What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
He can advise if asked by NS but it's illegal for him to tell NS.

Gen Kakar have done that in the past with Mr GodFather.

Panamagate (minority) judgement leaves Ishaq Dar in tight spot

In Panamagate case verdict, the two judges including Justice Asif Saeed Khosa have directed National Accountability Bureau to proceed against finance minister in Hudabiya Papers Mills case, in which Ishaq Dar had been accused of laundering money.

“The National Accountability Bureau is directed to proceed against Muhammad Ishaq Dar in connection with (Hudabiya) Reference wherein the respondent (Dar) was not an accused person when the reference was quashed by the Lahore High Court”, according to minority judgment of Justice Asif Saeed Khosa and Justice Gulzar Ahmed.

The minority judges’ observations in the case has brought the 26-year old case back to the limelight, which was also one of the main points pleaded by the petitioners for the disqualification of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

However, Ali Zafar, former President Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan said that the minority judgment remains academic in nature and has no legal binding. Yet, the observations made in the minority judgment can be used for discussion purposes.

In Hudabiya Papers Mills case, Ishaq Dar had made a confessional statement disclosing details of money laundering to the tune of $14.9 million on part of Nawaz Sharif and his family. However, later on, Dar claimed that the confessional statement had been taken by using force against him.

Dar’s lawyer had submitted before the apex court that it would be unjust and unfair to reopen the matter after a lapse of more than 16 years when the Lahore High Court had quashed the case.

In the Panamagate verdict Dar has been called as a “Samdhi” of respondent No. 1 (Nawaz Sharif) five times. His name also appeared as Respondent No 10 in the verdict for 30 times.

The minority judgment noted that in the last two and a half decades there had been a constant murmur nationally as well internationally about Nawaz indulging in corruption, corrupt practices and money laundering with the active assistance and involvement of Ishaq Dar. The two judges further observed that some specified properties in London, United Kingdom had been identified as having been acquired by Nawaz Sharif through ill-gotten or laundered money.

The minority judgment cited Imran Khan’s lawyer, Naeem Bokhari’s reference to a confessional statement made by Dar under section 164, before a Magistrate First Class, Lahore on April 25, 2000. Dar had confessed to laundering money for the benefit of Nawaz Sharif and others and on the basis of that the Reference had been filed by the NAB before an Accountability Court against Hudabiya Paper Mills, three Sharif brothers, Ishaq Dar and others.

However, later on a division bench of the Lahore High Court quashed the reference in March 2014. After quashing of the reference judges of the High Court had disagreed with each other over the issue of reinvestigation of the case by the NAB and thus the said aspect of the case was referred to a referee judge who held that the case could not be allowed to be reinvestigated.

Chairman NAB did not challenge that judgment of the Lahore High Court before the Supreme Court through any petition or appeal.

The minority judges noted that Ishaq Dar was not arrayed as an accused person in the final reference filed by NAB and his status in that reference was merely that of a prosecution witness when the Lahore High Court quashed this reference against the accused persons and reinvestigation was barred.

“Quashing reference by the High Court did not entail respondent No. 10 (Dar) acquittal or smothering of any possibility of his trial on the said charges at any subsequent stage”, according to the minority judges.

The judges further observed that upon quashing of the reference and setting aside of the confessional statement of Dar by the high court, the pardon tendered to Dar by chairman NAB has also ended.

“It is, therefore, declared that after restoration of respondent No. 10’s (Dar) status as an accused person in that case reinvestigation to his extent and filing of a reference against him can be undertaken or resorted to by the National Accountability Bureau”, according to the judges.

FBR grilling

The apex court also did not accept FBR’s plea that it proactively moved against persons named in the Panama Papers. The FBR took the stance that it had taken immediate cognizance of the matter and issued notices to all those named in the Panama Papers.

This, “immediate cognizance” translated into halfhearted issuance of some notices six months after the information came into public domain which speaks volumes about the lethargy, carelessness and inefficiency displayed by the premium tax and financial watchdog of the country, according to the judgment.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1389248/panama-judgment-leaves-ishaq-dar-tight-spot/

Main ne socha ke hum minority verdict parh parh kar hi khush ho lein.. Ab tu yehi karsaktay hain hum.. I think the majority verdict doesnt talk abt Ishaq dar, hudaibya case at all.. I am surprised, the majority verdict doesnt talk abt Ishaq Dar, at all??? Ye majority judges, ne aakhir kiya kya hai???? Woh karna kia chahtay thay, akhir?

