What's new

India, Afghanistan, Bangladesh may boycott SAARC to protest against Pakistan sponsored terror

The current Indian govt tried its best to have normal relations with Pakistan but you guys ruined it.
with all due respect
India is the one who boycotted secratery level meeting after Pathankot base attack but later admitted that pakistan was not involved
the ball is actually in Indian court

moreover its India who is steering the course of dialogue through their hard stance and Baloch rant
Pakistan's policy is still same as it was the time NS took office
 
Bangladesh is in South Asia, so is Pakistan.

Japan is in Asia so does we, but it does not make us their neighbor,

The current Indian govt tried its best to have normal relations with Pakistan but you guys ruined it.

Yeah by blocking Foreign sec meet just bcoz we met hurriyat leaders..

We have nothing against China there is only a border issue which will be solved gradually.

We have nothing against BD yet they keep barking on Pakistan just like your media keep barking against China..

Nepal??:lol: Do you know that there is open border between India and Nepal. I can literally cross the border at 6 in the evening, visit a temple or two in Nepal and come back home by 10 pm.

Same is applied to Afghanistan, but we dont consider them friend.. nor nepalis consider you friends..

Yeah we are totally isolated.:cheers:

Yeah same as Pakistan:omghaha:
 
Last edited:
More pressure will be exerted through Afghan refugees but then refugees must be returning asap
refugee situation is not as easy as it is being precieved by both countries
returning all of them ASAP will clearly send Afghanistan back into well before 90s not only financialy but also the havoc it will cause
for Pakistan it is not feasible either because pakistan will left with no visible strategic depth
the best chance is to create a strong border
it will solve many problems for Pakistan
 
:omghaha: Isn't that the same Indian website that claimed "Russia had called off joint-military exercises" ...?

Afghanistan isnt really a relevant country; so it's participation won't really matter.


Afghanistan is may be 10-20km area near some cities that are normal but rest of country is all war zone

  • No standard for admittance into SAARC , you have a HUMAN RIGHT violator iNDIA its member just shows its potential
  • A country like afghan area "WAR ZONE"

Now Bangladesh , obviously far far east asia (Near Indonesia / Malasia / Thiland) have no geographical connection to Pakistan way far to corner of world

What exactly has SAARC achived that we can't do on a Government to Government basis ?

It is better Human Right abuser India does not shows up to meeting becasue it be awkward to offer any thing to the abuser
 
Last edited:
Neither Pakistan nor India would be isolated as such in the grouping, The two most populous nations and the two biggest economies in the region, there will be diplomatic differences from time to time like India/Nepal, India/SL or Pak/Ban, Pak/Afg but neither could afford to isolate the other nor would the rest of the regional partner countries

Authorities in both nations are far more prudent than online experts or so called nationalist commentators to realize that disengagement with one another would prove far more damaging that engagement to both countries

the relevance of SAAC is another matter altogether
 
with all due respect
India is the one who boycotted secratery level meeting after Pathankot base attack but later admitted that pakistan was not involved
the ball is actually in Indian court

moreover its India who is steering the course of dialogue through their hard stance and Baloch rant
Pakistan's policy is still same as it was the time NS took office
When did we ever said that Pakistan was not involved in the Pathakot?
Indian stance on Baluchistan is because of your involvement in Kashmir
Japan is in Asia so does we, but it does not make us their neighbor,
Japan is not in South Asia but you are.
Yeah by blocking Foreign sec meet just bcoz we met hurriyat leaders..
And what did you guys expected? You either talk to the govt of India or you can talk to the Hurriyats and other nitbits. There is no third party to the Kashmir conflict.
We have nothing against BD yet they keep barking on Pakistan..
Same is applied to Afghanistan, but we dont consider them friend..
Only an Afghan or a Bangladeshi can comment on that.
Yeah same as Bharatis:omghaha:
o_O
 
Offcourse Pakistani govt was not involved. PM Nawaz and his cabinet didn't trained and armed those militants.
But they were trained by Jaish-e-mohammed a terror organisation lead by Masood Azhar both are in Pakistan.
Why you are hellbent on making bengalis our neighbors while we are not..
They are not your immediate neighbors. But Bangladesh is in your neighborhood.
Its ok if you don't want them to be your neighbors, it doesn't matter much to them and neither to you.

We are not here to listen bharti dictates.. we are not BD or Afghanistan..
Okay.
:tup:
 

Back
Top Bottom