What's new

Pakistan falling behind India, BD on multidimensional poverty: Source OPHI

you must have data to back your claim.

International organization "Emerging Markets" has declared Pakistan the best infrastructure development country of South Asia.



Pakistan's Ambassador to the United States Jalil Abbas Jilani received an award in this regard on behalf of Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal at a ceremony in Washington.

The award has been given to Pakistan for launching various mega projects, including China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Liquefied Natural Gas Pipeline, Lahore to Karachi railway line, power generation plants and industrial zones.

The organization has also described Pakistan as an attractive country for investment in energy and transport projects under infrastructure development.

http://www.radio.gov.pk/09-Oct-2016...rastructure-development-country-of-south-asia

Pakistan declared as ‘Best Country for Infrastructure Development’ by South Asia
Untitled-1-8.jpg

WASHINGTON: Pakistan has been recognized as the ‘Best Country for Infrastructure Development in South Asia’ by the “Emerging Markets”, a publication of the IMF/World Bank Annual Meeting 2016, in recognition of its massive progress in the field.

A press release issued on Monday,”The country Award was received by Ambassador of Pakistan to the United States, Jalil Abbas Jilani on behalf of Ahsan Iqbal, Minister for Planning, Development and Reforms, at a ceremony here during the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings.”

Speaking on the occasion, Ambassador Jilani thanked the Emerging Markets for recognizing and supporting Pakistan’s development trajectory that was inextricably linked to peace in the region. He highlighted that Pakistan was committed to regional connectivity and share the fruits of prosperity with all neighbors.

He expressed confidence that the Government’s people-centric development policies and regional economic cooperation would usher in a new era of prosperity.

Hon. Professor Ahsan Iqbal, the Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Reform spearheads the infrastructure development in the country.

The ongoing major projects include building of new thermal power plants, the construction of a 700 km LNG pipeline and the upgrading the Karachi-Lahore railway track to name a few.

The centerpiece of the massive infrastructure development work is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which involves construction of rail and road network, gas pipelines, industrial zones and development of the Gwadar port. CPEC would connect China’s western region to Pakistan and is aimed at revolutionizing the economic progress and enhance regional connectivity.

The award is a unique honor for Pakistan that recognizes the country as one of the most exciting and an important destination as far as infrastructure development is concerned.

Source: APP

http://www.businessplustv.pk/2016/1...for-infrastructure-development-by-south-asia/
 
International organization "Emerging Markets" has declared Pakistan the best infrastructure development country of South Asia.



Pakistan's Ambassador to the United States Jalil Abbas Jilani received an award in this regard on behalf of Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal at a ceremony in Washington.

The award has been given to Pakistan for launching various mega projects, including China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Liquefied Natural Gas Pipeline, Lahore to Karachi railway line, power generation plants and industrial zones.

The organization has also described Pakistan as an attractive country for investment in energy and transport projects under infrastructure development.

http://www.radio.gov.pk/09-Oct-2016...rastructure-development-country-of-south-asia

Pakistan declared as ‘Best Country for Infrastructure Development’ by South Asia
Untitled-1-8.jpg

WASHINGTON: Pakistan has been recognized as the ‘Best Country for Infrastructure Development in South Asia’ by the “Emerging Markets”, a publication of the IMF/World Bank Annual Meeting 2016, in recognition of its massive progress in the field.

A press release issued on Monday,”The country Award was received by Ambassador of Pakistan to the United States, Jalil Abbas Jilani on behalf of Ahsan Iqbal, Minister for Planning, Development and Reforms, at a ceremony here during the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings.”

Speaking on the occasion, Ambassador Jilani thanked the Emerging Markets for recognizing and supporting Pakistan’s development trajectory that was inextricably linked to peace in the region. He highlighted that Pakistan was committed to regional connectivity and share the fruits of prosperity with all neighbors.

He expressed confidence that the Government’s people-centric development policies and regional economic cooperation would usher in a new era of prosperity.

Hon. Professor Ahsan Iqbal, the Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Reform spearheads the infrastructure development in the country.

The ongoing major projects include building of new thermal power plants, the construction of a 700 km LNG pipeline and the upgrading the Karachi-Lahore railway track to name a few.

The centerpiece of the massive infrastructure development work is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which involves construction of rail and road network, gas pipelines, industrial zones and development of the Gwadar port. CPEC would connect China’s western region to Pakistan and is aimed at revolutionizing the economic progress and enhance regional connectivity.

The award is a unique honor for Pakistan that recognizes the country as one of the most exciting and an important destination as far as infrastructure development is concerned.

Source: APP

http://www.businessplustv.pk/2016/1...for-infrastructure-development-by-south-asia/

you are giving me pakistani source? Don't you think a more neutral source would have been better?

@Max



Are we better than India?
11.jpg

Muhammad Umer Saleem Bhatti
clock.png
TFT Issue: 17 Oct 2014

Self esteem is important, but so is rational self-reflection


tft-36-p-1-f.jpg





There is a perception among our countrymen these days, a rousingly ethnocentric one, that Pakistan is better than India by almost all means. We think our military is better than India’s, our people are more beautiful than Indians, Pakistanis are unbiased and Indians are discriminatory, Pakistanis are more hospitable than Indians, and if there would be a war, Pakistan would wipe India out.

But, the basic question is, do these things really matter in an ever evolving and progressing world, especially when the war front has been switched from the military supremacy to the economic supremacy? Economic independence and development is the name of the game in today’s world.

Most Pakistanis think high of themselves and their country vis a vis India because a person’s or nation’s self esteem demands it. Indians, or people from any other country, would think the same. But let us judge our perception on the anvil of neutrality, impartiality and objectiveness to reach a definitive conclusion about its validity.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has released its Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) 2014-15 for 144 economies around the world. The different aspects of competitiveness are captured in twelve pillars that compose the Global development Index (GCI). Out of 144 economies, 1 is the best and 144 is the worst ranking. There is first an overall ranking for a country, then a ranking for each pillar of GCI, and then sub-rankings of different sub-pillars.

The twelve pillars of GCI include institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomic environment, health and primary education, higher education and training, goods market efficiency, labour market efficiency, financial market development, technological readiness, market size, business sophistication and innovation.

The overall ranking for Pakistan is 129 out of 144. The same for India is 71. For institutions, Pakistan stands at 123 and India at 70. Pakistan ranks at 119 for the pillar of infrastructure and India at 87. For the sub-pillar of quality of roads infrastructure, Pakistan is at 75 and India is at 76 and for the sub-pillar of quality of railroad infrastructure, Pakistan and India are at 72 and 27 respectively. For port-infrastructure, Pakistan is at 59 and India at 76.


Macroeconomic Environment pillar’s ranking for Pakistan is 137 and same for India is 101. For the sub-pillar of Gross National Savings as a percentage of GDP, India stands way ahead of Pakistan with a ranking of 18 in comparison to Pakistan’s 120. For annual inflation percentage change, India is doing worse than Pakistan at 133 against 120 and for government debt percentage of GDP; again Pakistan beats India by 4 points at 106 against India’s 110.

Talking about the fourth pillar of health and primary education, Pakistan is at 129 against 98 of India. The most striking difference between the two countries in this pillar lies in the sub-pillar of HIV prevalence, share percentage of adult population, in which India ranks at 59 and Pakistan at number 1. But here one thing must be kept in mind that there is a huge population difference between the two countries.

For the fifth pillar of higher education and training, India stands at 93 and Pakistan at 127. India is ahead of Pakistan by a significant margin in all the sub-pillars of higher education and training.

“Reality doesn’t bite, rather our perception of reality bites”
In Goods Market Efficiency, India and Pakistan are at 95 and 100 respectively. For the sub-pillar of prevalence of trade barriers, Pakistan enjoys a much better ranking of 65 against India’s 100.

In Labour Market Efficiency, Pakistan and India are at 132 and 112. In the sub-pillars of country capacity to retain talent and the country capacity to attract talent, India is doing a lot better with a ranking of 42 and 46 against Pakistan’s 87 and 110 respectively.

For the pillar of financial market development, Pakistan and India stand at 72 and 51. For the ninth pillar of technological readiness, Pakistan ranks at 114 against India’s 121. Pakistan’s ranking is much better than India and almost all the sub-pillars of this main pillar.

For Market Size, India is one of the best in the world with an overall ranking of 3 against Pakistan’s 30. India sweeps Pakistan out of all the sub-pillars of market size.

For the last two pillars of business sophistication and innovation, India stands ahead of Pakistan and ranks at 57 and 49 against Pakistan’s 81 and 88.

With the statistics out there, there is is nothing more to say. I leave it to the readers to ponder over the facts cited in this nonpartisan survey and reach at a rational conclusion about the state of affairs of these two biggest south Asian economies.

http://www.thefridaytimes.com/tft/are-we-better-than-india/
 
For the sub-pillar of quality of roads infrastructure, Pakistan is at 75 and India is at 76

even here Pakistan is show better by 1 point. but i dont agree with this shitty rating, Pakistan is by far the best in our region as far as road infrastructure is concern and no ratings needed for that, just google the images of Pakistani and indian roads and you will see big difference.@Pluralist @Khan_21 @Major Sam

you are giving me pakistani source? Don't you think a more neutral source would have been better?

there is no bharati source..

Roads to nowherePakistan’s misguided obsession with infrastructure
The government is building more airports, roads and railways, even though the existing ones are underused

Print edition | Asia
Jan 19th 2017| ISLAMABAD
https://www.economist.com/node/21715032/comments
NEARLY 20 years after it opened, Pakistan’s first motorway still has a desolate feel. There is scant traffic along the 375km link between Islamabad and Lahore (pictured). Motorists can drive for miles without seeing another vehicle, save perhaps for traffic cops manning speed traps. As the two cities are already connected by the Grand Trunk Road, which is 90km shorter and toll-free, there is simply not much demand for a motorway.

Yet this $1.2bn white elephant is one of the proudest achievements of Nawaz Sharif, who was prime minister when it opened in 1997 and is once again running Pakistan. Mr Sharif, who enjoys comparisons to Sher Shah Suri, a 16th-century ruler who renovated the Grand Trunk Road, never tires of talking about it. He regained power in 2013 with a campaign which both harked back to his famous road and promised more infrastructure to come. He even pledged bullet trains that would enable pious passengers to leave Karachi after dawn prayers and arrive in Peshawar, more than 1,000km to the north, in time for evening worship.

Latest updates
See all updates
It is an article of faith for Mr Sharif and his party, the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N), that investment in infrastructure is a foolproof way of boosting the economy. His government is racing to finish umpteen projects before the next election, due by mid-2018, including a metro line in Lahore and a new airport for Islamabad. The likelihood is that the new airport (which has been plagued with problems, including runways that have been built too close together) will be as underused as most of the country’s other airports, many of which are modern and spacious.

Pakistan’s infrastructure is underused because the economic boom it was meant to trigger has never arrived. Over the past three years the government has successfully staved off a balance-of-payments crisis, achieving some measure of macroeconomic stability. It has trimmed the budget deficit, partly by broadening the tax take and partly by cutting energy subsidies. That, along with lower oil prices, has narrowed Pakistan’s trade deficit and allowed it to begin rebuilding its foreign-exchange reserves. The stockmarket has risen by 50% since the end of 2015.

But terrorism and insurgency have put off investors, both foreign and domestic. The country is also held back by inefficient and often cartelised industries, which have fallen behind rivals in India and Bangladesh. Exports, 60% of which are textiles, have been shrinking for years. Much more needs to be done to create an educated workforce. Almost half of all those aged five to 16 are out of school—25m children. Health, like education, is woefully underfunded, in part because successive governments shy away from taxing the wealthy. Only 0.6% of the population pays income tax. As the World Bank puts it, Pakistan’s long-term development depends on “better nutrition, health and education”.

Cement to be

But Mr Sharif’s government is pinning its hopes on yet more infrastructure to fix the country’s economic problems, in the form of a $46bn investment scheme known as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Much of it is being financed on commercial terms, including several power plants. Pakistan undoubtedly needs to relieve a chronic shortage of electricity. But critics fear the country will struggle to pay back the debt, especially if foreign-exchange earnings from exports continue to dwindle. At the very least, the government will need to continue chasing deadbeat customers to pay their bills and cutting expensive subsidies—steps that are deeply unpopular.

In addition to boosting Pakistan’s power supply, CPEC is supposed to link China by land to Gwadar, a deep-water port on the Arabian Sea, in the hope of creating a lucrative new trade route. New or upgraded roads will stretch the length of the country. The Karakoram Highway between the two countries, which was built in the 1960s at vast expense over a high and crumbly mountain range, is being upgraded as part of the trade corridor. But it forever needs patching up and is little used. Sceptics say Xinjiang, China’s westernmost region, is still too poor for better transport links to make much difference to Pakistan’s economy. Securing isolated stretches of road from separatist rebels in Balochistan is also gobbling up large amounts of cash.

Lijian Zhao, a Chinese diplomat, says China is all too aware that Pakistan needs more than just big-ticket infrastructure if it is to flourish. Disarmingly, he praises the efforts of Britain and other countries to improve Pakistan’s “software”, such as education and the rule of law. “But China’s expertise is hardware,” says Mr Zhao.

It may not concern Mr Sharif unduly if the next generation of roads is as deserted as the last. Civilian governments have often struggled to get much done in between military coups, but voters are impressed by gleaming new projects, even if they never use them. It’s an approach that has worked for Mr Sharif’s brother, Shehbaz, the popular chief minister of Punjab province. He has lavished resources on endless sequences of over- and underpasses to create “signal-free” traffic corridors in Lahore, the provincial capital, that are of most benefit to the rich minority who can afford cars.

There are limits, however. Khawaja Saad Rafique, the railways minister, recently admitted to parliament that the country would not be getting a bullet train after all. “When we asked the Chinese about it, they laughed at us,” he said.

This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline "Roads to nowhere"
 
even here Pakistan is show better by 1 point. but i dont agree with this shitty rating, Pakistan is by far the best in our region as far as road infrastructure is concern and no ratings needed for that, just google the images of Pakistani and indian roads and you will see big difference.@Pluralist @Khan_21 @Major Sam



there is no bharati source..

Roads to nowherePakistan’s misguided obsession with infrastructure
The government is building more airports, roads and railways, even though the existing ones are underused

Print edition | Asia
Jan 19th 2017| ISLAMABAD
NEARLY 20 years after it opened, Pakistan’s first motorway still has a desolate feel. There is scant traffic along the 375km link between Islamabad and Lahore (pictured). Motorists can drive for miles without seeing another vehicle, save perhaps for traffic cops manning speed traps. As the two cities are already connected by the Grand Trunk Road, which is 90km shorter and toll-free, there is simply not much demand for a motorway.

Yet this $1.2bn white elephant is one of the proudest achievements of Nawaz Sharif, who was prime minister when it opened in 1997 and is once again running Pakistan. Mr Sharif, who enjoys comparisons to Sher Shah Suri, a 16th-century ruler who renovated the Grand Trunk Road, never tires of talking about it. He regained power in 2013 with a campaign which both harked back to his famous road and promised more infrastructure to come. He even pledged bullet trains that would enable pious passengers to leave Karachi after dawn prayers and arrive in Peshawar, more than 1,000km to the north, in time for evening worship.

Latest updates
See all updates
It is an article of faith for Mr Sharif and his party, the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N), that investment in infrastructure is a foolproof way of boosting the economy. His government is racing to finish umpteen projects before the next election, due by mid-2018, including a metro line in Lahore and a new airport for Islamabad. The likelihood is that the new airport (which has been plagued with problems, including runways that have been built too close together) will be as underused as most of the country’s other airports, many of which are modern and spacious.

Pakistan’s infrastructure is underused because the economic boom it was meant to trigger has never arrived. Over the past three years the government has successfully staved off a balance-of-payments crisis, achieving some measure of macroeconomic stability. It has trimmed the budget deficit, partly by broadening the tax take and partly by cutting energy subsidies. That, along with lower oil prices, has narrowed Pakistan’s trade deficit and allowed it to begin rebuilding its foreign-exchange reserves. The stockmarket has risen by 50% since the end of 2015.

But terrorism and insurgency have put off investors, both foreign and domestic. The country is also held back by inefficient and often cartelised industries, which have fallen behind rivals in India and Bangladesh. Exports, 60% of which are textiles, have been shrinking for years. Much more needs to be done to create an educated workforce. Almost half of all those aged five to 16 are out of school—25m children. Health, like education, is woefully underfunded, in part because successive governments shy away from taxing the wealthy. Only 0.6% of the population pays income tax. As the World Bank puts it, Pakistan’s long-term development depends on “better nutrition, health and education”.

Cement to be

But Mr Sharif’s government is pinning its hopes on yet more infrastructure to fix the country’s economic problems, in the form of a $46bn investment scheme known as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Much of it is being financed on commercial terms, including several power plants. Pakistan undoubtedly needs to relieve a chronic shortage of electricity. But critics fear the country will struggle to pay back the debt, especially if foreign-exchange earnings from exports continue to dwindle. At the very least, the government will need to continue chasing deadbeat customers to pay their bills and cutting expensive subsidies—steps that are deeply unpopular.

In addition to boosting Pakistan’s power supply, CPEC is supposed to link China by land to Gwadar, a deep-water port on the Arabian Sea, in the hope of creating a lucrative new trade route. New or upgraded roads will stretch the length of the country. The Karakoram Highway between the two countries, which was built in the 1960s at vast expense over a high and crumbly mountain range, is being upgraded as part of the trade corridor. But it forever needs patching up and is little used. Sceptics say Xinjiang, China’s westernmost region, is still too poor for better transport links to make much difference to Pakistan’s economy. Securing isolated stretches of road from separatist rebels in Balochistan is also gobbling up large amounts of cash.

Lijian Zhao, a Chinese diplomat, says China is all too aware that Pakistan needs more than just big-ticket infrastructure if it is to flourish. Disarmingly, he praises the efforts of Britain and other countries to improve Pakistan’s “software”, such as education and the rule of law. “But China’s expertise is hardware,” says Mr Zhao.

It may not concern Mr Sharif unduly if the next generation of roads is as deserted as the last. Civilian governments have often struggled to get much done in between military coups, but voters are impressed by gleaming new projects, even if they never use them. It’s an approach that has worked for Mr Sharif’s brother, Shehbaz, the popular chief minister of Punjab province. He has lavished resources on endless sequences of over- and underpasses to create “signal-free” traffic corridors in Lahore, the provincial capital, that are of most benefit to the rich minority who can afford cars.

There are limits, however. Khawaja Saad Rafique, the railways minister, recently admitted to parliament that the country would not be getting a bullet train after all. “When we asked the Chinese about it, they laughed at us,” he said.

This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline "Roads to nowhere"


Just google it! Is this your argument?
 
Just google it! Is this your argument?

didnt your own source prove what i said? i dont agree with 1 point difference though, its much more, there is nothing like motorways in gangaland..
 
@Max

Home Global Competitiveness Index Regional highlights: South Asia
Regional highlights: South Asia



South Asia continues its upward trend and competitiveness improves in most economies in the region, which is experiencing positive economic momentum, and in 2016 is set to grow more quickly than China for the first time in more than 20 years. Over the past decade, the subcontinent has focused on improving overall health and primary education levels and upgrading infrastructure, areas of particular importance for future diversification and preparedness given the resource-driven nature of the regional economies.

In the health and primary education and the infrastructure pillars, South Asia’s average score has increased by 0.5 and 0.3 respectively since 2007, but infrastructure remains the region’s second weakest pillar, just after technological readiness. Investment in these areas will be vital to fully unlock economic growth. As they move up the development ladder, it will also be increasingly important for South Asian economies to establish competitiveness agendas to improve the functioning of their labor and financial markets, which have deteriorated over the last 10 years (Figure 12).


f12.9997554726d9bff77640844aae96d3c5.png


The region remains diverse, with a core of three heavyweight economies—India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh—surrounded by smaller ones such as Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, each with its own peculiarities and unique development path (Figure 13). Since 2007, the gap between the best- and worst-performing economies in the region has increased in some of the drivers of competitiveness, mostly as a result of the deteriorating situation in Pakistan. The quality of infrastructure has improved significantly (although from low levels) in India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, while it stalls in Nepal and deteriorates in Pakistan. Pakistan is also the only economy that fails to improve its macroeconomic environment and health and primary education levels, falling behind other South Asian economies. Financial market development remains poor across the entire region, as does technological readiness; this last area improves significantly only in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, which overtook India to become the best performer in this pillar in the region.


f13.0af42a2387ab82daa73f13237f01721a.png


India leads the group of South Asian economies, climbing to 39th with improvements across the board, including institutions and infrastructure (42nd and 68th), which have been particularly important in increasing overall competitiveness (see Box 6).

The most advanced economy in the region, Sri Lanka, slips three positions to 71st, but with a stable score. After years of conflict, the country needs to concentrate on triggering the efficiencies that will drive further growth—for example, by restructuring the labor market and investing in technological readiness, where it lags significantly behind economies at a similar stage of development. The two Himalayan economies, Bhutan (97th) and Nepal (98th), both improve their positions this year, by eight places and one place, respectively. Infrastructure and connectivity are bottlenecks for both economies but, thanks to heavy investments in hydroelectric power, Bhutan can rely on a high-quality electricity supply (41st). Nepal boasts the best macroeconomic environment in the region and, after significant recent improvement, the second highest level of health and primary education.

http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-index/regional-highlights-south-asia/
 
Pakistan made it among 35 countries requiring external assistance for Food. From South Asia, Only Pakistan and Afghanistan are included in the list.

http://www.fao.org/giews/country-analysis/external-assistance/en/

The reasons given are internal displacement due to conflicts and drought in Thar.

Those who are displaced are being sent back with operations against terrorists coming to an end. Thar got a good rain fall this year and hence situation would improve there too.
 
@Max

Home Global Competitiveness Index Regional highlights: South Asia
Regional highlights: South Asia



South Asia continues its upward trend and competitiveness improves in most economies in the region, which is experiencing positive economic momentum, and in 2016 is set to grow more quickly than China for the first time in more than 20 years. Over the past decade, the subcontinent has focused on improving overall health and primary education levels and upgrading infrastructure, areas of particular importance for future diversification and preparedness given the resource-driven nature of the regional economies.

In the health and primary education and the infrastructure pillars, South Asia’s average score has increased by 0.5 and 0.3 respectively since 2007, but infrastructure remains the region’s second weakest pillar, just after technological readiness. Investment in these areas will be vital to fully unlock economic growth. As they move up the development ladder, it will also be increasingly important for South Asian economies to establish competitiveness agendas to improve the functioning of their labor and financial markets, which have deteriorated over the last 10 years (Figure 12).


f12.9997554726d9bff77640844aae96d3c5.png


The region remains diverse, with a core of three heavyweight economies—India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh—surrounded by smaller ones such as Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, each with its own peculiarities and unique development path (Figure 13). Since 2007, the gap between the best- and worst-performing economies in the region has increased in some of the drivers of competitiveness, mostly as a result of the deteriorating situation in Pakistan. The quality of infrastructure has improved significantly (although from low levels) in India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, while it stalls in Nepal and deteriorates in Pakistan. Pakistan is also the only economy that fails to improve its macroeconomic environment and health and primary education levels, falling behind other South Asian economies. Financial market development remains poor across the entire region, as does technological readiness; this last area improves significantly only in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, which overtook India to become the best performer in this pillar in the region.


f13.0af42a2387ab82daa73f13237f01721a.png


India leads the group of South Asian economies, climbing to 39th with improvements across the board, including institutions and infrastructure (42nd and 68th), which have been particularly important in increasing overall competitiveness (see Box 6).

The most advanced economy in the region, Sri Lanka, slips three positions to 71st, but with a stable score. After years of conflict, the country needs to concentrate on triggering the efficiencies that will drive further growth—for example, by restructuring the labor market and investing in technological readiness, where it lags significantly behind economies at a similar stage of development. The two Himalayan economies, Bhutan (97th) and Nepal (98th), both improve their positions this year, by eight places and one place, respectively. Infrastructure and connectivity are bottlenecks for both economies but, thanks to heavy investments in hydroelectric power, Bhutan can rely on a high-quality electricity supply (41st). Nepal boasts the best macroeconomic environment in the region and, after significant recent improvement, the second highest level of health and primary education.

http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-index/regional-highlights-south-asia/

you can shove these reports where sun dont shine, you yourself have proven that we have better road infrastructure, i never claimed we have better infrastructure over all,
 
our people are more beautiful than Indians,

At least on this there can be no dispute. Just compare Maryam Nawaz and HRK with Mamata di and Maya behenji.

Regards
 
But you never showed any thing to back up your tall claims either and your foul language only cements your frustration

Why should i present any thing when you have come to my rescue already, didn't your report showed your country behind Pakistan in road infrastructure.. :lol: now you trying to solace yourself by posting our all infra stats which i never claimed is better then you.. apply this.

vi3yhhurqrepr20dpvap.jpg


There is no doubt that bharati have better health, education, technical infrastructure then Pakistan. Pakistan wasted all the money on roads.
 
wow
a fight on which one of the two brownies are poorer.

who cares. the question is what are you doing against it?

apna apna ghar saaf karo. yahan randi rona lagana band karo
 
Why should i present any thing when you have come to my rescue already, didn't your report showed your country behind Pakistan in road infrastructure.. now you trying to solace yourself by posting our all infra stats which i never claimed is better then you.. apply this.

vi3yhhurqrepr20dpvap.jpg

You have come with right solution because this is the thing you need the most.
 
Back
Top Bottom