@PakSword @Verve @Guvera



Bas ye law, legality aur constituition hi le dooba, is mulk ko

Majority Judges ne apna future bananay ki aik bay saropa koshish ki hai
 
Majority judgement only saves MNS and his family.. I am still reading it.. It is really a clean chit for MNS..

.

Like really .... They havent mentioned anything abt hudaibya mills case and ishaq dar? Why? What were they thinking while writing the verdict?

If we see Justice Khosa's (and Gulzar's) judgment... Unhon ne mukhtalif tareeqon se sab ko phansa diya hai... Kisi ko nahi chora

Disqualifying the pm
Phir kaha ke NAB, PM ki saari properties..other than 4 flats tooo.. Sab ko investigate kar ke trial court le kar jaye.. And i think..unhon ne ye bhi kaha ke dekhein..ke bachon ki properties benami tu nahi hain?Chairman NAB ki saari powers le lein wapis..
Ye bhi kaha ke PM ke bachon ki jo saari properties hain..un main se kahin prove nahi hua ke unhon ne apnay paison se banayi hain..
Ishaq dar ka pardon khatam kar diya... Aur kaha ke inke khilaf investigations dobara shuru karein

Sab ko ragaid diya..is judgment main..

Lekin majority judges ..ishaq dar aur hudaibya case ko bhool hi gaye?

Gen Kakar have done that in the past with Mr GodFather.

Gen Bajwa is not Gen Kakar
 
Panamagate (minority) judgement leaves Ishaq Dar in tight spot

In Panamagate case verdict, the two judges including Justice Asif Saeed Khosa have directed National Accountability Bureau to proceed against finance minister in Hudabiya Papers Mills case, in which Ishaq Dar had been accused of laundering money.

“The National Accountability Bureau is directed to proceed against Muhammad Ishaq Dar in connection with (Hudabiya) Reference wherein the respondent (Dar) was not an accused person when the reference was quashed by the Lahore High Court”, according to minority judgment of Justice Asif Saeed Khosa and Justice Gulzar Ahmed.

The minority judges’ observations in the case has brought the 26-year old case back to the limelight, which was also one of the main points pleaded by the petitioners for the disqualification of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

However, Ali Zafar, former President Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan said that the minority judgment remains academic in nature and has no legal binding. Yet, the observations made in the minority judgment can be used for discussion purposes.

In Hudabiya Papers Mills case, Ishaq Dar had made a confessional statement disclosing details of money laundering to the tune of $14.9 million on part of Nawaz Sharif and his family. However, later on, Dar claimed that the confessional statement had been taken by using force against him.

Dar’s lawyer had submitted before the apex court that it would be unjust and unfair to reopen the matter after a lapse of more than 16 years when the Lahore High Court had quashed the case.

In the Panamagate verdict Dar has been called as a “Samdhi” of respondent No. 1 (Nawaz Sharif) five times. His name also appeared as Respondent No 10 in the verdict for 30 times.

The minority judgment noted that in the last two and a half decades there had been a constant murmur nationally as well internationally about Nawaz indulging in corruption, corrupt practices and money laundering with the active assistance and involvement of Ishaq Dar. The two judges further observed that some specified properties in London, United Kingdom had been identified as having been acquired by Nawaz Sharif through ill-gotten or laundered money.

The minority judgment cited Imran Khan’s lawyer, Naeem Bokhari’s reference to a confessional statement made by Dar under section 164, before a Magistrate First Class, Lahore on April 25, 2000. Dar had confessed to laundering money for the benefit of Nawaz Sharif and others and on the basis of that the Reference had been filed by the NAB before an Accountability Court against Hudabiya Paper Mills, three Sharif brothers, Ishaq Dar and others.

However, later on a division bench of the Lahore High Court quashed the reference in March 2014. After quashing of the reference judges of the High Court had disagreed with each other over the issue of reinvestigation of the case by the NAB and thus the said aspect of the case was referred to a referee judge who held that the case could not be allowed to be reinvestigated.

Chairman NAB did not challenge that judgment of the Lahore High Court before the Supreme Court through any petition or appeal.

The minority judges noted that Ishaq Dar was not arrayed as an accused person in the final reference filed by NAB and his status in that reference was merely that of a prosecution witness when the Lahore High Court quashed this reference against the accused persons and reinvestigation was barred.

“Quashing reference by the High Court did not entail respondent No. 10 (Dar) acquittal or smothering of any possibility of his trial on the said charges at any subsequent stage”, according to the minority judges.

The judges further observed that upon quashing of the reference and setting aside of the confessional statement of Dar by the high court, the pardon tendered to Dar by chairman NAB has also ended.

