What's new

Saudi Arabia Will Go It Alone

Arabian Legend

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 7, 2012
Messages
5,155
Reaction score
9
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia Will Go It Alone


London — Saudi Arabia has been friends with our Western partners for decades; for some, like the United Kingdom where I serve as ambassador, for almost a century. These are strategic alliances that benefit us both. Recently, these relationships have been tested — principally because of differences over Iran and Syria.

We believe that many of the West’s policies on both Iran and Syria risk the stability and security of the Middle East. This is a dangerous gamble, about which we cannot remain silent, and will not stand idly by.


The crisis in Syria continues unabated. There have been over 100,000 civilian deaths. Most shockingly of all, the Oxford Research Group reports that of the 11,000 victims under 17 and under, more than 70 percent were killed by air strikes and artillery shells deliberately targeting civilian areas.

While international efforts have been taken to remove the weapons of mass destruction used by the murderous regime of Bashar al-Assad, surely the West must see that the regime itself remains the greatest weapon of mass destruction of all? Chemical weapons are but a small cog in Mr. Assad’s killing machine. While he may appear to be going along with every international initiative to end the conflict, his regime will continue to do everything in its power to frustrate any serious solution.

The Assad regime is bolstered by the presence of Iranian forces in Syria. These soldiers did not enter Syria to protect it from a hostile external occupation; they are there to support an evil regime that is hurting and harming the Syrian people. It is a familiar pattern for Iran, which has financed and trained militias in Iraq, Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon and militants in Yemen and Bahrain.

And yet rather than challenging the Syrian and Iranian governments, some of our Western partners have refused to take much-needed action against them. The West has allowed one regime to survive and the other to continue its program for uranium enrichment, with all the consequent dangers of weaponization.

This year’s talks with Iran may dilute the West’s determination to deal with both governments. What price is “peace” though, when it is made with such regimes?

The foreign policy choices being made in some Western capitals risk the stability of the region and, potentially, the security of the whole Arab world. This means the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has no choice but to become more assertive in international affairs: more determined than ever to stand up for the genuine stability our region so desperately needs.

Saudi Arabia has enormous responsibilities within the region, as the cradle of Islam and one of the Arab world’s most significant political powers. We have global responsibilities — economic and political — as the world’s de facto central banker for energy. And we have a humanitarian responsibility to do what we can to end the suffering in Syria.

We will act to fulfill these responsibilities, with or without the support of our Western partners. Nothing is ruled out in our pursuit of sustainable peace and stability in the Arab World as King Abdullah — then Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince — showed with his leadership of the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


We showed our preparedness to act independently with our decision to reject a seat on the United Nations Security Council. What point was there in serving in an international talking shop when so many lives are threatened, and so many opportunities for peace and security are being thwarted by the U.N.’s inability to act?

We continue to show our determination through our support for the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian opposition. It is too easy for some in the West to use the threat of Al Qaeda’s terrorist operations in Syria as an excuse for hesitation and inaction. Al Qaeda’s activities are a symptom of the international community’s failure to intervene. They should not become a justification for inaction. The way to prevent the rise of extremism in Syria — and elsewhere — is to support the champions of moderation: financially, materially and yes, militarily, if necessary. To do otherwise is to walk on by, while a humanitarian disaster and strategic failure continue to fester.

Saudi Arabia will continue on this new track for as long as proves necessary. We expected to be standing shoulder to shoulder with our friends and partners who have previously talked so much about the importance of moral values in foreign policy. But this year, for all their talk of “red lines,” when it counted, our partners have seemed all too ready to concede our safety and risk our region’s stability.

Mohammed bin Nawaf bin Abdulaziz al Saud is Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to Britain.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/18/opinion/saudi-arabia-will-go-it-alone.html?_r=0
 
Seems like a cry for attention, instead of talking about "going it alone" why don't they actually do something?

Reminds me of this Shia leader in Saudi Arabia's assessment, the KSA government is all talk:

 
Seems like a cry for attention, instead of talking about "going it alone" why don't they actually do something?

Reminds me of this Shia leader in Saudi Arabia's assessment, the KSA government is all talk:


That wasn't what you mother said, boy.


Yeah, we only talk big :lol:

Guess what? We busted the terrorist


Actions speak louder than word!

