Pakistan removes third of its Army along Indian borders

[CAPTAIN AMERICA]

Where did u get this figure, read my post above that will answer ur question about how it can be done saving lots of young lives.

Heres where I got the figures Pakistan Assessment 2010

To be honest I dont understand what you said above, but will read it a few more times.

 

[faisaljaffery]

no problem we have our nukes to take care for indian army in case of any agression

 

[faisaljaffery]

without Pakistan support Nato cannto stay even for a week in Afghanistan... thats Pak which supports USA and Britian to fight the war against terror other wise they willl instantly lose the war

 

[Bhim]

no problem we have our nukes to take care for indian army in case of any agression

Again frustration at its heights. If no way out, just Nuke it.
If your army is out of Eastern borders, then they have gone with a purpose, and not on a holiday. If there is any one who should be nuked, are these Terrorists hiding in those AF PAK border areas.
Give it a try and see the amazing results.
After that both of us can start our good old ways again.

 

[Awesome]

A war would take some time to build up. Unlike in India, Pakistan's deployment is much simpler as we have less ground to cover.

Currently the boys are needed elsewhere where we anyway believe an Indian front exists.

 

[Awesome]

http://www.defence.pk/forums/forum-information/41367-troll-fatwas-2.html#post920887

 

[Old School]

no problem we have our nukes to take care for indian army in case of any agression

Nukes are not to be used on the battlefield scenario although there are small tactical nukes for specific operations but those are designed for remote and specific targets. Nukes are merely used as deterrence under strategic arsenal. India also has nukes and a first strike from Pakistan will trigger inevitable response from the Indian side.
In plain English , certain suicide is the other word which can be used if one Nuke-nation use Nuke against another Nuke-nation. Using nuke at one's border can only come to the mind of a lunatic.

 

[CAPTAIN AMERICA]

without Pakistan support Nato cannto stay even for a week in Afghanistan... thats Pak which supports USA and Britian to fight the war against terror other wise they willl instantly lose the war

If the USA leaves Afghanistan then the Taliban will turn on Pakistan, the Taliban are an agressive ideaology that can not live side by side with any one else.

 

[mjnaushad]

Lets think about this, terrorist have killed 25,000 Pakistanis in the last 7 years, India has killed how what 0 ? Pakistanis in the last 7 years, so where should the troops be.. is that a real hard question.

How many Americans did Iraq killed since 1991 to 2003?. Then why are your forces holding ground in Iraq. Right now we need troops on WOT but Eastern border remains our main priority.

 

[mughaljee]

If the USA leaves Afghanistan then the Taliban will turn on Pakistan, the Taliban are an agressive ideaology that can not live side by side with any one else.

Wrong answer dear,
After usa , we believe the "Cop" duty will be Indian's & then the Taliban no need to rush back Pakistan. They will have be enough lines to fight with "Cops" in his own country like they doing with USA right now.

 

[CAPTAIN AMERICA]

Wrong answer dear,
After usa , we believe the "Cop" duty will be Indian's & then the Taliban no need to rush back Pakistan. They will have be enough lines to fight with "Cops" in his own country like they doing with USA right now.

Well Dear Lets think about it. According to this article Observer human rights index | Special reports | guardian.co.uk Pakistan is listed as one of the 20 countries with the worst Human Rights Record in the World, India is not even on the list, and what lists it is on India has much higher ranking then Pakistan. So does it not stand to reason that Afghanstan and Kashmir would better off if they were occupied India then Pakistan.

 

[mjnaushad]

Well Dear Lets think about it. According to this article Observer human rights index | Special reports | guardian.co.uk Pakistan is listed as one of the 20 countries with the worst Human Rights Record in the World, India is not even on the list, and what lists it is on India has much higher ranking then Pakistan. So does it not stand to reason that Afghanstan and Kashmir would better off if they were occupied India then Pakistan.

Yea....we saw those human rights in Gujrat roits, Sikhroits, Suppressing Kashmiri voices with guns.....I can put a list of human right abuses videos here but dont want to start a dirt fight...

 

[CAPTAIN AMERICA]

Yea....we saw those human rights in Gujrat roits, Sikhroits, Suppressing Kashmiri voices with guns.....I can put a list of human right abuses videos here but dont want to start a dirt fight...

If you dont mind I will leave it up to world wide organizations to reach conclusions about who has the worlds worst human rights record. According to this report Pakistan has a worst human rights record even then Israel.

 

[TaimiKhan]

If you dont mind I will leave it up to world wide organizations to reach conclusions about who has the worlds worst human rights record. According to this report Pakistan has a worst human rights record even then Israel.

Yeah the same UN kind of world organization which gave permission to US to wage war on Iraq based on false information provided by US and its allies.

Same US who speaks about others to look after their human rights record, but when it comes to the KSA, it shuts up as KSA is an ally and buys billions $$$s worth of weapons and supplies oil.

Hypocrisy at its best.

 

[CAPTAIN AMERICA]

Yeah the same UN kind of world organization which gave permission to US to wage war on Iraq based on false information provided by US and its allies.

Same US who speaks about others to look after their human rights record, but when it comes to the KSA, it shuts up as KSA is an ally and buys billions $$$s worth of weapons and supplies oil.

Hypocrisy at its best.

I expect its more like things like Blasphemy Laws
In Pakistan, 1.5% of the population are Christian. Pakistani law mandates that any "blasphemies" of the Quran are to be met with punishment such as prison or excution. Like Ayub Masih, a Christian, was convicted of blasphemy and sentenced to death in 1998. He was accused by a neighbor of stating that he supported British writer, Salman Rushdie, author of The Satanic Verses. Interesting isnt it ,, you say you think Salman Rushdie was right an off goes your head. Later it was found out it was just a neighbor wanting his land.