“It is, therefore, declared that after restoration of respondent No. 10’s (Dar) status as an accused person in that case reinvestigation to his extent and filing of a reference against him can be undertaken or resorted to by the National Accountability Bureau”, according to the judges.

FBR grilling

The apex court also did not accept FBR’s plea that it proactively moved against persons named in the Panama Papers. The FBR took the stance that it had taken immediate cognizance of the matter and issued notices to all those named in the Panama Papers.

This, “immediate cognizance” translated into halfhearted issuance of some notices six months after the information came into public domain which speaks volumes about the lethargy, carelessness and inefficiency displayed by the premium tax and financial watchdog of the country, according to the judgment.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1389248/panama-judgment-leaves-ishaq-dar-tight-spot/

Main ne socha ke hum minority verdict parh parh kar hi khush ho lein.. Ab tu yehi karsaktay hain hum.. I think the majority verdict doesnt talk abt Ishaq dar, hudaibya case at all.. I am surprised, the majority verdict doesnt talk abt Ishaq Dar, at all??? Ye majority judges, ne aakhir kiya kya hai???? Woh karna kia chahtay thay, akhir?

@PakSword @Verve @Guvera



Bas ye law, legality aur constituition hi le dooba, is mulk ko
Jee. Who uss NaB koo refer ker rehain who gave dick to khosa and the compny. He said himself. Nab is useless incompetent . So the JIT will be also useless. Khudd kuch ker nien sakty tu ghar jhoo baba.

Like really .... They havent mentioned anything abt hudaibya mills case and ishaq dar? Why? What were they thinking while writing the verdict?

If we see Justice Khosa's (and Gulzar's) judgment... Unhon ne mukhtalif tareeqon se sab ko phansa diya hai... Kisi ko nahi chora

Disqualifying the pm
Phir kaha ke NAB, PM ki saari properties..other than 4 flats tooo.. Sab ko investigate kar ke trial court le kar jaye.. And i think..unhon ne ye bhi kaha ke dekhein..ke bachon ki properties benami tu nahi hain?Chairman NAB ki saari powers le lein wapis..
Ye bhi kaha ke PM ke bachon ki jo saari properties hain..un main se kahin prove nahi hua ke unhon ne apnay paison se banayi hain..
Ishaq dar ka pardon khatam kar diya... Aur kaha ke inke khilaf investigations dobara shuru karein

Sab ko ragaid diya..is judgment main..

Lekin majority judges ..ishaq dar aur hudaibya case ko bhool hi gaye?



Gen Bajwa is not Gen Kakar
All judges read n seen same evidence. Wrote mostly same remarks. But 3 judges reached to utmost illogic conclusion. That why uzmat said decision will be rememberd for 20 trs
BECAUSE OF THE MESS THEY CREATED WITH THE VERDICT
 
Gen Bajwa is not Gen Kakar
Yeh tu waqt batayega, increasing unstability, chaos and anarchy in the country will force either Bajwa to ask GodFather to step down or the Godfather himself will do that.
 
Jee. Who uss NaB koo refer ker rehain who gave dick to khosa and the compny. He said himself. Nab is useless incompetent . So the JIT will be also useless. Khudd kuch ker nien sakty tu ghar jhoo baba.

Chairman NAB se saari powers wapis le lein unhon ne...on cases against PM...He didnt order against Chairman NAB to supreme judicial council, because he himself is member of supreme judicial council....conflict ki wajah se nahi kia.... But IK can still file for reference against Chairman NAB.. Justice Khosa doesnt stop anyone from doing so..unlike Pakora judge, who in a way advised EC ke agar aap ke pass disqualification ki petition aaye tu aap reject kardein, 90 days ka bahana banaa kar
 
Ok then How many will agree with me on COAS Bajwa asking Mr Godfather to step down till JIT complete its work i.e for 60 days ?
First he needs to grow a mustache . Then maybe his order......

Mr. Bajwa made it clear to everyone, including IK and MNS, that the judgment (whatever it was) will be implemented, by hook or by crook..
Yes because bajwa was send a copy of judjement 1 month ago. U understand the purpose of bajwa .khan meeting now. Bajwa is on the other team... pml.n

Now as the news are coming that Mr. Imran Khan is not agreeing on a JIT while MNS holding public office, Mr. Bajwa itni bajaein ge Mr. Imran Khan ki, ke Mr. Imran Khan shayad politics hi bhool jaein..
 
Bas ye law, legality aur constituition hi le dooba, is mulk ko

Martial law is not the answer either, it is counter productive and gives justification to these dynasties. Rule of law, however slow the implementation, is the answer and that is already leading to the collapse of the system.

There's no quick fix. Wait and see.
 
