What's new

Chinese universities ranked ahead of Oxbridge, Caltech in quality research output by Nature Index

Nan Yang

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
5,252
Reaction score
1
Country
Malaysia
Location
Malaysia

Chinese universities ranked ahead of Oxbridge, Caltech in quality research output by Nature Index

  • Rankings based on published scientific papers show Chinese institutions overtaking the US and other Western counterparts
  • Sun Yat-sen University overtakes Oxford with 22 per cent more contributions to world research in the past year, rankings show

Zhang Tong
Zhang Tong in Beijing
Published: 10:00pm, 12 Jun, 2023
Sun Yat-sen University, based in Guangzhou, southern China, was placed 10th on the Nature Index listing based on scientific research output. Photo: Getty Images

Sun Yat-sen University, based in Guangzhou, southern China, was placed 10th on the Nature Index listing based on scientific research output. Photo: Getty Images

Some universities that are little known outside China are rapidly surpassing their more established counterparts in the West – including Oxford, Cambridge, Princeton and Caltech – in high-quality scientific research, according to the latest Nature Index.

Seven of the top 10 university contributors were from China in the updated list – maintained by the academic journal Nature – that tracks contributions to research articles published in 82 of the world’s most influential natural science journals.

The index was based on scientific research output between February 1, 2022 and January 31, using “simple, transparent and current metrics that demonstrate high quality research and collaboration”, according to Nature.

The top five spots were dominated by large-scale institutions like the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Germany’s Max Plank Society and the French National Centre for Scientific Research, apart from Harvard University, which scored second place.

Excluding large-scale institutions, Harvard was closely followed by the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC). The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) – which has a close relationship with the CAS – was in third place among university contributors.


Chinese dominance continued down the rankings, with Nanjing University – one of the oldest and most prestigious universities in China – joining hands with Beijing’s renowned Peking University and Tsinghua University to take fourth, fifth and sixth places, respectively.

Stanford placed seventh while Zhejiang University, known for its engineering, computer science and technology programmes, was ranked eighth. Next was the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

In 10th place was Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, in the southern province of Guangdong.
Britain’s Oxford and Cambridge universities only made it to the 16th and 19th spots, respectively, despite being ranked second and fourth in this year’s QS World University Rankings, compiled by higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds.

Sun Yat-sen University, which ranks 267 in the QS list, overtook the University of Oxford by making 22 per cent more contributions to the world’s published high-quality research, according to the Nature Index.

Some North American universities also received low scores from the Nature Index compared with their QS rankings.

The California Institute of Technology (Caltech), which is ranked sixth best in the world by QS, placed 47th in the Nature list. University of Chicago, in 10th place on the QS ranking, was in the 51st spot in terms of research output.
1686601353585.png


The highest placed Chinese universities in the QS rankings are Peking University at No 12 and Tsinghua University in 14th place. The QS list ranks Nanjing University at No 133, with USTC placed 94th. UCAS is not included in the QS ranking.

A look at the Nature Index between 2015 and 2023 shows how rapidly China has been closing the gap with the US in terms of high-quality research output.

China’s share of quality published research – a signature metric of the index – was 37 per cent of the US output in 2015. By 2020, that had risen to 69 per cent. In this year’s list, China’s share has overtaken the United States’ contribution by 20 per cent.

Among the four major disciplines tracked by the index – chemistry, Earth and environment, life sciences, and physical sciences – Chinese universities have a clear lead in chemistry.

After overtaking US contributions in the field of chemistry in 2018, Chinese institutions this year contributed more than twice as much research as their American counterparts on the list.

In physics, USTC, Tsinghua University and UCAS took the top three places in the Nature Index rankings. Correspondingly, the US maintained a substantial lead in life sciences, with its research output more than triple that of China’s.

The growth of Chinese research is in part associated with the return to China of many well-known scientists, a shift that has included switching their academic affiliations to institutions in the country.

Additionally, an article published in August by the peer-reviewed journal Science indicated that Chinese scientists have leapt to the forefront in terms of the number of highly-cited papers published.

“The research level of Chinese universities has been significantly enhanced. Since the pace is fast, there is naturally more research output,” Xiamen University professor Peng Li said.

Liu Zunfeng, a professor from Nankai University, said China’s strong results also stemmed from its emphasis on fundamental scientific research but the scope of the index was limited.

“The index mainly consists of results from a few representative journals across various fields. It is more of a measurement indicator in the field of basic scientific research,” he said.
Liu said the Nature Index reflected just one aspect of research, tracking only a small proportion of articles published and covering just the natural sciences.

“Many scientific research institutions do not publish papers or write patents, choosing instead to keep their technology confidential. Therefore, the information reflected in this list is limited,” he said.

Rankings by QS and US News – which often place Chinese universities lower – also consider factors like a school’s wealth and accolades, as indicators of its “soft power”. These elements are not taken into account in the Nature Index.

A representative of a study-abroad agency in Beijing said the agency referred mainly to the broader QS rankings when recommending overseas institutions.

“In addition to research capabilities, students also consider factors such as faculty quality and graduation rates. Ultimately, they choose a highly ranked school that aligns with their professional abilities,” the representative said.

Studying abroad is still seen as an important part of a student’s academic training, with Liu describing international exchanges as “crucial”.

“For instance, after completing a doctoral degree, it is ideal to engage in postdoctoral research abroad, as it helps to broaden one’s horizons,” he said.

Peng also regards the opportunity to study abroad as an important part of the university experience.

“Because many universities emphasise overseas experience when recruiting, when students continue their studies, they should first consider better overseas colleges,” she said.

“But if they only receive offers from ordinary colleges, I would suggest they find a better university in China.”

1686601628474.png


Source
 

Chinese universities ranked ahead of Oxbridge, Caltech in quality research output by Nature Index

  • Rankings based on published scientific papers show Chinese institutions overtaking the US and other Western counterparts
  • Sun Yat-sen University overtakes Oxford with 22 per cent more contributions to world research in the past year, rankings show

Zhang Tong
Zhang Tong in Beijing
Published: 10:00pm, 12 Jun, 2023
Sun Yat-sen University, based in Guangzhou, southern China, was placed 10th on the Nature Index listing based on scientific research output. Photo: Getty Images

Sun Yat-sen University, based in Guangzhou, southern China, was placed 10th on the Nature Index listing based on scientific research output. Photo: Getty Images

Some universities that are little known outside China are rapidly surpassing their more established counterparts in the West – including Oxford, Cambridge, Princeton and Caltech – in high-quality scientific research, according to the latest Nature Index.

Seven of the top 10 university contributors were from China in the updated list – maintained by the academic journal Nature – that tracks contributions to research articles published in 82 of the world’s most influential natural science journals.

The index was based on scientific research output between February 1, 2022 and January 31, using “simple, transparent and current metrics that demonstrate high quality research and collaboration”, according to Nature.

The top five spots were dominated by large-scale institutions like the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Germany’s Max Plank Society and the French National Centre for Scientific Research, apart from Harvard University, which scored second place.

Excluding large-scale institutions, Harvard was closely followed by the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC). The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) – which has a close relationship with the CAS – was in third place among university contributors.


Chinese dominance continued down the rankings, with Nanjing University – one of the oldest and most prestigious universities in China – joining hands with Beijing’s renowned Peking University and Tsinghua University to take fourth, fifth and sixth places, respectively.

Stanford placed seventh while Zhejiang University, known for its engineering, computer science and technology programmes, was ranked eighth. Next was the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

In 10th place was Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, in the southern province of Guangdong.
Britain’s Oxford and Cambridge universities only made it to the 16th and 19th spots, respectively, despite being ranked second and fourth in this year’s QS World University Rankings, compiled by higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds.

Sun Yat-sen University, which ranks 267 in the QS list, overtook the University of Oxford by making 22 per cent more contributions to the world’s published high-quality research, according to the Nature Index.

Some North American universities also received low scores from the Nature Index compared with their QS rankings.

The California Institute of Technology (Caltech), which is ranked sixth best in the world by QS, placed 47th in the Nature list. University of Chicago, in 10th place on the QS ranking, was in the 51st spot in terms of research output.
View attachment 934123

The highest placed Chinese universities in the QS rankings are Peking University at No 12 and Tsinghua University in 14th place. The QS list ranks Nanjing University at No 133, with USTC placed 94th. UCAS is not included in the QS ranking.

A look at the Nature Index between 2015 and 2023 shows how rapidly China has been closing the gap with the US in terms of high-quality research output.

China’s share of quality published research – a signature metric of the index – was 37 per cent of the US output in 2015. By 2020, that had risen to 69 per cent. In this year’s list, China’s share has overtaken the United States’ contribution by 20 per cent.

Among the four major disciplines tracked by the index – chemistry, Earth and environment, life sciences, and physical sciences – Chinese universities have a clear lead in chemistry.

After overtaking US contributions in the field of chemistry in 2018, Chinese institutions this year contributed more than twice as much research as their American counterparts on the list.

In physics, USTC, Tsinghua University and UCAS took the top three places in the Nature Index rankings. Correspondingly, the US maintained a substantial lead in life sciences, with its research output more than triple that of China’s.

The growth of Chinese research is in part associated with the return to China of many well-known scientists, a shift that has included switching their academic affiliations to institutions in the country.

Additionally, an article published in August by the peer-reviewed journal Science indicated that Chinese scientists have leapt to the forefront in terms of the number of highly-cited papers published.

“The research level of Chinese universities has been significantly enhanced. Since the pace is fast, there is naturally more research output,” Xiamen University professor Peng Li said.

Liu Zunfeng, a professor from Nankai University, said China’s strong results also stemmed from its emphasis on fundamental scientific research but the scope of the index was limited.

“The index mainly consists of results from a few representative journals across various fields. It is more of a measurement indicator in the field of basic scientific research,” he said.
Liu said the Nature Index reflected just one aspect of research, tracking only a small proportion of articles published and covering just the natural sciences.

“Many scientific research institutions do not publish papers or write patents, choosing instead to keep their technology confidential. Therefore, the information reflected in this list is limited,” he said.

Rankings by QS and US News – which often place Chinese universities lower – also consider factors like a school’s wealth and accolades, as indicators of its “soft power”. These elements are not taken into account in the Nature Index.

A representative of a study-abroad agency in Beijing said the agency referred mainly to the broader QS rankings when recommending overseas institutions.

“In addition to research capabilities, students also consider factors such as faculty quality and graduation rates. Ultimately, they choose a highly ranked school that aligns with their professional abilities,” the representative said.

Studying abroad is still seen as an important part of a student’s academic training, with Liu describing international exchanges as “crucial”.

“For instance, after completing a doctoral degree, it is ideal to engage in postdoctoral research abroad, as it helps to broaden one’s horizons,” he said.

Peng also regards the opportunity to study abroad as an important part of the university experience.

“Because many universities emphasise overseas experience when recruiting, when students continue their studies, they should first consider better overseas colleges,” she said.

“But if they only receive offers from ordinary colleges, I would suggest they find a better university in China.”

View attachment 934126

Source
Lol last year 2,99,000 chinese joined American Universities . How many Americans came to study in Chinese universities ?
 
Lol last year 2,99,000 chinese joined American Universities . How many Americans came to study in Chinese universities ?
Lol, there are 23000 Indian students studying at Chinese universities and about 90000 Indians working and living in China. There are about zero Chinese students studying in India and only few working there.
 
Last edited:
Lol, there are 23000 Indian students studying at Chinese universities and about 90000 Indians working and living in China. There are about zero Chinese students studying in India.
How many Americans are studying in greatest and best chinese Universities ? India , pakistan , bangladesh are third world countries , toppers from these countries go to study in American universities , those who do not get admission in US they may opt for china and other second class universities . Some Indian students study even in Nepal and Bangladesh because they do not get admission in good Indian medical or engineering college .
 
Mash'Allah, we Pakistanis are happy for China, because many see China as an alternative to the West.
under terror of xi, china will never be an alternative to the west for pakistanis

not economically, not for immigration, not for education, not culturally, not for entertainment, not for political guidance, not for technology

when it comes for time to choose sides, pakistan will choose west
 

Chinese universities ranked ahead of Oxbridge, Caltech in quality research output by Nature Index

  • Rankings based on published scientific papers show Chinese institutions overtaking the US and other Western counterparts
  • Sun Yat-sen University overtakes Oxford with 22 per cent more contributions to world research in the past year, rankings show

Zhang Tong
Zhang Tong in Beijing
Published: 10:00pm, 12 Jun, 2023
Sun Yat-sen University, based in Guangzhou, southern China, was placed 10th on the Nature Index listing based on scientific research output. Photo: Getty Images

Sun Yat-sen University, based in Guangzhou, southern China, was placed 10th on the Nature Index listing based on scientific research output. Photo: Getty Images

Some universities that are little known outside China are rapidly surpassing their more established counterparts in the West – including Oxford, Cambridge, Princeton and Caltech – in high-quality scientific research, according to the latest Nature Index.

Seven of the top 10 university contributors were from China in the updated list – maintained by the academic journal Nature – that tracks contributions to research articles published in 82 of the world’s most influential natural science journals.

The index was based on scientific research output between February 1, 2022 and January 31, using “simple, transparent and current metrics that demonstrate high quality research and collaboration”, according to Nature.

The top five spots were dominated by large-scale institutions like the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Germany’s Max Plank Society and the French National Centre for Scientific Research, apart from Harvard University, which scored second place.

Excluding large-scale institutions, Harvard was closely followed by the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC). The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) – which has a close relationship with the CAS – was in third place among university contributors.


Chinese dominance continued down the rankings, with Nanjing University – one of the oldest and most prestigious universities in China – joining hands with Beijing’s renowned Peking University and Tsinghua University to take fourth, fifth and sixth places, respectively.

Stanford placed seventh while Zhejiang University, known for its engineering, computer science and technology programmes, was ranked eighth. Next was the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

In 10th place was Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, in the southern province of Guangdong.
Britain’s Oxford and Cambridge universities only made it to the 16th and 19th spots, respectively, despite being ranked second and fourth in this year’s QS World University Rankings, compiled by higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds.

Sun Yat-sen University, which ranks 267 in the QS list, overtook the University of Oxford by making 22 per cent more contributions to the world’s published high-quality research, according to the Nature Index.

Some North American universities also received low scores from the Nature Index compared with their QS rankings.

The California Institute of Technology (Caltech), which is ranked sixth best in the world by QS, placed 47th in the Nature list. University of Chicago, in 10th place on the QS ranking, was in the 51st spot in terms of research output.
View attachment 934123

The highest placed Chinese universities in the QS rankings are Peking University at No 12 and Tsinghua University in 14th place. The QS list ranks Nanjing University at No 133, with USTC placed 94th. UCAS is not included in the QS ranking.

A look at the Nature Index between 2015 and 2023 shows how rapidly China has been closing the gap with the US in terms of high-quality research output.

China’s share of quality published research – a signature metric of the index – was 37 per cent of the US output in 2015. By 2020, that had risen to 69 per cent. In this year’s list, China’s share has overtaken the United States’ contribution by 20 per cent.

Among the four major disciplines tracked by the index – chemistry, Earth and environment, life sciences, and physical sciences – Chinese universities have a clear lead in chemistry.

After overtaking US contributions in the field of chemistry in 2018, Chinese institutions this year contributed more than twice as much research as their American counterparts on the list.

In physics, USTC, Tsinghua University and UCAS took the top three places in the Nature Index rankings. Correspondingly, the US maintained a substantial lead in life sciences, with its research output more than triple that of China’s.

The growth of Chinese research is in part associated with the return to China of many well-known scientists, a shift that has included switching their academic affiliations to institutions in the country.

Additionally, an article published in August by the peer-reviewed journal Science indicated that Chinese scientists have leapt to the forefront in terms of the number of highly-cited papers published.

“The research level of Chinese universities has been significantly enhanced. Since the pace is fast, there is naturally more research output,” Xiamen University professor Peng Li said.

Liu Zunfeng, a professor from Nankai University, said China’s strong results also stemmed from its emphasis on fundamental scientific research but the scope of the index was limited.

“The index mainly consists of results from a few representative journals across various fields. It is more of a measurement indicator in the field of basic scientific research,” he said.
Liu said the Nature Index reflected just one aspect of research, tracking only a small proportion of articles published and covering just the natural sciences.

“Many scientific research institutions do not publish papers or write patents, choosing instead to keep their technology confidential. Therefore, the information reflected in this list is limited,” he said.

Rankings by QS and US News – which often place Chinese universities lower – also consider factors like a school’s wealth and accolades, as indicators of its “soft power”. These elements are not taken into account in the Nature Index.

A representative of a study-abroad agency in Beijing said the agency referred mainly to the broader QS rankings when recommending overseas institutions.

“In addition to research capabilities, students also consider factors such as faculty quality and graduation rates. Ultimately, they choose a highly ranked school that aligns with their professional abilities,” the representative said.

Studying abroad is still seen as an important part of a student’s academic training, with Liu describing international exchanges as “crucial”.

“For instance, after completing a doctoral degree, it is ideal to engage in postdoctoral research abroad, as it helps to broaden one’s horizons,” he said.

Peng also regards the opportunity to study abroad as an important part of the university experience.

“Because many universities emphasise overseas experience when recruiting, when students continue their studies, they should first consider better overseas colleges,” she said.

“But if they only receive offers from ordinary colleges, I would suggest they find a better university in China.”

View attachment 934126

Source

MIT Havard is taking too much of LGBT. feminazi, BLM. rich kids 富二代.

They are going to sht hole.
 
Look like things are happening. And I think the trend will continue going forward.
 
Lol last year 2,99,000 chinese joined American Universities . How many Americans came to study in Chinese universities ?
Even if americans want they can't enter in these universities,they have to go through gaokao ,so what's your braincells killing point ?
 
Even if americans want they can't enter in these universities,they have to go through gaokao ,so what's your braincells killing point ?
This is why whole world goes to qualify the test of GRE and TOEFL to get admission in US universities , nobody bothers about gaokao or kaokao which is some test to get admission in world's best universities . Only chinese may know the name kaokao others don't bother.
 
Last edited:
The US college admission system is legalized nepotism. Most important thing is not grade but rather, a recommendation letter from some big shot. The next priority goes to Jews, BLM, feminazi, LGBT.

East Asian rank last in admission priority.

In China recommendation letter will not get you anywhere. You patrons will go to jail. (There are exceptions. Very top princelings still get slots in PKU and Tsinghua)
 
This is why whole world goes to qualify the test of GRE and TOEFL to get admission in US universities , nobody bothers about gaokao or kaokao which is some test to get admission in world's best universities . Only chinese may know the name kaokao others don't bother.
What's a whole world ? for pisspoor indian with limited foreign language education , it may be so .
Muh muricaaa!!!! la indian larping when talking up superior china.
 
What's a whole world ? for pisspoor indian with limited foreign language education , it may be so .
Muh muricaaa!!!! la indian larping when talking up superior china.
Go appear for the GRE and TOEFL , if qualify get visa of US and get admission in some good US university , let those poor chinese who do not get visa to US appear for kaokao and get some degree from best university of china which only chinese know .
 
Go appear for the GRE and TOEFL , if qualify get visa of US and get admission in some good US university , let those poor chinese who do not get visa to US appear for kaokao and get some degree from best university of china which only chinese know .
Lol, top Chinese students don't go to US universities to get degrees unlike Indians. they attend Chinese universities. Don't make foolish talk.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom