What's new

Does Turkey Benefit From Cold War With Israel?

Theories are that humanity has spread to world from Caucasus and Middleast.

But those theories dont explain why there are humans with Asiatic and Negro features.

Theories about Negro or Asiatic features are quite clear; the reason, for instance, why Chinese have narrow eyes, is because of the cold weather they encountered when they migrated to those places. It was a natural reaction against the cold wind.
 
Iajj I suggest you watch Bruce Lee films, it will rise your inferiority even more.

No wonder superior people like Japanese and Turks are close allies.

Both ruler races, Janisarries, Samurai.

Ottoman Empire, Imperial Japan. And ruler of mighty empires.
 
Bulgars were Magyars before Tatar invasion. Now they are Turco-Mongol.

Source: Julianus Barat, Magyar missionary of 13th century.
 
Bulgars were Magyars before Tatar invasion. Now they are Turco-Mongol.

Majority of Bulgarian scientists aware that Bulgarians have proto-Iranian anthropological descent: expert

Sofia. “Modern genetic researches show that around 40% of the contemporary Bulgarians are heirs of the local population, 40% have origin of East Iranian type, while only 12% have Slav drop of blood,” said Associate Professor Alexandar Iliev, speaking at a press conference for the presentation of the results of the Bulgarians – Land of Origin expedition, FOCUS News Agency reporter informed. “90% of the scientists in Bulgaria are already well-aware that the Bulgarians have proto-Iranian anthropological descent,” Iliev remarked.

Majority of Bulgarian scientists aware that Bulgarians have proto-Iranian anthropological descent: expert - FOCUS Information Agency

Scholars Claim Bulgarians Descended from Iran

The place of origin of the Ancient Bulgarians is most likely Eastern Iran, a group of anthropologists and scientists have claimed after an exploratory trip to the Persian lands.

The team of six scientists led by anthropology professor Alexander Iliev presented Wednesday their findings after touring Iran for 20 days, traveling 1100 km inside the country.

“We have found impressive evidence about the Iranian origin of the ancient Bulgarians,” Iliev stated.

The findings include several prototypes of the bronze eagle of the legendary founder of Danube Bulgaria, Khan Asparuh, found in his grave in today’s Ukraine. The Bulgarian team has also researched several graves in Iran bearing similarities to the funerals of the ancient Bulgarians – as well as to those of the ancient Thracians.

The ancient stoneworks and bricks that the expedition studied in Iran are also said to be very similar to the ones employed by the Bulgarians in the late Antiquity and early Middle Ages

.“Even though the Iranians are darker-skinned, they look very much like the Bulgarians anthropologically. Some of the words in today’s Persian language sound the same as words in Bulgarian. Their traditional musical instruments such as whistles, bagpipes, and tambourine fully correspond our folklore tradition. Over half of the carpers in the Caspian areas of Iran coincide with the ornaments, symbols, and colors of the Bulgarian carpets,” Iliev said.

“We should finally forget the thesis that the Bulgarians are Huns of Turkic origin, and should understand that we are from the Indo-European family. We are less than 20% Slavic. The Slavs are not the major element of the Bulgarian ethnicity,” stated in turn historian Georgi Bakalov.

The interdisciplinary expedition to Iran was sponsored by the Foreign Ministry, the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, the Sofia University, and the Tangra TanNakRa foundation.

The Ancient Bulgarians are known to have settled into today’s Ukraine in the 6th-7th century AD, and to have advanced to the lower Danube around 680 AD, as well as to other parts of Europe.

Long-established theories about the making up of the Bulgarian ethnicity state that the Bulgarian nation was formed through the mixing of the Bulgarians with the local population made up of Slavs and some Thracians. Before 1989 the Bulgarians were believed to have been a minor tribe of tribe of Turkic origin; new research have led scholars to believe that they were in fact more numerous and originated in Central Asia, somewhere in Iran and Afghanistan.

Bulgaria: Scholars Claim Bulgarians Descended from Iran - Novinite.com - Sofia News Agency
 
Can Azeri study their own language in school as a course? I don't think so.

what's the need for that ? they can study it in university ?
by the way they learn it in their house and the grammar is exactly the same as Persian.

by the way unlike other countries all the Iranian students must study the same books and if we ask Azeri to learn Azeri in the primary school then we must ask kurds and lors and Arabs to learn Azeri in schools then the Azeri must also learn Lori and Kurdish in schools , then why not Gilaki and Baluchi ?

right knew each Iranian Student learn 2 more language (Arabic and English) other than Persian in schools and adding several other to that is totally impractical . by the way there isn't an Azeri course but in schools in Azeri areas when they are not teacing the text they are speaking with Azeri language not Persian language.

know answer what will happen in Turkey if a government employee in Turkey speak Kurdish language at his work ? Are Kurds allowed to speak Kurdish in schools ., those they have kurdish Course in schools ? and they are 23% of turkey population and also the main population of Kurds live in Turkey .

let show you how you deal with Kurds .
In 1937–1938, approximately 50,000–70,000 Alevi Kurds[9][10][11] were killed and thousands went into exile.
An estimated 3,000 Kurdish villages in Turkey were virtually wiped from the map, representing the displacement of more than 378,000 people[18] or, as put by the Human Rights Watch:

"Evacuations were unlawful and violent. Security forces would surround a village using helicopters, armored vehicles, troops, and village guards, and burn stored produce, agricultural equipment, crops, orchards, forests, and livestock. They set fire to houses, often giving the inhabitants no opportunity to retrieve their possessions. During the course of such operations, security forces frequently abused and humiliated villagers, stole their property and cash, and ill-treated or tortured them before herding them onto the roads and away from their former homes. The operations were marked by scores of “disappearances” and extrajudicial executions. By the mid-1990s, more than 3,000 villages had been virtually wiped from the map, and, according to official figures, 378,335 Kurdish villagers had been displaced and left homeless."[18]

The European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) reports that (as of April 2010): "The public use by officials of the Kurdish language lays them open to prosecution, and public defence by individuals of Kurdish or minority interests also frequently leads to prosecutions under the Criminal Code."[35] From the 1994 briefing at the International Human Rights Law Group: "the problem in Turkey is the Constitution is against the Kurds and the apartheid constitution is very similar to it."[36]
Abbas Manafy from New Mexico Highlands University claims "The Kurdish deprivation of their own culture, language, and tradition is incompatible with democratic norms. It reflects an apartheid system that victimizes minorities like Armenians, Kurds, and Shii Muslems [Shiite Muslims]."
 
That person supposed to be a scholar and look at those childish statements. Reminded me some of by country's scholars.

JEskankadari

Whats wrong with Azeri being an optional lesson in schools ? whats the difference from having English or German optional lessons ? Because of not getting proper education of it, they're not able to write in their own language properly nor able to tidy and improve their own language, they able to speak basic street language if they learn it from their families and many of those who don't have that option forgets their language.

Why they not speak Kurdish in school ? yes there are Kurdish courses and optional Kurdish lessons in schools.
 
Why they used to call God as Tangra? Turkic Tengri. Ng is a single letter which sounds thick n btw. We use Tanri now.

The name of the God in the Bulgarian religion is called Tangra, according to Veselin Beshevliev. In his view Tangra means “sky”, and he connects the word with the term Tien(sky). In central Asia there is mountain peak with the similar name: Khan Tengri, in the mountain TianShan. Peter Dobrev derives the word from the Pamirian “Tandra” which is the god of thunder in certain Pamiri tribes

Pamir languages - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Again claims.

Its the same with the Turkic theory. I don't believe that Bulgars are Turkic, or Iranic. Genetic tests shows that they pretty much cluster with other Slavic groups, but there are some minor influences.
 
Iranian heritage of Bulgars:





I know, no academic sources, but just wanted to show that some of those people think they have Iranic origins.

bulgars were not iranic ..lol
Bulgar is an extinct language which was spoken by the Bulgars. It was a language belonging to Oghur subgroup of Turkic languages
It is named for the Bulgars, a tribal association which established the Bulgar khanate, known as Old Great Bulgaria in the mid-7th century, giving rise to the Danubian Bulgaria by the 680s. While the language was extinct in Danubian Bulgaria (in favour of the Slavic Bulgarian language), it persisted in Volga Bulgaria, eventually giving rise to the modern Chuvash language.
Mainstream scholarship place the Bulgar language among the "Lir" branch of Turkic languages referred to as Oghur-Turkic, Lir-Turkic, or, indeed, "Bulgar Turkic" as opposed to the "Shaz"-type of Common Turkic. The "Lir" branch is characterized by sound correspondences such as Oghuric r versus Common Turkic (or Shaz-Turkic) z and Oghuric l versus Common Turkic (Shaz-Turkic) š.As was stated by Al-Istakhri "the language of Bulgars resembles the language of Khazars". The only surviving language from this linguistic group is the Chuvash.
On the other hand, some Bulgarian historians, especially modern ones, link the Bulgar language to the Iranian language group instead (more specifically, the Pamir languages are frequently mentioned), noting the presence of Iranic words in the modern Bulgarian language. According to Prof. Raymond Detrez, who is a specialist in Bulgarian history and language, such views have an ideological motivation.[ However, other Bulgarian historians, especially older ones, only point out certain signs of Iranian influence in the Turkic base, or indeed support the Turkic theory
The language of the Danube Bulgars (or Danube Bulgar) is recorded in a small number of inscriptions, which are found in Pliska, the first capital of Danube Bulgaria and in the rock churches near the village of Murfatlar, present-day Romania. Some of these inscriptions are written with Greek characters, others with runes similar to the Orkhon script. Most of them appear to have a private character (oaths, dedications, inscriptions on grave stones) and some were court inventories. Although attempts at decipherment have been made, none of them has gained wide acceptance. These inscriptions in Danube-Bulgar are found along with other official ones written in Greek. Greek was used as the official state language of Danube Bulgaria until the 9th century, when it was replaced by Old Bulgarian (Slavonic).
The language of the Danube Bulgars is also known from a small number of loanwords in the Old Bulgarian language, as well as terms occurring in Bulgar Greek-language inscriptions, contemporary Byzantine texts, and later Slavonic Old Bulgarian texts. Most of these words designate titles and other concepts concerning the affairs of state, including the official 12-year cyclic calendar (as used e.g. in the Nominalia of the Bulgarian Khans). The language became extinct in Danubian Bulgaria in the 9th century as the Bulgar nobility became gradually Slavicized after the Old Bulgarian was declared as official in 893
The language spoken by the population of Volga Bulgaria is known as Volga-Bulgar. There are a number of surviving inscriptions in Volga-Bulgar, some of which are written with Arabic letters, alongside the continuing use of Turkic runes. These are all largely decipherable. That language persisted until the 13th or the 14th century. In that region, it may have ultimately given rise to the Chuvash language, which is most closely related to it and which is classified as the only surviving member of a separate "Oghur-Turkic" (or Lir-Turkic) branch of the Turkic languages, to which Bulgar is also considered to have belonged (see above). Still, the precise position of Chuvash within the Oghur family of languages is a matter of dispute among linguists. Since the comparative material attributable to the extinct members of Oghuric (Hunnic, Turkic Avar, Khazar and Bulgar) is scant, little is known about any precise interrelation of these languages and it is a matter of dispute whether Chuvash, the only "Lir"-type language with sufficient extant linguistic material, might be the daughter language of any of these or just a sister branch
Volga bulgars are still turkic like chuvash
russians used fake tatar name aganist bulgars turks like azerbaijani turks
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Interesting. Or Maybe Pamiris have taken the word Tandra from Turks. You thought about it?

Uighurs adopted a variant of Soghdian alphabet, i dont deny cultural trade between communities. But on the Bulgaria of Volga, they used Orkhon script. So appearently cultural exchange was more common between Bulgars and Turks, rather than between Bulgars and Pamiris.
 
Atilla Han a great Turkish military leader. One of the most feared leaders that went to all the France.

Great Turkish archers with the their great bows destroyed many enemies, able to rapidly fire.

Turan!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom