What's new

Why not the F/A-18EF SuperHornet?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reality Check: The F-18 is more sanction prone than the F-16.

With the F-16's there are multiple supplier options available. With the F-18...........?
pakistan is sourcing surplus f16's and thats all it should focus on for now.
 
A reasonable plane for NAVY if 60 Units are offered at realistic rates due to age of the plane (second hand) nature
 
No one has made a comment about the two engines of the Super Hornet :-)
I guess if PDF net warriors can handle a twin engined fighter that means they have given their blessing to the PAF :pakistan:

Not a super hornet

cgsy6hhqqaysdjx2ejxq.jpg
 
The hornet has lot of reputation as Battle Hardened jet , can't be overlooked

However it might be a bit , out dated compared to Sukhoi-35 Jet

su35_6.jpg




FA-18EF-vs-Flanker-1.png





Vs the hornet
CF-18-Hornet-Cockpit.jpg




Also the internal fuel capacity is low
Internalfuelcapacities.jpg



Sukhoi-35 offer a more capable plane , lasts longer in air no need for refueling and carry tones of weapons , and had advance avionics package best in its generation

Its a no brainer
 
Last edited:
A reasonable plane for NAVY if 60 Units are offered at realistic rates due to age of the plane (second hand) nature

Why would USA offer them to Pakistan in the first place, realistically speaking?
 
Boeing has no need for the F-18 either.

Boeing Plans to Keep Super Hornet Line Open After Positive Signs From Congress, International Customers - USNI News

Today, Gillian said “we’re doing everything we need to be able to continue production to meet U.S. Navy and international fighter needs.”


“Based on positive marks from all four defense committees and continued discussions on near-term‎ international sales, we’re moving forward with decisions to keep the line open and preserve future options,” the company added in a statement to USNI News.




MSF13-0082-071.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom