What's new

Uighurs seek a passage to India

IBRIS

BANNED
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
2,696
Reaction score
-1
With Han Chinese flooding Xinjiang — a region struggling with ethnic strife — the demoralized natives seek refuge across the border to escape the oppression...

When Ibrahim was investing in new computers to upgrade his web business, he could not have imagined being bankrupted by a government-imposed internet blackout after deadly riots between Muslim Uighurs and Han Chinese in July.

On July 4th, Ibrahim was buoyant with the hope of tapping into China’s burgeoning online business market, encouraged by the influx of the companies to the oil-rich region. But by the end of that same week Ibrahim knew he had to shut shop.

As Hu Jintao hurried back from the G8 summit in the wake of the most violent riots in decades, Beijing cut Xinjiang’s 20 million residents off from internet in an effort to insulate the province and ease ethnic tension.

"Hundreds of internet businesses are bankrupt, so where is the economic development they talk about? I want to move to India, I don’t want to invest any money here. My friends and I started to research routes (through Leh) to India, but it is policed well in China," he said. "Thousands are disappearing (into prisons) — they weren’t rioting, but they were young and Muslim." he said.

Ibrahim holed himself up in his home after a brutal crackdown on Uighurs paralysed Urumqi following protests on July 5th.

According to the state media, 197 people were killed and 1,721 injured, most of them Han, assaulted by Uighurs. In response, vigilante Han Chinese mobs armed with butcher knives and axes taped to sticks stormed Uighur neighbourhoods seeking vengeance.

Mass arrests of Muslim men followed. Uighur women took to the streets to protest the arrests of "grandfathers and 11-, 12-year-old boys." A Human Rights Watch report published in October confirms that 43 Uighurs are still missing.

Before Ibrahim saw his savings go out with the light on his modem, he could not imagine living anywhere but Kashgar, and encouraged his family to learn Mandarin and become a part of the fabric of greater China.

"When I saw signs that you cannot go to mosque if you are a government employee or a working person, I thought okay, better to focus on business than pray. I thought only (political) troublemakers are punished but I know the innocent people who disappeared . I saw some who came back tortured. I am ashamed to say I am afraid to even help those families."

One such victim was Turghan. When Turghan was finally freed from prison last month, after 12 years of torture, his wife didn’t recognize him. Instead of the husband she remembered, a handicapped, hunchbacked man stood before the family.

His sister-in-law Rahima remembers Turghan as a handsome, popular trader in Gulja’s main market. "His crime was that he was Muslim right after the Gulja uprising of 1997, when Chinese authorities put pressure on local police to find ringleaders," she said.

In February 1997 riots erupted on the streets of Gulja to protest mass arrests of Muslims. Troops stormed Gulja after two days of protests, using teargas and ammunition to disperse the crowds, and arresting so many young men that they had to be detained at the local sports stadium, according to Amnesty International. As the temperature dropped, detainees were hosed with water and several lost fingers and toes to frostbite before they could even be questioned.

Today, the Chinese state media is full of warnings that Xinjiang remains a turbulent, untamed area because of its 5,600-km border with Russia to the north, India to the south, Mongolia to the east and Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India to the west.

Months after the Urumqi riots, the border city of Kashgar still has troops on alert. Tajik and Khyrgyz traders have gone back to selling silks, blankets and beauty creams in the main Sunday Bazaar but the slow pace of business is punctuated by a column of soldiers marching through at regular intervals.

Michael, a foreigner working in Kashgar is "disgusted" by what he calls counter-productive security measures. "The government says it has no problem with Muslims and then sends 500 soldiers to point guns at Uighurs coming out of Kashgar’s main mosque the day after riots in Urumqi. How can tensions die down?" As he finishes speaking, three trucks full of soldiers in riot gear roll by. Troops point their weapons at passers by as loudspeakers announce: "Don’t do anything (illegal ) to hurt national unity.

Driving along the remnants of the fabled silk route from Kashgar to Yarkand to Hotan, as the road cuts effortlessly through majestic mountain passes that dissolve into the sand dunes of the Taklamakan dessert, it is easy to forget the region’s recent upheaval. But the 50,000 soldiers that have flooded towns across Xinjiang serve to remind you that you are being watched and tracked, your identity card and passport numbers duly noted.

According to T P Sreenivasan, former Indian ambassador, "What China is doing in Xinjiang is identical to what they did in Tibet — repressing the minority, giving Han Chinese economic incentives to move there and creating tensions. The point is to destroy the Uighur culture and control the region. India should take note because China has been increasingly aggressive over Arunachal Pradesh. If they can colonize their own minorities to break down the Muslim community, imagine the aggression they are willing to use on outsiders."

David Goodman explains Beijing’s ominous agenda in his article, ‘China’s campaign to open up the West’. "The 1990s (saw) comprehensive measures spurring Han settler colonization, exploitation in the oil-rich Tarim basin; and the building of key transport infrastructure in Southern Xinjiang," under the guise of economic development , and resulting in friction with the indigenous Uighurs. Beijing has relocated entire communities of impoverished Han Chinese in a wave of mass migration that took Xinjiang’s Han population from four per cent in 1949 to 40.6 per cent in 2000 (according to census data).
Ibrahim cannot help feeling frustrated about Hu Jintao’s recent comments about a return to normalcy in the region.

"We want dignity, what is normalcy?" he asks as his friends lapse into Uighur, talking excitedly about reports of Tibetans living in India, free from the fear of persecution, free to speak against the oppression of their people "back home."

"We can do more from India. We thought of Pakistan, but they have returned Uighur refugees to China. India has welcomed Tibetans and we are similar," he reasons before turning back to the heap of coffeestained notes and maps with highlighted routes into India strewn over his keyboard and table.
Uighurs seek a passage to India - China - World - The Times of India
 
Now it will be interesting to see the stance india takes, whether it will support the cause of the uighurs or take a non-commital approach
 
sino you are a very good poster when you post without emotions clogging your brain...it takes a racist to see a racist...we are humans....over-burdened but still humane.

Truth is the truth. Lies are lies.

In last few weeks TOI have censored their past comments/stories (i.e. try searching for past comments and stories) due to the world-wide condemnation of their un-professionalism. I had high hopes of Indian Media, was going to congratulate them for diverging away from pathetic hate-mongering propaganda..... seems my hopes were premature. :disagree:

There's always tomorrow. There's always tomorrow.:angel:
 
interesting.

What would be Indian stance

As an Indian I would say let the Chinese sort out their own mess. If people are being tortured in their country then they may apply for asylum in any other country and if they qualify in terms of international qualifications then India must do its duty. The Pakistani approach of just shipping them back to China as alleged is against international norm though. Considering that these are Muslims I wonder whether that is a correct report :undecided:
 
Actually Uighurs would rather go for the central-asian region why India?
The Uzbeks,Tajiks and Kazakhs would certainly sympathise with them
 
I guess China would love to dump those violant thugs to India, and keep those peace-loving ones inside.

The more the better.
 
They should be and will be welcomed in India.

Any reason? Why India would welcome and should welcome?

Is it not going to create problems for India viz viz its relations with China.

And how would you accomodate them without creating any tension within your own ethnic groups. I mean we already seen the situation regarding Bangladeshi migrants in India how would this new arrival would be seen there
 
They should be and will be welcomed in India.

They are not welcomed to India at all. As it is we have our set of problems. Let them live and settle issues in China.
 
Any reason? Why India would welcome and should welcome?

Is it not going to create problems for India viz viz its relations with China.

India has the highest numbers of Tibetan refugees as well as a significant number of Chinese immigrants who fled Tibet and China respectively because of oppression. In fact every single year, we read reports of Tibetans fleeing to India. They are not stopped by the authorities. The Uighurs would be no different.

And how would you accomodate them without creating any tension within your own ethnic groups. I mean we already seen the situation regarding Bangladeshi migrants in India how would this new arrival would be seen there

Completely different. There are literally millions of Bangladeshis in India, all illegally. The Uighurs would be no way near that numbers and would ask for political asylum.

They are not welcomed to India at all. As it is we have our set of problems. Let them live and settle issues in China

Don't be ridiculous. What kind of nation would India be if it stopped people from escaping repression?
 
I am wondering why there in no words from Arab and Muslim countries?Even if a Muslim is killed in a road accident every one in up in ante against India hurting Muslim sentiments..now in that statement showing peoples are disappearing and they are not even allow to go to mosque for pray..still no criticism ,no objections??don't you think its a double standard from Muslim nations and members here??
 
I am wondering why there in no words from Arab and Muslim countries?Even if a Muslim is killed in a road accident every one in up in ante against India hurting Muslim sentiments..now in that statement showing peoples are disappearing and they are not even allow to go to mosque for pray..still no criticism ,no objections??don't you think its a double standard from Muslim nations and members here??

Interesting. Very correctly said.
If a Muslim injures himself in a road accident in India, Pakistan takes no time to describe it as a communal violence on minority.
Where did they go now when Uighurs are butchered like animals.
 
World Refugee Survey 2009, published by the US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, found 456,000 refugees and asylum seekers in India. That includes about 110,000 Tibetans. India also tolerates a huge number of Bangladeshis within its borders - many millions, by some estimates - although they are officially deemed illegal immigrants.

In neighbouring Pakistan, the numbers are even more confronting. Despite battling insurgency and economic collapse, Pakistan hosts nearly 2 million Afghan refugees. Tens of thousands of them have been allowed to set up businesses and make their home in Pakistan's cities and towns while they wait for the United Nations to find them a new home.

We are all part of the human family and we should be about doing what all good families do - caring for our less fortunate brothers and sisters.
- Dan O'Neill, Founder, Mercy Corps
 
Even if a few make it to India, what different would it make to India....?
China supports ULFA and Naga freedom

Hey at least India has the balls to stand up for Muslims unlike some countries who has disowned Islam and its believers
for some spare change and an assembly line of a useless aircraft
 
Even if a few make it to India, what different would it make to India....?
China supports ULFA and Naga freedom

Hey at least India has the balls to stand up for Muslims unlike some countries who has disowned Islam and its believers
for some spare change and an assembly line of a useless aircraft

Oh we have our self a new troll
 

Back
Top Bottom