC press conference, and now the latest news that the U.S. turned last week into a net petroleum exporter," said Helima Croft, commodities strategist at RBC Capital Markets LLC and a former analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency.

The U.S. sold overseas last week a net 211,000 barrels a day of crude and refined products such as gasoline and diesel, compared to net imports of about 3 million barrels a day on average so far in 2018, and an annual peak of more than 12 million barrels a day in 2005, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

The EIA said the U.S. has been a net oil importer in weekly data going back to 1991 and monthly data starting in 1973. Oil historians that have compiled even older annual data using statistics from the American Petroleum Institute said the country has been a net oil importer since the mid-1940s, when Harry Truman was in the White House.

Read more about OPEC’s deliberations in Vienna

On paper, the shift to net oil exports means that the U.S. is today energy independent, achieving a rhetorical aspiration for generations of American politicians, from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush. Yet, it’s a paper tiger achievement: In reality, the U.S. remains exposed to global energy prices, still affected by the old geopolitics of the Middle East.

U.S. crude exports are poised to rise even further, with new pipelines from the Permian in the works and at least nine terminals planned that will be capable of loading supertankers. The only facility currently able to load the largest ships, the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, is on pace to load more oil in December than it has in any other month.

The massive Permian may be even bigger than previously thought. The Delaware Basin, the less drilled part of the field, holds more than twice the amount of crude as its sister, the Midland Basin, the U.S. Geological Service said Thursday.

While the net balance shows the U.S. is selling more petroleum than buying, American refiners continue to buy millions of barrels each day of overseas crude and fuel. The U.S. imports more than 7 million barrels a day of crude from all over the globe to help feed its refineries, which consume more than 17 million barrels each day. In turn, the U.S. has become the world’s top fuel supplier.

“The U.S. is now a major player in the export market,” said Brian Kessens, who helps manage $16 billion at Tortoise in Leawood, Kansas. “We continue to re-tool our export infrastructure along the Gulf Coast to expand capacity, and you continue to see strong demand globally for crude oil.”
 
"Energy independence" does not have to be a brief period if the USA continues to move to energy conservation and efficiency measures as well as to add more solar and wind resources. Also, if we could get past irrational fears we could add more nuclear generation. We have plenty of USA-based uranium.
 
"Energy independence" does not have to be a brief period if the USA continues to move to energy conservation and efficiency measures as well as to add more solar and wind resources. Also, if we could get past irrational fears we could add more nuclear generation. We have plenty of USA-based uranium.

Trump is old school. Don't like solar and wind. More coal. More oil. More gas.
 
"While the net balance shows the U.S. is selling more petroleum than buying, American refiners continue to buy millions of barrels each day of overseas crude and fuel. The U.S. imports more than 7 million barrels a day of crude from all over the globe to help feed its refineries, which consume more than 17 million barrels each day. In turn, the U.S. has become the world’s top fuel supplier."
Including itself.. :lol:
that is tricky..
 
Whole gulf arab states are their slaves it not matter for u.s to become exporter of oil when saudis and other arab nations export oil by using dollars which give more benefit to u.s than oil exporting arab countries.U.s has captured oil wells in iraq and has huge sources of oil offshelf in other countries
 
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...t-oil-exporter-for-the-first-time-in-75-years

America turned into a net oil exporter last week, breaking almost 75 years of continued dependence on foreign oil and marking a pivotal -- even if likely brief -- moment toward what U.S. President Donald Trump has branded as "energy independence."

The shift to net exports is the dramatic result of an unprecedented boom in American oil production, with thousands of wells pumping from the Permian region of Texas and New Mexico to the Bakken in North Dakota to the Marcellus in Pennsylvania.

While the country has been heading in that direction for years, this week’s dramatic shift came as data showed a sharp drop in imports and a jump in exports to a record high. Given the volatility in weekly data, the U.S. will likely remain a small net importer most of the time.

“We are becoming the dominant energy power in the world,” said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research. “But, because the change is gradual over time, I don’t think it’s going to cause a huge revolution, but you do have to think that OPEC is going to have to take that into account when they think about cutting.”

The shale revolution has transformed oil wildcatters into billionaires and the U.S. into the world’s largest petroleum producer, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia. The power of OPEC has been diminished, undercutting one of the major geopolitical forces of the last half century.

The shift to net exports caps a tumultuous week for energy markets and politics. OPEC and its allies are meeting in Vienna this week, trying to make a tough choice whether to cut output and support prices, risking the loss of more market share to the U.S.

"The week started with Qatar leaving OPEC; then a mysterious U.S.-Saudi bilateral meeting in Vienna; followed by a canceled OPEC press conference, and now the latest news that the U.S. turned last week into a net petroleum exporter," said Helima Croft, commodities strategist at RBC Capital Markets LLC and a former analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency.

The U.S. sold overseas last week a net 211,000 barrels a day of crude and refined products such as gasoline and diesel, compared to net imports of about 3 million barrels a day on average so far in 2018, and an annual peak of more than 12 million barrels a day in 2005, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

The EIA said the U.S. has been a net oil importer in weekly data going back to 1991 and monthly data starting in 1973. Oil historians that have compiled even older annual data using statistics from the American Petroleum Institute said the country has been a net oil importer since the mid-1940s, when Harry Truman was in the White House.

Read more about OPEC’s deliberations in Vienna

On paper, the shift to net oil exports means that the U.S. is today energy independent, achieving a rhetorical aspiration for generations of American politicians, from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush. Yet, it’s a paper tiger achievement: In reality, the U.S. remains exposed to global energy prices, still affected by the old geopolitics of the Middle East.

U.S. crude exports are poised to rise even further, with new pipelines from the Permian in the works and at least nine terminals planned that will be capable of loading supertankers. The only facility currently able to load the largest ships, the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, is on pace to load more oil in December than it has in any other month.

The massive Permian may be even bigger than previously thought. The Delaware Basin, the less drilled part of the field, holds more than twice the amount of crude as its sister, the Midland Basin, the U.S. Geological Service said Thursday.

While the net balance shows the U.S. is selling more petroleum than buying, American refiners continue to buy millions of barrels each day of overseas crude and fuel. The U.S. imports more than 7 million barrels a day of crude from all over the globe to help feed its refineries, which consume more than 17 million barrels each day. In turn, the U.S. has become the world’s top fuel supplier.

“The U.S. is now a major player in the export market,” said Brian Kessens, who helps manage $16 billion at Tortoise in Leawood, Kansas. “We continue to re-tool our export infrastructure along the Gulf Coast to expand capacity, and you continue to see strong demand globally for crude oil.”
if it is true which is unlikely then world may get peace finally because hunger for petrol makes USA kill millions in the world on the name of terrorism
 
Trump is old school. Don't like solar and wind. More coal. More oil. More gas.
Trump is a temporary political force. He will, most likely, not be re-elected unless the Democrats are totally stupid about such things as the "Green New Deal". Even if he is re-elected he represents only a future six year effect on American policy. In the intermediate term (20 years) and long run (50 years), Trump's particular fixations are not important. I have confidence that the USA will use fossil fuels for the next 50 years while technology is developed to have an energy system based on solar processes, with the exception of major portions of the transportation sector, especially air travel, which will still use carbon fuels because of their inherent superior energy density.
 
if it is true which is unlikely then world may get peace finally because hunger for petrol makes USA kill millions in the world on the name of terrorism
o_O

Was the world at peace long before America was born?
 
o_O

Was the world at peace long before America was born?
usa killed more people in 240 years of its existence then whol of human war in history
usa in wars since 1776.. i am writing major war not the small onece whom are thousands as well

American Revolution, 1775–83

War of 1812

Mexican War, 1846–48

civil war 1861,1865



Indian wars, in American history, general term referring to the series of conflicts between Europeans and their descendants and the indigenous peoples of North America.

Spanish-American War, 1898, brief conflict between Spain and the United States arising out of Spanish policies in Cuba. It was, to a large degree, brought about by the efforts of U.S. expansionists.

World War I, 1914–18, also known as the Great War, conflict, chiefly in Europe, among most of the great Western powers. It was the largest war the world had yet seen.

World War II, 1939–45, worldwide conflict involving every major power in the world. The two sides were generally known as the Allies and the Axis.

Korean War, conflict between Communist and non-Communist forces in Korea from June 25, 1950, to July 27, 1953

Bay of Pigs Invasion, 1961

Vietnam War


Dominican Republic (1965)

Lebanon (1982-1984)


Grenada (1983) President Reagan invaded the Caribbean nation

Panama (1989)


Persian Gulf Wars


Bosnia and Herzegovina

Somalia (1993)

Kosovo 1999

so called Global War on Terrorism 2001

Afghanistan 2001...


Iraq war

i am not writing about small conflicts. which have killed thousands if not millions.aboue all are major conflicts apart from small. they are in thousands.if you want to know you may vist this link. you will surprise how many millions they have killed..
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
 
Even if he is re-elected he represents only a future six year effect on American policy.

I think Pence would be prez after Trump no? The US economy is doing great. Democrats have no chance and no platform.
 
This "article" is two months old and the headline is still as wrong as it was before. You should read especially the junk Bloomberg publishes past the headline. Anyone with at least basic reading comprehension and enough brains to check their source after reading trough the contradictionary report itself, should have been able to see trough this junk some tards dare to call journalism. Then its just decency and honesty to admit its bullshit.

They are talking about a net crude net finished products net export. Thats just a dumb construed excuse to pull of this story. The EIA report they are refering to clearly marks out the U.S. remained a net oil importer. Its just two numbers, simple substraction and there is nothing to discuss about this fact contradicting the notion of the entire article. Even if you account in the "other supplies" its still net import. (If any of you just thought about hitting Google because you don't actually understand the difference to conjure another dumb comback in denial you are exactly the illiterate brainless sheep this cheap propaganda is made for. Just rubbing it in to the usual smartass "expert" flies.)

The definition of energy independency they claim to have been achieved is also meaningless. You cant just dump "net" crude into refineries. You just dumped another article you didnt read on your routine that literally says it will take until 2020 in the headline to reach that, citing U.S. Department of Energy projections based on its bubbling industry. At least makes the lies consistent with each other.

The fact this bullshit made it past their editors and remains still unedited speaks volumes about Bloomberg.
 
Last edited:
The fact this bullshit made it past their editors and remains still unedited speaks volumes about Bloomberg.

Let's instead quote another news outlet that we all agree is perpetually clueless and talks perpetual bullshit due to it being run by complete retards.

http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-12/07/c_137657344.htm
2018-12-07
U.S. oil export exceeds import, first time in decades
 
Last edited:
perpetually clueless and talks perpetual bullshit
run by complete retards.
I doubt Bloomberg is clueless and run by retards. They are just as dishonest and ruthless as you and deliberately try to perpetuate missinformation and lies and hope it picks up one way or another, be it confusion, naivety, blind trust or just subconscious influence by constantly poisoning the well and serves their political agendas.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom