You are not getting it right to begin with. The military is not "in its rights to declare someone a threat" in violation of law. The military has absolutely no role in controlling media. Its duties are on the border dealing with threats there.
Ah, and i think you did not get my point, i believe that you need to read my above post again --- if Geo as an entity,party or as an organization has veen deckared as a threat to the institution in question or to the interests of this country , and this threat assessment is for internal purposes only - i.e to formulate or review the internal policies than it is not in voilation of law --- they are not discriminating abyone on the basis of their race ,religion or ethnicity, its purely based on their actions ....
And inhave asked you above - if any of the members , employee, or Geo itself has been publicly, in the official capicity declared a threat by any of the institution, be it PEMrA or Military, please do let me know about that.....
But if military is stopping its employees from watching a particular channel within the premises of organization, then they have right, its same as barring the use of facebook and other social sites....
Geo has been deckared a threat, internally, not externally --- peroid....
Next time please refer to the law, military is in voilation of by declaring geo as a threat --- i know how policymaking is done, i work in a multi national organization too at a middle management ----and reviewing policies and procedures is what i do
You are not getting it right to begin with. The military is not "in its rights to declare someone a threat" in violation of law. The military has absolutely no role in controlling media. Its duties are on the border dealing with threats there.
Yes military is reaching out to every damn cable operator in the country - thats how useless they are --- lol, ypur logic fails