What's new

Raziya Sultana of Delhi Sultanate 📜

Great tale and it has many twists like a movie.. The only minor error was that muhammad of Ghor was the one who took Bengal not Tutmish. Also the drawing of the characters is good besides the delhi sultanate is very well recorded including image drawings of the elite and their appearances. The Islamic encyclopedia has been very obsessed with details in regards to their stories since the Imam al-Bukhari era that trend continued for several centuries all the way to the 19-century
 
Last edited:
One thing I have observed since last year, suddenly more and more YouTube content creators in West are making lots of videos related to India. Seems to be a sureshot way to boost viewership and subscription.
 
Last edited:
One thing I have observed since last year, suddenly more and more YouTube content creators in West are making lots of videos related to India. Seems to be a sureshot way to boost viewership and subscription.

This is just not the case and there is way less videos on India compared to other places..
Great tale and it has many twists like a movie.. The only minor error was that muhammad of Ghor was the one who took Bengal not Tutmish. Also the drawing of the characters is good besides the delhi sultanate is very well recorded including image drawings of the elite and their appearances. The Islamic encyclopedia has been very obsessed with details in regards to their stories since the Imam al-Bukhari era that trend continued for several centuries all the way to the 19-century

the way he put everything together and the twists and turns makes it for a good watch
 
muhammad of Ghor was the one who took Bengal not Tutmish

I also think this one is quite good we jump right into 100 years post Muhammad of Ghor's conquest at the battle of Tarain and approx litle over half century post- Raziya Sultana's death..

Muhammad Of Ghor - 1192

Raziya - 1240

In the this video we jump right into 1296 (Explosive characters will make appearance here)


 
Last edited:
I also think this one is quite good we jump right into 100 years post Muhammad of Ghor's conquest at the battle of Tarain and approx litle over half century post- Raziya Sultana's death..

Muhammad Of Ghor - 1192

Raziya - 1240

In the this video we jump right into 1296 (Explosive characters will make appearance here)

imho Rama Raya could have survived here because they didn't want to harm him or anything like that they didn't even have ill intentions towards him but he made political mistake along the way and got to rough along the way enforcing a last stand of sort and giving them no choice whatsoever as he was hell-bent on it.


Alot of people think that they just came here by coincidence but it was not by coincidence at all but they were lead here. They followed the passage given by the prophet he spoke about certain areas and he forbid them from certain areas and said some places were a blessing to go..

All-the-countries-Muslims-ruled-at-one-point.png


Example it was said that these who go to the Subcontinent will be forgiven of all there sins and they were obsessed of becoming these who were forgiven hence there was an obsession over that territory and that is why they came to India and the subcontinent to earn heavens favor and the same case with Constantinople it was said these who open it would be best of people etc etc hence there was an obsession over it and many attempts made on that city as everyone sought to become these people whereas Sub-sharan africa and China were told to them to not attack it unless they fight you first and to leave them alone.. Hence they were directed to these places and re-directed from some places if the hadith had switched things they would have gone to these places that were in the hadith..

The muslims were real muslims back then not replica like today there aren't real real muslims today to be honest but cultural muslims who are born into it the difference is huge just via inheritence.. The others they even followed the paths within the hadith like compass it lead them to territories and lands.

It may be controversial but there aren't Muslims today as in real like classical muslims what you see is inheritence muslims or descendants but they aren't real muslims by any definitions as in the true meaning of it
 
Last edited:
Muhammad of Ghor is the father of Pakistan not someone who lived in the 1940s who technically agreed to his lines


We shouldn't draw inspiration from Jinnah but Ghor period we came with him
 
Last edited:
imho Rama Raya could have survived here because they didn't want to harm him or anything like that they didn't even have ill intentions towards him but he made political mistake along the way and got to rough along the way enforcing a last stand of sort and giving them no choice whatsoever as he was hell-bent on it.


Alot of people think that they just came here by coincidence but it was not by coincidence at all but they were lead here. They followed the passage given by the prophet he spoke about certain areas and he forbid them from certain areas and said some places were a blessing to go..

All-the-countries-Muslims-ruled-at-one-point.png


Example it was said that these who go to the Subcontinent will be forgiven of all there sins and they were obsessed of becoming these who were forgiven hence there was an obsession over that territory and that is why they came to India and the subcontinent to earn heavens favor and the same case with Constantinople it was said these who open it would be best of people etc etc hence there was an obsession over it and many attempts made on that city as everyone sought to become these people whereas Sub-sharan africa and China were told to them to not attack it unless they fight you first and to leave them alone.. Hence they were directed to these places and re-directed from some places if the hadith had switched things they would have gone to these places that were in the hadith..

The muslims were real muslims back then not replica like today there aren't real real muslims today to be honest but cultural muslims who are born into it the difference is huge just via inheritence.. The others they even followed the paths within the hadith like compass it lead them to territories and lands.

It may be controversial but there aren't Muslims today as in real like classical muslims what you see is inheritence muslims or descendants but they aren't real muslims by any definitions as in the true meaning of it

Not related to Islam, for them Islam is a political tool. Through out the medeival history horse archer played a key role in dominance and Central Asia has the mastery of it.

These are the same guys who burnt Bagdad and many Arab dominated cities.

China is also subjugated by Khans of mongolia.
 
Not related to Islam, for them Islam is a political tool. Through out the medeival history horse archer played a key role in dominance and Central Asia has the mastery of it.

These are the same guys who burnt Bagdad and many Arab dominated cities.

China is also subjugated by Khans of mongolia.

The 5 Deccans sultanates weren't turks besides since the Ghorid period they were a unified element not just one entity just because the narrator says doesn't mean it is like that.. There were plenty of Tajiks, Afghans, Punjabis etc etc in Ghorid and Delhi ranks thru out the centuries example even the conqueror of the south Malik Kafur was Marathi and he even rose all the way to Sultan status for 1 year period he was the ruler of the sultanate when Alauddin Khilji died
 
The 5 Deccans sultanates weren't turks besides since the Ghorid period they were a unified element not just one entity just because the narrator says doesn't mean it is like that.. There were plenty of Tajiks, Afghans, Punjabis etc etc in Ghorid and Delhi ranks thru out the centuries example even the conqueror of the south Malik Kafur was Marathi and he even rose all the way to Sultan status for 1 year period he was the ruler of the sultanate when Alauddin Khilji died

These sultans came with Ghorid invasion. Related to c asia.
 
These sultans came with Ghorid invasion. Related to c asia.

Not all of them are related to C Asia like the Sur dynasty or Bengal sultanate including the 5 deccan sultanates or Shah Abdali, Myscore and Tipu Sultanate etc etc and many more
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom