What's new

India government criticises BBC's Modi documentary

undercover JIX

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

India government criticises BBC's Modi documentary​

    • Published
      17 hours ago
Share
India's prime minister Narendra Modi addresses a gathering during a Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) rally ahead of Gujarat state elections at Dehgam, some 40 kms from Ahmedabad on November 24, 2022.
IMAGE SOURCE,AFP
Image caption,
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has always denied any role in the riots
The Indian government has criticised a BBC documentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his role in the 2002 Gujarat riots.
Foreign ministry spokesman Arindam Bagchi said India: The Modi Question lacked objectivity and was propaganda.
The first of the two-part series was aired in the UK on Tuesday. The second part will go out next Tuesday.
The BBC said it was "committed to highlighting important issues from around the world".

It added that the Indian government was offered a right to reply, but they declined.
The first episode tracks Mr Modi's first steps into politics, including his rise through the ranks of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to his appointment as chief minister of the western state of Gujarat.


The documentary highlights a previously unpublished report, obtained by the BBC from the British Foreign Office, which raises questions about Mr Modi's actions during the religious riots that had broken out after a train carrying Hindu pilgrims the day before was set on fire, killing dozens. More than 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, died in the outbreak of violence, one of the worst since Independence.
The report claims that Mr Modi was "directly responsible" for the "climate of impunity" that enabled the violence.
Mr Modi has long rejected accusations that he had any responsibility for the violence and not apologised for the riots. In 2013, a Supreme Court panel also said there was insufficient evidence to prosecute him.
For three days in 2002, Hindu mobs had a free run in Gujarat
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
For three days in 2002, Hindu mobs went on a rampage in Gujarat
Mr Bagchi questioned the BBC's motive in doing the documentary now. "It makes us wonder about the purpose of this exercise and the agenda behind it," he said.
"This is a propaganda piece designed to push a particular discredited narrative. The bias, the lack of objectivity, and a continuing colonial mindset, is blatantly visible," he added.
In a statement, the broadcaster said: "The documentary series examines the tensions between India's Hindu majority and Muslim minority and explores the politics of Mr Modi in relation to those tensions."


It was "rigorously researched" and "a wide range of voices, witnesses and experts were approached, and we have featured a range of opinions, including responses from people in the BJP", it added.
The report was part of an inquiry ordered by the then foreign secretary Jack Straw. It says that "the extent of violence was much greater than reported" and "the aim of the riots was to purge Muslims from Hindu areas".
"These were very serious claims that Mr Modi had played a proactive part in pulling back police and in tacitly encouraging the Hindu extremists. That was a particularly egregious example of political involvement to prevent police from doing their job to protect the Hindus and the Muslims," Mr Straw is heard saying in the documentary.
The riots began after a fire on a passenger train in Godhra town killed 60 Hindu pilgrims
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
The riots began after a fire on a passenger train in Godhra town killed 60 Hindu pilgrims
Speaking on what action the British government could take at the time, he said, "The options... were limited, we were never going to break diplomatic relations with India, but it is obviously a stain on his [Mr Modi's] reputation."
On Thursday, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was asked in parliament by MP Imran Hussain if he agreed with the report that Mr Modi was directly responsible for the violence and "what more did the foreign office know of his involvement in this grave act of ethnic cleansing"?
Mr Sunak said "we don't tolerate persecution anywhere", but added that "he did not agree with the characterisation" of Mr Modi.


Only country where a well known and intentionally declared mass murderer is elected as PM.
 
This BBC propaganda is not even released in India.

This was made to target the Hindu community and the Hindu PM of UK.

Its quite simply a dog whistle for UK Hinduphobes.
 
Incoming street feces on why BBC is evil and what not.
 
This BBC propaganda is not even released in India.

This was made to target the Hindu community and the Hindu PM of UK.

Its quite simply a dog whistle for UK Hinduphobes.
Under the rule of RSS appointed Modi the Mass murderer, could not be released in India.
 
This BBC propaganda is not even released in India.
That makes sense, why would a fascist police state allow a documentary which is critical of the supreme leader as to not get their idiot sheep public to think for once and question the government along with its narratives?
This was made to target the Hindu community and the Hindu PM of UK.

Its quite simply a dog whistle for UK Hinduphobes.
You lot are not as important as you make yourselves out to be or wish, the BBC has dirt on every country and government in the world and spares no one. They have made documentaries brutally exposing China, Pakistan, the Church of England, etc. What makes YOU so important compared to the thousands of other documentaries the BBC have made exposing dark secrets of other nations or prominent institutions?
 
Under the rule of RSS appointed Modi the Mass murderer, could not be released in India.
That makes sense, why would a fascist police state allow a documentary which is critical of the supreme leader as to not get their idiot sheep public to think for once and question the government along with its narratives?

You lot are not as important as you make yourselves out to be or wish, the BBC has dirt on every country and government in the world and spares no one. They have made documentaries brutally exposing China, Pakistan, the Church of England, etc. What makes YOU so important compared to the thousands of other documentaries the BBC have made exposing dark secrets of other nations or prominent institutions?

LOL. What ?

BBC has quite literally released it ONLY FOR UK AUDIENCE :lol:


......the 60 Minutes web show is now available to watch Online on BBC Iplayer official website, But the show is only available for UK Audiences...


Clearly it was targeted at UK citizens, not Indians or rest of the world. :lol:



Why are you guys is such DENIAL ? Why can't you just handle the truth and move on ? amazing.
 
LOL. What ?

BBC has quite literally released it ONLY FOR UK AUDIENCE :lol:


......the 60 Minutes web show is now available to watch Online on BBC Iplayer official website, But the show is only available for UK Audiences...


Clearly it was targeted at UK citizens, not Indians or rest of the world. :lol:



Why are you guys is such DENIAL ? Why can't you just handle the truth and move on ? amazing.
alright, so Hindu Rashtra is safe, no one will know what is happening in rest of the world.

Chill karo ...
 
The fact that the MEA responded means that the documentary hit the powers where it hurts

MEA responded because it Maligns Hindus, India and the Indian PM. It also targets UK Hindus for Hate crimes and attempts to polarize UK public opinion against Hindus using cheap propaganda.

Responding to it was the right thing to do.
 
MEA responded because it Maligns Hindus, India and the Indian PM. It also targets UK Hindus for Hate crimes and attempts to polarize UK public opinion against Hindus using cheap propaganda.

Responding to it was the right thing to do.

K. Subrahmanyam, father of MEA S. Jaishankar, in 2002:
"How can people who stabbed, burnt and killed their neighbours call themselves Hindus? ...These anti-Hindus call themselves Hindus but in spirit and thought they belong to the dogmas of the dark ages":

 
K. Subrahmanyam, father of MEA S. Jaishankar, in 2002:
"How can people who stabbed, burnt and killed their neighbours call themselves Hindus? ...These anti-Hindus call themselves Hindus but in spirit and thought they belong to the dogmas of the dark ages":


Fine. We will call ourselves Muslims from now on. :lol:
 

Back
Top Bottom