Martial law is not the answer either, it is counter productive and gives justification to these dynasties. Rule of law, however slow the implementation, is the answer and that is already leading to the collapse of the system.

There's no quick fix. Wait and see.


Wonderful statement. I agree in every language i know.
We are now witnessing the 50 shades of Justice.
 
Farah i use to call NS Al Capone IK call him Pablo Escobar now SC called him God father WOW .He is done will kick out down the road total wracked .NS lost it .

I really hope so too.. Lekin honestly ziada umeed nahi hai.. There are very few judges like Justice Khosa and Justice Gulzar in our judiciary...mostly judges woh hain, jo araam se Dr Asim, Sharjeel Memon aur Ayan Ali ko bail de detay hian, aur Sharif fanily ko bhi bailout package dete hain..taakay ye log voctory signs bana kar humara mazaaq uraa sakein.. Jab aisy halaat honge mulk main...tu mob justice kaisy nahi hoga...is mulk main?
 
Army has already given their statement in this matter. Army will not interfere in any sense no matter what. SC has tried to get MI and ISI involved in this verdict but Army will not move an inch because it is not their job nor they can afford to do that at this moment in time.
And i supposr its not there country nor its people. Thatswhy they dont want to move an inch. Because bajwa is in pocket of nawaz sharif.

What did I tell you guys yesterday???

Any doubt left now? The bitch was groomed by international establishment to carry on the evil work of her father and now our own establishment, that we feel so proud of, acting like a good pet dogs of their international masters, are following the script to the page.

Bajwa and Naveed Mukhar are taking us back to the status quo.


https://www.dawn.com/news/1328328/apex-court-clears-maryam-in-panama-papers-case


Apex court clears Maryam in Panama Papers case
Right on bro 100%. Why did we loose all the war,s... just because of use less army
 
Gadari party is cashing in on hard on the current situation.

At the same time gadari is worried as F**K because of Uzair, the panic can clearly be seen on his face.
 
Of course a view point which may be correct. My hope is based on the fact that the next bench does not have to hear the case they have to assess information collected by JIT against the questions raised by current ordering bench. I am going through the judgement (have reached approximately 50 pages). They have outlined the questions JIT has to ask. They cannot deviate from those questions. The majority decision says that if MNS is unable to provide money trail or for that matter answers to those questions and disqualification reference is to be filled. This means that they have already given a decision if MNS is unable to provide proof of money trail (just not satisfactory answer).

On the other hand there will be a lot of commotion, trailer was already there in NA. So lets keep the fingers crossed. What I foresee is a lot of arson and violence in coming days.
Nawaz sharif dont give a shit about supreme court. Nor army. Nor pakistani barhani voter. Hes the king.. hail to the king.
 
And i supposr its not there country nor its people. Thatswhy they dont want to move an inch. Because bajwa is in pocket of nawaz sharif.


Right on bro 100%. Why did we loose all the war,s... just because of use less army


Army is an institution of Pakistan and not for internal political circus.
And please stop maligning Pakistan Army with such baseless accusations.

Please do not start with this again so i will keep the answer short and limited - Pakistan Army never lost a war with external forces.

Eat a baguette will you and just stop spreading hate and hopelessness.
 
Army is an institution of Pakistan and not for internal political circus.
And please stop maligning Pakistan Army with such baseless accusations.

Please do not start with this again so i will keep the answer short and limited - Pakistan Army never lost a war with external forces.

Eat a baguette will you and just stop spreading hate and hopelessness.
I suppose gen naizi was surrendring on behalf of nepal 80.000 plus fauji

I suppose gen naizi was surrendring on behalf of nepal 80.000 plus fauji
U r a fauji . Thats why u r annoyed
 
I suppose gen naizi was surrendring on behalf of nepal 80.000 plus fauji

Do not derail the topic please. If you have something constructive to say please do. The nation is sick and tired of people who want to live in the past. This is the exact reason why no one cares for the general public because everyone has a story to tell.

P.S. General Niazi was never ordered to surrender but only to halt fire. Either way you will never comprehend that a state constitutes not just only the Land mass but also the ingenious population.


I suppose gen naizi was surrendring on behalf of nepal 80.000 plus fauji


U r a fauji . Thats why u r annoyed


Here is a classical example of what is wrong with our society. Apparently only a Fauji will be annoyed by such statements while a civilian will play the blame game. This divide is intentional to keep the rich and the feudal happy.
Civilians never understood what is an institution and what loyalty is.
I will report you for utter disrespect to 90000 souls (soldiers) next time i see you marauding your anti Pakistan hysteria.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom