What's new

Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal.

In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran. To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom’s air defences will return to full alert.

“The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to pass over and they will look the other way,” said a US defence source in the area. “They have already done tests to make sure their own jets aren’t scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been done with the agreement of the [US] State Department.”

Sources in Saudi Arabia say it is common knowledge within defence circles in the kingdom that an arrangement is in place if Israel decides to launch the raid. Despite the tension between the two governments, they share a mutual loathing of the regime in Tehran and a common fear of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “We all know this. We will let them [the Israelis] through and see nothing,” said one.

The four main targets for any raid on Iran would be the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Qom, the gas storage development at Isfahan and the heavy-water reactor at Arak. Secondary targets include the lightwater reactor at Bushehr, which could produce weapons-grade plutonium when complete.

The targets lie as far as 1,400 miles (2,250km) from Israel; the outer limits of their bombers’ range, even with aerial refuelling. An open corridor across northern Saudi Arabia would significantly shorten the distance. An airstrike would involve multiple waves of bombers, possibly crossing Jordan, northern Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Aircraft attacking Bushehr, on the Gulf coast, could swing beneath Kuwait to strike from the southwest.

Passing over Iraq would require at least tacit agreement to the raid from Washington. So far, the Obama Administration has refused to give its approval as it pursues a diplomatic solution to curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Military analysts say Israel has held back only because of this failure to secure consensus from America and Arab states. Military analysts doubt that an airstrike alone would be sufficient to knock out the key nuclear facilities, which are heavily fortified and deep underground or within mountains. However, if the latest sanctions prove ineffective the pressure from the Israelis on Washington to approve military action will intensify. Iran vowed to continue enriching uranium after the UN Security Council imposed its toughest sanctions yet in an effort to halt the Islamic Republic’s nuclear programme, which Tehran claims is intended for civil energy purposes only. President Ahmadinejad has described the UN resolution as “a used handkerchief, which should be thrown in the dustbin”.

Israeli officials refused to comment yesterday on details for a raid on Iran, which the Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has refused to rule out. Questioned on the option of a Saudi flight path for Israeli bombers, Aharaon Zeevi Farkash, who headed military intelligence until 2006 and has been involved in war games simulating a strike on Iran, said: “I know that Saudi Arabia is even more afraid than Israel of an Iranian nuclear capacity.”

In 2007 Israel was reported to have used Turkish air space to attack a suspected nuclear reactor being built by Iran’s main regional ally, Syria. Although Turkey publicly protested against the “violation” of its air space, it is thought to have turned a blind eye in what many saw as a dry run for a strike on Iran’s far more substantial — and better-defended — nuclear sites.

Israeli intelligence experts say that Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are at least as worried as themselves and the West about an Iranian nuclear arsenal.Israel has sent missile-class warships and at least one submarine capable of launching a nuclear warhead through the Suez Canal for deployment in the Red Sea within the past year, as both a warning to Iran and in anticipation of a possible strike. Israeli newspapers reported last year that high-ranking officials, including the former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, have met their Saudi Arabian counterparts to discuss the Iranian issue. It was also reported that Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, met Saudi intelligence officials last year to gain assurances that Riyadh would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets violating Saudi airspace during the bombing run. Both governments have denied the reports.

Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites - Times Online
 
1276307922707.jpg
 
I didn't know the Arab nations feared Iran to the point of helping Israel. I still don't see how the F-16s would be able to hit Iran's sites they would have to refuel. Will this be done over Saudi Arabia also ?

This confirms how spineless they are.
 
What source of news are we believing here and getting worked up about... a UK newspaper?

According to the BBC, Lahore fell to the Indian Army in 1965. Didn't you know?
 
Looks like saudi are brain dead. I think it is disaster for them in long term.
 
Saudi Arabia has sold out Zionists. I think the Saudis and their Wahabi clique will now lose their support in Pakistan. I think Pakistan should support Iran in any conflit with US and/or Israel.
 
I dont know why this news is so surprising to every one here... S.Arabia always sees Iran as it's challenger in the otherwise submissive Arab world and would never ever want a powerful Iran in it's neighborhood. That said.. religion and sect are only just the means to attain it's political goal..
 
^^ Well, for one, Saudi Arabia would have to be absolutely brain dead stupid to do something like this. Everyone in the region and around the world would know if this actually occured. If it's been printed in the press, don't you think the Iranians would know? And so now in addition to having numerous Al-qaeda and Ikhwan types running around gunning for them for "selling out to the Americans", the Saudis will also invite the ire of the Shiites in their northern regions, Iranian funded covert ops, trouble with groups in Yemen which Saudi Arabia already associates Iran with as well as a number of additional fronts Iran would be obliged to open in places like Sudan, where Iran and Saudi Arabia are both attempting to develop good relations with the incumbent government.

All of this, of course, pales in comparison to the internal strife such an act will create within Saudi Arabia and how much legitimacy it would rob them of across the muslim world.

Forget about whether this is true, or possible, or whether the UK news source can be trusted given that the US and UK are engaged in a media war against Iran, any balanced analysis of consequences for Saudi Arabia would lead you to the conclusion that this story is complete nonsense.

The western intelligence assessment is that even if Israel were to attack Iran, and even if such an attack were succesful, the most this would do is delay Iran's plans to acquire nuclear weapons. Also, it would be even more incented to attempt to obtain these weapons in the near term, on the international black market - who knows - via rogue Russian Scientists, from missing "inventory" dating back to Soviet stockpiles, from North Korea or elsewhere. It would also make Iran desperate and probably more prone to creating initial, crude "dirty" bombs. And since the gloves would be off, a number of consequences could result in the ME, for Israel and others.

It's just an unbelievable scenario which assumes that the Saudis lack a brain. I don't think this is the case. What is the more likely explanation for this article is that it has been "leaked" (aka planted) as yet another salvo in the media war and pressure tactics in use against Iran. They have been subjected to this sort of ridiculous propaganda for 30 years so they're pretty used to it by now. I don't think this matters or is worth much attention.
 
^^ Well, for one, Saudi Arabia would have to be absolutely brain dead stupid to do something like this. Everyone in the region and around the world would know if this actually occured. If it's been printed in the press, don't you think the Iranians would know? And so now in addition to having numerous Al-qaeda and Ikhwan types running around gunning for them for "selling out to the Americans", the Saudis will also invite the ire of the Shiites in their northern regions, Iranian funded covert ops, trouble with groups in Yemen which Saudi Arabia already associates Iran with as well as a number of additional fronts Iran would be obliged to open in places like Sudan, where Iran and Saudi Arabia are both attempting to develop good relations with the incumbent government.

All of this, of course, pales in comparison to the internal strife such an act will create within Saudi Arabia and how much legitimacy it would rob them of across the muslim world.

Forget about whether this is true, or possible, or whether the UK news source can be trusted given that the US and UK are engaged in a media war against Iran, any balanced analysis of consequences for Saudi Arabia would lead you to the conclusion that this story is complete nonsense.

The western intelligence assessment is that even if Israel were to attack Iran, and even if such an attack were succesful, the most this would do is delay Iran's plans to acquire nuclear weapons. Also, it would be even more incented to attempt to obtain these weapons in the near term, on the international black market - who knows - via rogue Russian Scientists, from missing "inventory" dating back to Soviet stockpiles, from North Korea or elsewhere. It would also make Iran desperate and probably more prone to creating initial, crude "dirty" bombs. And since the gloves would be off, a number of consequences could result in the ME, for Israel and others.

It's just an unbelievable scenario which assumes that the Saudis lack a brain. I don't think this is the case. What is the more likely explanation for this article is that it has been "leaked" (aka planted) as yet another salvo in the media war and pressure tactics in use against Iran. They have been subjected to this sort of ridiculous propaganda for 30 years so they're pretty used to it by now. I don't think this matters or is worth much attention.

First of all.. Arab people are different from Arab rulers... As long as S.A has a firm grip on the rest of Arab world's rulers ..the rulers of S.A can dare to do what ever they like to.. and I think you are overestimating the Shia backlash on the S.A.. time and again it's been proved that Shia's lack that stomach or should I say that political back up to revolt against Sunni S.A or any body else who are massacring them.. if not we would have seen a Shia AlQaeda long before to avenge theier sectarian cleansing in some parts of the muslim world. And the only Shia power which has "stomach" to challenge the S.A's irrefutable supremacy over the muslim world is Iran and so the S.A's "covert" partnership with the Israel makes its non surprising.. and one more reason that muslims wouldnt revolt against S.A as you think is ..if they didnt object(apart from some minor Alqaeda sponsored resistance) the S.A's association with the Muslim's enemy number one "U.S.A" till now..why would they do now? and all the things that you said about Iran going rouge and getting Nukes some way or the other... Iran would any ways definitely get their nukes even if Israel wouldnt bomb it's nuclear sites..and all this "nuclear for energy needs" is just a ploy to divert the world..

P.S: I'm not against Iran's nuclear program.. am just trying to be rationale with the current events thats all..
 

Back
Top Bottom