:rofl:
 
Saudi Arabia Will Go It Alone

...

London — The foreign policy choices being made in some Western capitals risk the stability of the region and, potentially, the security of the whole Arab world. This means the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has no choice but to become more assertive in international affairs: more determined than ever to stand up for the genuine stability our region so desperately needs.

Saudi Arabia has enormous responsibilities within the region, as the cradle of Islam and one of the Arab world’s most significant political powers. We have global responsibilities — economic and political — as the world’s de facto central banker for energy. And we have a humanitarian responsibility to do what we can to end the suffering in Syria.

We will act to fulfill these responsibilities, with or without the support of our Western partners. Nothing is ruled out in our pursuit of sustainable peace and stability in the Arab World as King Abdullah — then Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince — showed with his leadership of the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

We showed our preparedness to act independently with our decision to reject a seat on the United Nations Security Council. What point was there in serving in an international talking shop when so many lives are threatened, and so many opportunities for peace and security are being thwarted by the U.N.’s inability to act?

We continue to show our determination through our support for the Free Syrian Army and the Syrian opposition. It is too easy for some in the West to use the threat of Al Qaeda’s terrorist operations in Syria as an excuse for hesitation and inaction. Al Qaeda’s activities are a symptom of the international community’s failure to intervene. They should not become a justification for inaction. The way to prevent the rise of extremism in Syria — and elsewhere — is to support the champions of moderation: financially, materially and yes, militarily, if necessary. To do otherwise is to walk on by, while a humanitarian disaster and strategic failure continue to fester.

Saudi Arabia will continue on this new track for as long as proves necessary. We expected to be standing shoulder to shoulder with our friends and partners who have previously talked so much about the importance of moral values in foreign policy. But this year, for all their talk of “red lines,” when it counted, our partners have seemed all too ready to concede our safety and risk our region’s stability.

Mohammed bin Nawaf bin Abdulaziz al Saud is Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to Britain.

Just... Wonderful. ^^


...
 
Last edited:
That wasn't what you mother said, boy.

Yeah, we only talk big :lol:

Guess what? We busted the terrorist

Actions speak louder than word!

:rofl:

Mother jokes, really?

Yeah it's easy for you guys to catch terrorists, after all it takes one to know one. :)
 
Not a joke, it is an expression.

Mother jokes, really?

Yeah it's easy for you guys to catch terrorists, after all it takes one to know one. :)

He's speaking for the fantasies of his masters, the originators of terrorism. As a matter of fact, his masters were the 1st ones to carry terror attacks.

We learn from you bro :lol:
 
Not a joke, it is an expression.
Well whatever it was it didn't make much sense.

He's speaking for the fantasies of his masters, the originators of terrorism. As a matter of fact, his masters were the 1st ones to carry terror attacks.

We learn from you bro :lol:

No, no, I insist, you guys are the masters of terrorism. Nobody even comes close. :)
 
this is laughable, the most incompetent useless country in the world trying to act tough

Yeah, they are incompetent to the level which led one of them to capture a Russian solider

See the Ruskies guy? He's sh!ting in his pants! :lol:

Next ...

Well whatever it was it didn't make much sense.

No, no, I insist, you guys are the masters of terrorism. Nobody even comes close. :)

We should learn from the ones who stormed the US embassy in Tehran :lol:

Not to mention the first suicide bomber of modern history.
 
We should learn from the ones who stormed the US embassy in Tehran :lol:

Not to mention the first suicide bomber of modern history.

Storming an embassy is much different then flying planes into buildings killing thousands and thousands of people, no? Also martyr Fahmideh took his life to disable a tank in a crucial battle in a war time situation. Much different then blowing yourselves up amongst civilians Saudi style.
 
Storming an embassy is much different then flying planes into buildings killing thousands and thousands of people

Storming the US embassy in Tehran was approved by the Head of the State back in the day. While 9/11 was planned and engineered by a terrorist origination. You did put your finger on the bottom though, Iran shares the same doctrine of Al-Qaida i.e. terrorizing people to gain political objectives, but Iran is far worse than that, it broke the entire charts of international laws on diplomatic missions.

Also martyr Fahmideh took his life to disable a tank in a crucial battle in a war time situation. Much different then blowing yourselves up amongst civilians Saudi style.

Thanks to Mr. Fahmideh, he inspired all terrorists around the globe, which of course include, Al-Qaida linked- Saudi terrorists.

Unlike you, when a terror attack takes place, we condemn it, while you keep chasing Israelis or Jews from Bulgaria to Argentina.


Storming an embassy is much different then flying planes into buildings killing thousands and thousands of people, no? Also martyr Fahmideh took his life to disable a tank in a crucial battle in a war time situation. Much different then blowing yourselves up amongst civilians Saudi style.
 
Storming the US embassy in Tehran was approved by the Head of the State back in the day. While 9/11 was planned and engineered by a terrorist origination. You did put your finger on the bottom though, Iran shares the same doctrine of Al-Qaida.



Thanks to Mr. Fahmideh, he inspired all terrorists around the globe, which of course include, Al-Qaida linked- Saudi terrorists.

Unlike you, when a terror attack takes place, we condemn it, while you keep chasing Israelis or Jews from Bulgaria to Argentina.

What's the difference from what martyr Fahmideh done to what soldiers have done in wars for millenia, for example kamikaze Japanese soldiers. He was fighting an enemy and he took his own life in order to disable an enemy tank. Now the real inspiration for Saudi suicide bombers is Islamic Jihad during the Lebanese Civil War in 1983, from there on in Al-Qaeda and other Saudis/Saudi inspired organizations have used suicide bombings to terrorise civilian populations around the globe. I hope you are able to tell the difference between an enemy fighter and innocent civilians btw.

Also I have seen you personally cheering on Al-Qaeda terrorists in this forum like your "you read what you sow" comment in the other thread. Anyway it is not important even if you condemn your fellow countrymen publicly whilst you continue to finance their terrorist activities privately.
 
Now the real inspiration for Saudi suicide bombers is Islamic Jihad during the Lebanese Civil War in 1983, from there on in Al-Qaeda and other Saudis

In 1983, there was no Al-Qaida bro. The suicide bombings came from Amal, a Shia militia. :rofl:


other Saudis/Saudi inspired organizations have used suicide bombings to terrorise civilian populations around the globe. I hope you are able to tell the difference between an enemy fighter and innocent civilians btw.

Suicide bombings took place within KSA itself, tens of Saudis died in these attacks.

I hope you are able to tell the difference between an enemy fighter and innocent civilians btw.

No, I stay on my position.

What's the difference from what martyr Fahmideh done to what soldiers have done in wars for millenia, for example kamikaze Japanese soldiers. He was fighting an enemy and he took his own life in order to disable an enemy tank. Now the real inspiration for Saudi suicide bombers is Islamic Jihad during the Lebanese Civil War in 1983, from there on in Al-Qaeda and other Saudis/Saudi inspired organizations have used suicide bombings to terrorise civilian populations around the globe. I hope you are able to tell the difference between an enemy fighter and innocent civilians btw.

Also I have seen you personally cheering on Al-Qaeda terrorists in this forum like your "you read what you sow" comment in the other thread. Anyway it is not important even if you condemn your fellow countrymen publicly whilst you continue to finance their terrorist activities privately.

I do think that you don't know the difference between " cheering " & " analyzing "

Here is what I said on that thread
15 Iranis liquidated in Iraq

P.S.

The saying goes " you reap what you sow " not read .-.
 
Is that supposed to be a comeback? I don't care if they where Shia or not, they where Arabs and not Iranian.

No, they saw injustice in the way Amal was treated among the Lebanese, Palestinians. They were Arabs.

Before the suicide bombing took place, the Western-Israeli backed South Lebanon Army massacred many Palestinians and Lebanese. The only way to avenge was to retaliate by the only thing they could have - which was suicide bombing -

Later, Hezbollah emerged from Amal movement, and was financially, militarily backed by Iran - despite the fact that the Iranians were at war with Iraq, they manage to support Hezbollah effectively.


Is that supposed to be a comeback? I don't care if they where Shia or not, they where Arabs and not Iranian.



My bad, typo. :argh:

It is okay, I was a lil bit upset about " cheering " for death to these poor civilians, that's all.
 

Back
Top Bottom